Responsible gambling: a synthesis of the empirical evidence

References

• American Psychiatric Association. 1994. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Auer MM, Griffiths MD. 2013. Voluntary limit setting and player choice in most intense online gamblers: an empirical study of gambling behaviour. J Gamb Stud. 29:647–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer MM, Griffiths MD. 2014. An empirical investigation of theoretical loss and gambling intensity. J Gamb Stud. 30:879–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer MM, Griffiths MD. 2015. Testing normative and self-appraisal feedback in an online slot-machine pop-up in a real-world setting. Front Psychol. 6:339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns RL, Wells-Parker E, Chevillard I. 1997. Assessing the methodological quality of research in narrative reviews and meta-analyses. In: Bryant KJ, Windle M, West SG, editors. The science of prevention: methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association, p. 405–429.
   Google Scholar
• Bill H03697, 03697 1-157 § 21. (a) 16. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Blaszczynski A, Gainsbury SM, Karlov L. 2014. Blue gum gaming machine: an evaluation of responsible gambling features. J Gamb Stud. 30:697–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaszczynski A, Ladouceur R, Shaffer HJ. 2004. A science-based framework for responsible gambling: the Reno model. J Gamb Stud. 20:301–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkovec TD, Castonguay LG. 1998. What is the scientific meaning of empirically supported therapy? J Consult Clin Psychol. 66:136–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braverman J, LaPlante DA, Nelson SE, Shaffer HJ. 2013. Using cross-game behavioral markers for early identification of high-risk Internet gamblers. Psychol Addict Behav. 27:868–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braverman J, Shaffer HJ. 2012. How do gamblers start gambling: identifying behavioral markers for high-risk Internet gambling. Eur J Public Health. 22:273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broda A, Laplante DA, Nelson SE, Labrie RA, Bosworth LB, Shaffer HJ. 2008. Virtual harm reduction efforts for Internet gambling: effects of deposit limits on actual Internet sports gambling behavior. Harm Reduct J. 5:27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell DT, Fiske DW. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the mulitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull. 56:81–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell DT, Stanley JC. 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper H, Hedges LV, editors. 1994. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Delfabbro PH, Borgas M, King D. 2012. Venue staff knowledge of their patrons' gambling and problem gambling. J Gamb Stud. 28:155–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfabbro PH, Winefield AH. 1999. Poker-machine gambling: an analysis of within session characteristics. Br J Psychol. 90:425–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragicevic S, Percy C, Kudic A, Parke J. 2015. A descriptive analysis of demographic and behavioral data from internet gamblers and those who self-exclude from online gambling platforms. J Gamb Stud. 31:105–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennett ST, Tobler NS, Ringwait CL, Flewelling RL. 1994. How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of project DARE outcome evaluations. Am J Public Health. 84:1394–1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris J, Wynne H. 2001. The Canadian problem gambling index: final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune EE, Goodie AS. 2012. Cognitive distortions as a component and treatment focus of pathological gambling: a review. Psychol Addict Behav. 26:298–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainsbury SM, Aro D, Ball D, Tobar C, Russell A. 2015. Determining optimal placement for pop-up messages: evaluation of a live trial of dynamic warning messages for electronic gaming machines. Int Gamb Stud. 15:141–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainsbury SM, Russell A, Blaszczynski A. 2014. Are psychology university student gamblers representative of non-university students and general gamblers? A comparative analysis. J Gamb Stud. 30:11–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray HM, LaPlante DA, Shaffer HJ. 2012. Behavioral characteristics of Internet gamblers who trigger corporate responsible gambling interventions. Psychol Addict Behav. 26:527–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray HM, Matthew A, LaPlante DA, Shaffer HJ. 2015. Using opinions and knowledge to identify natural groups of gambling employees. J Gamb Stud. 31:1753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayer T, Meyer G. 2010. Internet self-exclusion: characteristics of self-excluded gamblers and preliminary evidence for its effectiveness. Int J Ment Health Addict. 9:296–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertwig R, Barron G, Weber EU, Erev I. 2004. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychol Sci. 15:534–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing N, Cherney L, Gainsbury SM, Lubman DI, Wood RT, Blaszcynski A. 2015a. Maintaining and losing control during Internet gambling: a qualitative study of gamblers' experiences. New Media Soc. 17:1075–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing N, Nuske E. 2012. Responding to problem gamblers in the venue: role conflict, role ambiguity, and challenges for hospitality staff. J Hum Resour Hospital Tour. 11:146–164.
