Smoking cessation in adults: A dual process perspective

References

• Anderson CB, Pollak KI, Wetter DW. Relations between self-generated positive and negative expected smoking outcomes and smoking behavior: An exploratory study among adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2002; 16: 196–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon TH, Baker TB. The smoking consequences questionnaire: The subjective expected utility of smoking in college students. Journal of Consulting and Psychology 1991; 3: 484–493
   Google Scholar
• Brandon TH, Juliano LM, Copeland AL. Expectancies for tobacco smoking. How expectancies shape behavior, I Kirsch. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C. 1999; 263–299
   Google Scholar
• Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1966; 1: 245–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. Lawrence, Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 2003
   Google Scholar
• Copeland AL, Brandon TH, Quinn EP. The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire—Adult: Measurement of smoking outcome expectancies of experienced smokers. Psychological Assessment 1995; 7: 484–494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Clemente CC, Prochaska JO, Fairhurst SK, Velicer WF, Velasquez MM, Rossi JS. The process of smoking cessation: An analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1991; 59: 295–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein S. Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist 1994; 53: 709–724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finucane ML, Alhakami A, Slovic P, Johnson SM. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2000; 131: 1–17
   Google Scholar
• Finucane ML, Peters E, Slovic P. Judgment and decision making: The dance of affect and reason. Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research. Cambridge series on judgment and decision making, SL Schneider, J Shanteau. Cambridge University Press, New York 2003; 327–364
   Google Scholar
• Hammond D, Fong GT, McDonald PW, Brown S, Cameron R. Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes: evidence from Canadian smokers. American Journal of Public Health 2004; 94: 1442–1445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine DW, Honan C, Marks ADG, Brettschneider K. Development and validation of the Smoking Expectancy Scale for Adolescents. Psychological Assessment 2007; 19: 347–355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine DW, Marks ADG, Nachriener M, Gifford R, Heath Y. Keeping the home fires burning: The affect heuristic and wood smoke pollution. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2007; 27: 26–32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine DW, McKenzie-Richer A, Lewko JH, Tilleczek K, Perreault L. A comparison of the mediational properties of four adolescent smoking expectancy measures. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2002; 16: 187–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine DW, Tilleczek K, Lewko J, McKenzie-Richer A, Perreault L. Measuring adolescent smoking expectancies by incorporating judgments about the expected time of occurrence of smoking outcomes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2005; 19: 284–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1965; 30: 179–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaccard J. Interaction effects in logistic regression. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2001
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Esquerre JM, Rodrigue JR, Kahler CW. Development and validation of an adolescent smoking consequences questionnaire. Nicotine and Tobacco Research 2005; 7: 81–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks ADG, O’Neill G, Hine DW. The role of affect, expectancies and dual processes of cognition in predicting adult cigarette smoking. The Australian Journal of Psychology 2007; 10, Published online. DOI: 1080/00049530701656273
   Google Scholar
• Myers MG, McCarthy DM, MacPherson L, Brown SA. Constructing a short form of the smoking consequences questionnaire with adolescents and young adults. Psychological Assessment 2003; 15: 163–172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orford J. Addiction as excessive appetite. Addiction 2001; 96: 15–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlman MY, Wernicke R, Thorndike F, Haaga DAF. Stages of change in smoking cessation: A comparison of expectancies among precontemplators and contemplators. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy 2004; 22: 131–147
   Google Scholar
• Peters E, Slovic P. The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1996; 26: 1427–1453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer BA, Velicer WF, Redding CA, Prokhorov AV, Rossi JS, Pallonen UE, Meier KS. Stage of change, decisional balance, and temptations for smoking measurement and validation in a large, school-based population of adults. Addictive Behaviors 2001; 26: 551–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Guadagnoli E, Rossi JS, DiClemente CC. Patterns of change: Dynamic typology applied to smoking cessation. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1991; 26: 83–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooke SE, Hine DW, Thorsteinsson EB. Implicit cognition and substance use: A meta-analysis. Addictive Behaviors 2008, DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis 2004; 24: 311–322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Finucane M, Peters E, MacGregor DG. The affect heuristic. Heuristics and biases, T Gilovich, D Griffin, D Kahneman. Cambridge University Press, New York 2002; 397–420
   Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Peters E, Finucane ML, MacGregor DG. Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychology. Special Issue: Basic and Applied Decision Making in Cancer Control 2005; 24(4)S35–S40
   Google Scholar
• Stacy AW. Memory association and ambiguous cues in models of alcohol and marijuana use. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 1995; 3: 183–194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacy AW. Memory activation and expectancy as prospective predictors of alcohol and marijuana use. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1997; 106: 61–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich KE, West RF. Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1998; 127(2)161–188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thewissen R, van den Hout M, Havermans RC, Jansen A. Context-dependency of cue-elicited urge to smoke. Addiction 2005; 100: 387–396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thush C, Wiers RW, Ames SL, Grenard JL, Sussman S, Stacy AW. Interactions between implicit and explicit cognition and working memory capacity in the prediction of alcohol use in at-risk adolescents. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2008; 94: 116–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer WF, DiClemente CC, Prokhorov AV, Brandenburg N. Decisional balance measures for assessing and predicting smoking scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1985; 48: 1279–1289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters AJ, Shiffman S, Sayette MA, Paty JA, Gwaltney CJ, Balabanis MH. Attentional bias predicts outcome in smoking cessation. Health Psychology 2003; 22: 378–387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West R, Hardy A. Theory of addiction. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA 2006
   Google Scholar
• Wiers RW, Stacy AW. Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2006
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc RB. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist 1980; 35: 151–175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar