3,934
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editor's Choice

‘Alcohol short-circuits important part of the brain’: Swedish newspaper representations of biomedical alcohol research

Pages 177-187 | Received 25 Apr 2016, Accepted 19 Sep 2016, Published online: 07 Nov 2016

References

  • Ajagán-Lester L, Ledin P, Rahm H. 2003. Intertextualiteter. In: Englund B, Ledin, P, editors. Teoretiska perspektiv på sakprosa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Agrawal R, Allamani A, Arvers P, Beccaria F, Berridge V, Blomqvist J, Boniface S, Bruno R, Buchanan J, Bühringer G, et al. 2014. Addiction: not just brain malfunction. Nature. 507:40. doi: 10.1038/507040e.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 3:77–101.
  • Campbell N. 2011. The metapharmacology of the ‘Addicted Brain’. J History Present. 1:194–218.
  • Campbell N. 2012. Medicalization and biomedicalization: does the diseasing of addiction fit the frame? In: Netherland J, editor. Critical perspectives on addiction. Netherland: Emerald Publishing; p. 3–25.
  • Connolly-Ahern C, Broadway SC. 2008. To booze or not to booze? Newspaper coverage of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders. Sci Commun. 29:362–385.
  • Conrad P. 1997. Public eyes and private genes: historical frames, news constructions, and social problems. Soc Prob. 44:139–154.
  • Conrad P. 1999. Uses of expertise: sources, quotes and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news. Public Understand Sci. 8:285–302.
  • Conrad P. 2001. Genetic optimism: framing genes and mental illness in the news. Cult Med Psychiatry. 25:225–247.
  • Conrad P, Schneider J. 1980. Deviance and medicalization: from badness to sickness. St. Louis: Mosby.
  • Dahlstrom M. 2014. Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 111(Suppl 4):13614–13620.
  • Edman J, Olsson B. 2014. The Swedish drug problem: conceptual understanding and problem handling, 1839–2011. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs. 31:503–526.
  • Fairclough N. 1995. Media discourse. London & New York: Bloomsbury.
  • Finer D, Tomson G, Björkman N-M. 1997. Ally, advocate, analyst, agenda-setter? Positions and perceptions of Swedish medical journalists. Patient Educ Couns. 30:71–81.
  • Gamson W, Modigliani A. 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. Am J Sociol. 95:1–37.
  • Goffman E. 1974. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
  • Hacking I. 2000. The social construction of what ? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Hansen A. 2006. Tampering with nature: ‘Nature’ and ‘the natural’ in media coverage of genetics and biotechnology. Media Cult Soc. 28:811–834.
  • Hansen A, Gunter B. 2007. Constructing public and political discourse on alcohol issues: towards a framework for analysis. Alcohol Alcohol. 42:150–157.
  • Hellman M, Majamäki M, Rolando S, Bujalski M, Lemmens P. 2015. What causes addiction problems? Environmental, biological, and constitutional explanations in press portrayals from four European welfare societies. Subst Use Misuse. 50:419–438.
  • Hickman T. 2014. Target America: visual culture, neuroimaging, and the ‘hijacked brain’ theory of addiction. Past Present. 222 (Suppl 9):207–226.
  • Kline K. 2006. A decade of research on health content in the media: the focus on health challenges and sociocultural context and attendant informational and ideological problems. J Health Commun. 11:43–59.
  • Koller V, Wodak R. 2008. Introduction: shifting boundaries and emergent public spheres. In: Ruth Wodak, Veronika Koller, editors. Handbook of communication in the public sphere. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; p. 1–17.
  • Lakoff G, Johnson M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lupton D. 2003. Medicine as culture: illness, disease and the body in Western societies. New York: Sage.
  • McRobbie A, Thornton S. 1995. Rethinking moral panic for multi-mediated social worlds. Br J Sociol. 46:559–574.
  • Midanik L, Room R. 2005. Contributions of social science to the alcohol field in an era of biomedicalization. Soc Sci Med. 60:1107–1116.
  • Nature. 2014. Animal farm [editorial]. Nature. 506:5.
  • Nelkin D. 1995; rev ed. Selling science: how the press covers science and technology? New York: WH Freeman & Co.
  • Nelkin D. 2001. Molecular metaphors: the gene in popular discourse. Nat Rev Genet. 2:555–559.
  • Netherland J. 2012. Introduction: sociology and the shifting landscape of addiction. In: Critical perspectives on addiction. Bingley: Emerald Publishing; p. xi–xxv.
  • O’Mahony P, Schäfer M. 2005. The ‘Book of Life’ in the press: comparing German and Irish media discourse on human genome research. Soc Stud Sci. 35:99–130.
  • Petersen A, Anderson A, Allan S. 2005. Science fiction/science fact: medical genetics in news stories. New Genet Soc. 24:337–353.
  • Pickersgill M. 2009. Between soma and society: neuroscience and the ontology of psychopathy. Biosocieties. 4:45–60.
  • Pickersgill M. 2013. The social life of the brain: neuroscience in society. Curr Sociol. 61:322–340.
  • Pickersgill M, Cunningham-Burley S, Martin P. 2011. Constituting neurologic subjects: neuroscience, subjectivity and the mundane significance of the brain. Subjectivity. 4:346–365.
  • Rehm J, Mathers C, Popova S, Thavorncharoensap M, Teerawattananon Y, Patra J. 2009. Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. Lancet. 373:2223–2233.
  • Reinarman C. 2005. Addiction as accomplishment: the discursive construction of disease. Addict Res Theory. 13:307–320.
  • Rose N. 1999. Governing the soul. 2nd ed. London: Free Association Books.
  • Rose N. 2001. The politics of life itself. Theory Cult Soc. 18:1–30.
  • Rose N. 2007. Molecular politics, somatic ethics and the spirit of biocapital. Soc Theory Health. 5:3–29.
  • Saguy A, Almeling R. 2008. Fat in the fire: science, the news media and ‘the obesity epidemic’. Sociol Forum. 23:53–83.
  • Scheufele D, Tewksbury D. 2006. Framing, agenda setting, and priming: the evolution of three media effects models. J Commun. 57:9–20.
  • Schudson M. 1989. The sociology of news production. Media Cult Soc. 11:263–282.
  • Schudson M. 2011. The sociology of news. 2nd ed. London: Norton.
  • Semino E. 2008. Metaphor in discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Scott M, Lyman S. 1968. Accounts. Am Sociol Rev. 33:46–62.
  • Strömbäck J, Karlsson M, Hopmann DN. 2012. Determinants of news content: comparing journalists’ perceptions of the normative and actual impact of different event properties when deciding what’s news. J Stud. 13:718–728.
  • Van Dijk T. 1988. News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Van Gorp B. 2007. The constructionist approach to framing: bringing culture back in. J Commun. 57:60–78.
  • Vetenskap & Allmänhet. 2014. Fusk och förtroende: Om mediers forskningsrapportering och förtroendet för forskning. VA-report 2014:3. Stockholm: Vetenskap & Allmänhet.
  • Vetenskap & Allmänhet. 2015. VA-barometern 2015/16. VA-report 2015:6. Stockholm: Vetenskap & Allmänhet.
  • Vidal F. 2009. Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. Hist Hum Sci. 22:5–36.
  • Winter K. 2016. Coproduction of scientific addiction knowledge in everyday discourse. Contemporary Drug Problems. 43:25–46.

Newspaper articles

  • Asker A. (2009) ‘How is alcoholism treated?’ Svenska Dagbladet, September 1, 2009.
  • Bojs K. (1997) “Drugs give a sense of reward”. Dagens Nyheter, September 7, 1997.
  • Bojs K. (1998) “Hereditary connection alcoholism – violence: Newfound gene”. Dagens Nyheter, November 17, 1998.
  • Björk R. (1999) “Sun, wind – and alcohol”. Expressen July 26, 1999.
  • Bojs K. (2000) “There are different types of alcoholics”. Dagens Nyheter, December 2, 2000.
  • Bojs K. (2003) “Sober worms raise hopes for alcoholism medication”. Dagens Nyheter, December 14, 2003.
  • Bojs K, Lerner T. (2007) “Genetic test can find the right alcohol medication & Medication takes away the craving for alcohol”. Dagens Nyheter, February 18, 2007.
  • Bratt A. (2007) “Epilepsy medication can help alcoholic”. Dagens Nyheter, October 28, 2007.
  • Carlsson L. (2006) “Alcohol short-circuits important part of the brain”. Svenska Dagbladet, March 5, 2006.
  • Johansson A. (2010) “Drink smarter – feel better”. Dagens Nyheter, January 31, 2010.
  • Lagerblad A. (2001) “Intoxication – a quick ticket to feeling”. Svenska Dagbladet, January 2, 2001.
  • Lundberg B. (2001) “New alarming report on why alcohol is more dangerous to women”. Expressen, May 17, 2001.
  • Lutteman M. (2007) “Bad gene for men is good for women”. Svenska Dagbladet, February 8, 2007.
  • Nordgren M. (1996). “Reward systems: The inner brake governs your drinking”. Dagens Nyheter, December 10, 1996.
  • Nordgren M. (2003) “Alcohol: A drink to the reward symphony”. Dagens Nyheter, April 14, 2003.
  • Nordgren M, Lerner T. (2003) “Alcohol: Mother and son follow the same tracks”. Dagens Nyheter, April 17, 2003.
  • Sidenbladh E. (1995) “The anatomy of the misuser.” Svenska Dagbladet, November 15, 1995.
  • Sidenbladh E. (1998) “You don’t do anything you do not want to”. Svenska Dagbladet, April 23, 1998.
  • SvD (2005) “Alcohol problems may give smaller brain lobe” (no author). Svenska Dagbladet September 17, 2005.
  • SvD (2001) “Researcher receives million grant for studies of alcohol dependence” (no author). Svenska Dagbladet, February 20, 2001).
  • Svensson G. (2003) “Research on worms can cure alcohol misuse”. Aftonbladet, December 12, 2003.
  • Westin K. (1999) “New pill can reduce the craving for liquor”. Expressen, January 7, 1999.
  • Vinterhed K. (2000) “Availability creates misuse”. Dagens Nyheter, April 2, 2000.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.