Qualitative study of welcome houses: a recent initiative designed to improve retention in therapeutic communities

References

• Aslan L. 2013. Phoenix futures: a review of the 2009 residential strategy. London: Phoenix Futures.
   Google Scholar
• Broekaert E. 2006. What future for the therapeutic community in the field of addiction? A view from Europe. Addiction. 101:1677–1678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darke S, Campbell G, Popple G. 2012. Retention, early drop-out and treatment completion among therapeutic community admissions. Drug Alcohol Rev. 31:64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condelli WS. 1994. Domains of variables for understanding and improving retention in therapeutic communities. Int J Addict. 29:593–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debaere V, Vanheule S, Inslegers R. 2014. Beyond the ‘black box’ of the therapeutic community for substance abusers: a participant observation study on the treatment process. Addict Res Theory. 22:251–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leon G. 2000. The therapeutic community: theory, model and method. New York: Springer Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• De Leon G, Hawke J, Jainchill N, Melnick G. 2000. Therapeutic communities. Enhancing retention in treatment using “Senior Professor” staff. J Subst Abuse Treat. 19:375–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goethals I, Soyez V, Melnick G, De Leon G, Broekaert E. 2011. Essential elements of treatment: a comparative study between European and American therapeutic communities for addiction. Subst Use Misuse. 46:1023–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goethals I, Vanderplasschen W, Vandevelde S, Broekaert E. 2012. Fixed and dynamic predictors of treatment process in therapeutic communities for substance abusers in Belgium. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 7:43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goethals I, Vanderplasschen W, Vandevelde S, Broekaert E. 2015. Core characteristics, treatment process and retention in therapeutic communities for addictions: a summary of four studies. Int J Therap Commun. 3:89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. 1961a. On the characteristics of total institutions. In: Cressey, D.R, editor. The prison: studies in institutional organization and change. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. 1961b. Asylums. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D, Rolfe A. 1999. Treatment retention and 1 year outcomes for residential programmes in England. Drug Alcohol Depend. 57:89–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison SR, Toriello P, Pavluck A, Ellis R, Pedersen E, Gaiennie R, Kissinger P. 2007. The impact of a brief induction on short-term continuation in a therapeutic community. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 33:147–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard RL, Craddock SG, Flynn P, Anderson J, Etheridge R. 1997. Overview of one-year outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav. 11:279–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joe GW, Simpson DD, Broome KM. 1998. Effects of readiness for drug abuse treatment on client retention and assessment of process. Addiction. 93:1177–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen J, Oliver P, Rowse G, Mathers N. 2001. Residential rehabilitation for drug users: a review of 13 months' intake to a therapeutic community. Fam Pract. 18:545–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang MA, Belenko S. 2000. Predicting retention in a residential drug treatment alternative to prison program. J Subst Abuse Treat. 19:145–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malivert M, Fatséas M, Denis C, Langlois E, Auriacombe M. 2012. Effectiveness of therapeutic communities: a systematic review. Eur Addict Res. 18:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier P. 2005. A national survey of retention in residential rehabilitation services. London: National Treatment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Moos RH, Moos BS, Andrassy JM. 1999. Outcomes of four treatment approaches in community residential programs for patients with substance use disorders. Psych Serv. 50:1577–1583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Treatment Agency. 2012. The role of residential rehab in an integrated drug treatment system [Internet]. Accessed 12/05/2016 from http://www.NTA.nhs.uk/uploads/roleofresi-rehab.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Neale J. 2016. Iterative categorisation (IC): a systematic technique for analysing qualitative data. Addiction. 11:1096–1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton-Howes G, Stanley J. 2015. Patient characteristics and predictors of completion in residential treatment for substance use disorders. BJ Psych Bull. 39:221–227.
   Google Scholar
• NICE. 2007. Drug misuse: psychosocial interventions. Clinical Guideline 51. UK: National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health.
   Google Scholar
• Ogborne AC, Melotte C. 1977. An evaluation of a therapeutic community for former drug users. Br J Addict Alcohol Other Drugs. 72:75–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ravndal E, Vaglum P. 1994. Why do drug abusers leave the therapeutic community? Problems with attachment and identification in a hierarchical treatment community. Nordic J Psych. 48:4–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L. 1994. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: A. Bryman & R. Burgess, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; p. 173–194.
   Google Scholar
• Ronel N, Elisha E, Timor U, Chen G. 2013. What do our clients say? Residents’ perceptions of recovery in Retorno – a Jewish therapeutic community. Addict Res Theory. 21:295–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansone J. 1980. Retention patterns in a therapeutic community for the treatment of drug abuse. Int J Addict. 15:711–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott S. 2010. Revisiting the TI: performative regulation in the reinventive institution. Sociology. 44:213–231.
   Google Scholar
• Smith LA, Gates S, Foxcroft D. 2006. Therapeutic communities for substance related disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; CD005338.
   Google Scholar
• Staiger PK, Kyrios M, Williams JS, Kambouropoulos N, Howard A, Gruenert S. 2014. Improving the retention rate for residential treatment of substance abuse by sequential intervention for social anxiety. BMC Psych. 14:43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toon P, Lynch R. 1994. Change in therapeutic communities in the UK. In: J. Strang & M. Gossop, editors. Heroin addiction and drug policy: the British system. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 231–239.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderplasschen W, Colpaert K, Autrique M, Rapp RC, Pearce S, Broekaert E, Vandevelde S. 2013. Therapeutic communities for addictions: a review of their effectiveness from a recovery-oriented perspective [Internet]. Scientific World J. Article ID 427817. Accessed 06/05/2016 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/427817.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderplasschen W, Vandevelde S, Broekaert E. 2014. Therapeutic communities for addictions in Europe. Available evidence, current practices and future challenges [Internet]. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), Lisbon, Portugal. EMCDDA: Lisbon. Accessed 06/05/2016 from http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/779/TDXD14015ENN_final_467020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vandevelde D. 2014. De Kiem: improvement makes a difference. Australasian Therapeutic Communities Association Conference, Sydney Australia, 13–16 October 2014. ATCA: Australia http://events.atca.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/De-kiem-improvement-makes-a-difference.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vandevelde S, De Maeyer J, De Ruysscher C, Bryssinck D, Meesen D, Vanderstraeten J, Broekaert E. 2015. Villa Voortman: Carte Blanche or not? Int J Therap Comm. 36:62–73.
   Google Scholar