   Google Scholar
• Hing N, Russell A, Tolchard B, Nuske E. 2015b. Are there distinctive outcomes from self-exclusion? An exploratory study comparing gamblers who have self-excluded, received counselling, or both. Int J Ment Health Addict. 13:481–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing N, Tolchard B, Nuske E, Holdsworth L, Tiyce M. 2014. A process evaluation of a self-exclusion program: a qualitative investigation from the perspective of excluders and non-Excluders. Int J Ment Health Addict. 12:509–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, M. 1997. How science takes stock: the story of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson BT, Carey MP, Marsh KL, Levin KD, Scott-Sheldon LAJ. 2003. Interventions to reduce sexual risk for the human immunodeficiency virus in adolescents, 1985–2000: a research synthesis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 157:381–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBrie RA, Nelson SE, LaPlante DA, Peller A, Caro G, Shaffer HJ. 2007. Missouri casino self-excluders: distributions across time and space. J Gamb Stud. 23:231–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladouceur R, Sévigny S. 2009. Electronic gambling machines: influence of a clock, a cash display, and a precommitment on gambling time. J Gamb Issues. 23:31–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ladouceur R, Sylvain C, Gosselin P. 2007. Self-exclusion program: a longitudinal evaluation study. J Gamb Stud. 23:85–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPlante DA, Gray HM, LaBrie RA, Kleschinsky JH, Shaffer HJ. 2012. Gaming industry employees’ responses to responsible gambling training: a public health imperative. J Gamb Stud. 28:171–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesieur H, Blume SB. 1987. The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. Am J Psychiatry. 144:1184–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosteller F, Colditz GA. 1996. Understanding research synthesis (meta-analysis). Annu Rev Public Health. 17:1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz Y, Chebat JC, Borges A. 2013. Graphic gambling warnings: how they affect emotions, cognitive responses and attitude change. J Gamb Stud. 29:507–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson SE, Kleschinsky JH, LaBrie RA, Kaplan S, Shaffer HJ. 2010. One decade of self-exclusion: Missouri casino self-excluders four to ten years after enrollment. J Gamb Stud. 26:129–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson SE, Laplante DA, Peller AJ, Schumann A, Labrie RA, Shaffer HJ. 2008. Real limits in the virtual world: self-limiting behavior of Internet gamblers. J Gamb Stud. 24:463–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 88:879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quilty LC, Avila Murati D, Bagby RM. 2014. Identifying indicators of harmful and problem gambling in a Canadian sample through receiver operating characteristic analysis. Psychol Addict Behav. 28:229–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL. 1991. Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schellinck T, Schrans T. 2004a. Gaining control: trends in the processes of change for video lottery terminal gamblers. Int Gamb Stud. 4:161–174.
   Google Scholar
• Schellinck T, Schrans T. 2004b. Identifying problem gamblers at the gambling venue: finding combinations of high confidence indicators. Gamb Res. 16:8–24.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer HJ, Gray HM, Nelson SE, LaPlante DA. in press. Technology, the Internet, and gambling: how the medium can facilitate addiction, adaptation, and intervention. In: Faust D, Faust K, Potenza MN, editors. The Oxford handbook of digital technologies and mental health. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer HJ, Hall MN, Vander Bilt J. 1999. Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: a research synthesis. Am J Public Health. 89:1369–1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer HJ, Hall MN. 1996. Estimating the prevalence of adolescent gambling disorders: a quantitative synthesis and guide toward standard gambling nomenclature. J Gamb Stud. 12:193–214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaffer HJ, Peller AJ, LaPlante DA, Nelson SE, LaBrie RA. 2010. Toward a paradigm shift in Internet gambling research: from opinion and self-report to actual behavior. Addict Res Theory. 18:270–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer HJ, Peller AJ, LaPlante DA, Nelson SE, LaBrie RA. 2011. Research using actual behavior encourages and confirms accurate self-report: a response to Griffiths’ (2010) further comments. Addict Res Theory. 19:87–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer HJ, Stanton MV, Nelson SE. 2006. Trends in gambling studies research: quantifying, categorizing, and describing citations. J Gamb Stud. 22:427–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler NS. 1986. Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs: quantitative outcome results of program participants compared to a control or comparison group. J Drug Issues. 16:537–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay N, Boutin C, Ladouceur R. 2008. Improved self-exclusion program: preliminary results. J Gamb Stud. 24:505–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RJ, West BL, Simpson RI. 2012. Prevention of problem gambling: a comprehensive review of the evidence, and identified best practices. [Internet]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10133/3121
   Google Scholar
• Xuan Z, Shaffer HJ. 2009. How do gamblers end gambling: longitudinal analysis of Internet gambling behaviors prior to account closure due to gambling related problems. J Gamb Stud. 25:239–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

• Adami N, Benini S, Boschetti A, Canini L, Maione F, Temporin M. 2013. Markers of unsustainable gambling for early detection of at-risk online gamblers. Int Gamb Stud. 13:1–17. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2012.754919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaszczynski A, Ladouceur R, Nower L. 2007. Self-exclusion: a proposed gateway to treatment model. Int Gamb Stud. 7:59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Gainsbury SM. 2014. Review of self-exclusion from gambling venues as an intervention for problem gambling. J Gamb Stud. 30:229–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainsbury SM, Blankers M, Wilkinson C, Schelleman-Offermans K, Cousijn J. 2014. Recommendations for international gambling harm-minimisation guidelines: comparison with effective public health policy. J Gamb Stud. 30:771–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing N, Nuske E. 2012. The self-exclusion experience for problem gamblers in South Australia. Aust Soc Work. 65:457–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing N, Nuske E, Holdsworth L. 2013. How gaming venue staff use behavioural indicators to assess problem gambling in patrons. J Gamb Issues. 28:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Jardin BF, Wulfert E. 2012. The use of messages in altering risky gambling behavior in experienced gamblers. Psychol Addict Behav. 26:166–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HS, Wohl MJA, Stewart MJ, Sztainert T, Gainsbury SM. 2014. Limit your time, gamble responsibly: setting a time limit (via pop-up message) on an electronic gaming machine reduces time on device. Int Gamb Stud. 14:266–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladouceur R, Blaszczynski A, Lalande DR. 2012. Pre-commitment in gambling: a review of the empirical evidence. Int Gamb Stud. 12:215–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodie C, Reith G. 2009. Responsible gambling signage on electronic gaming machines, before and after the implementation of the United Kingdom Gambling Act: an observational study. Int Gamb Stud. 9:5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Philander KS, MacKay TL. 2014. Online gambling participation and problem gambling severity: is there a causal relationship? Int Gamb Stud. 14:214–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockloff MJ, Hing N. 2012. The impact of jackpots on EGM gambling behavior: a review. J Gamb Stud. 29:775–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockloff MJ, Donaldson P, Browne M. 2015. Jackpot expiry: an experimental investigation of a new EGM player-protection feature. J Gamb Stud. 31:1505–1514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker DM, Litvin SW, Sobel RS, St-Pierre RA. 2015. Setting win limits: an alternative approach to ‘responsible gambling’? J Gamb Stud. 31:965–986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl MJA, Gainsbury S, Stewart MJ, Sztainert T. 2012. Facilitating responsible gambling: the relative effectiveness of education-based animation and monetary limit setting pop-up messages among electronic gaming machine players. J Gamb Stud. 29:703–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl MJA, Santesso DL, Harrigan K. 2013. Reducing erroneous cognition and the frequency of exceeding limits among slots players: a short (3-minute) educational animation facilitates responsible gambling. Int J Ment Health Addict. 11:409–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar