Barriers to the diffusion of Reduced Risk Drinking programs in Poland

References

• Armor DJ, Polich JM, Stambul HB. 1976. Alcoholism and treatment. Santa Monica (CA): RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour R. 2007. Doing Focus Groups. London (UK): SAGE Publications;
   Google Scholar
• Bjerge B, Brown C, Daniels G. 2016. User Perspectives. In: Kolind T, Hunt G, Thom B, editors. Handbook on drug and alcohol studies – social science perspectives. London (UK): SAGE; p. 529–542.
   Google Scholar
• Davies DL. 1962. Normal drinking in recovered alcohol addicts. Quart J Stud Alcohol. 23:94–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis AK, Rosenberg H. 2013. Acceptance of Non-Abstinence Goals by Addiction Professionals in the United States. Psychol Addict Behav. 27:1102–1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawe S, Richmond R. 1997. Controlled drinking as a treatment goal in Australian alcohol treatment agencies. J Subst Abuse Treat. 14:81–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan M, Heather N. 1997. Acceptability of the controlled drinking goal among alcohol treatment agencies in New South Wales, Australia. J Stud Alcohol. 58:253–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckert F. 1989. Controlled drinking: a complicated and contradictory field. In: Duckert F, Koski-Jannes A, Ronnberg S, editors. Perspectives on controlled drinking. Helsinki: Nordic Council for Alcohol and Drug Research; p. 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Edlund M. 2009. Perceived need for treatment for alcohol use disorders: results from two national surveys. Psychiatr Serv. 60:1618–1628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrence R. 2001. Diffusion theory and drug use. Addiction. 96:165–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudała J. 2014. Redukcja szkód jako cel leczenia osób uzależnionych od alkoholu? Świat Problemów. 5:9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gotham HJ. 2004. Diffusion of mental health and substance abuse treatments: development, dissemination, and implementation. Clin Psychol Sci Prac. 11:160–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi S, Maesato H, Yoshimura A, Matsushita S. 2014. Acceptance of controlled drinking among treatment specialists of alcohol dependence in Japan. Alcohol Alcohol. 4:447–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingemann H, Bergmark A. 2006. The legitimacy of addiction treatment in a world of smart people. Addiction. 101:1230–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingemann H, Klingemann H-D. 1999. National treatment systems in global perspective. Eur Addict Res. 5:109–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingemann H, Rosenberg H. 2009. Acceptance and therapeutic practice of controlled drinking as an outcome goal by Swiss alcohol treatment programmes. Eur Addict Res. 15:121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingemann H, Storbjörk J. 2016. The treatment response: systemic features, paradigms and socio-cultural frameworks. In: Kolind T, Hunt G, Thom B, editors. Handbook on drug and alcohol studies – social science perspectives. London (UK): SAGE; p. 260–286.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann H, Dampz M, Perret H. 2010. Controlled Drinking Programs in Switzerland: a look into the black box. Suchttherapie. 11:18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingemann J. 2016. Acceptance of reduced-risk drinking as a therapeutic goal within the Polish alcohol treatment system. Alcohol Alcohol. 51: 436–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingemann JI. 2010. Horyzonty zmiany zachowania nałogowego w Polsce. Warszawa: UW IPSiR, Prace Katedry Socjologii Norm, Dewiacji i kontroli Społecznej, XI.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann JI. 2013. Iluzja polityki społecznej opartej na dowodach naukowych. Przykład zjawiska uzależnienia od alkoholu. Normy, Dewiacje i Kontrola Społeczna. XIV:139–155.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen HK, Roman PM. 2015. Innovation attributes and adoption decisions: perspectives from leaders of a national sample of addiction treatment organizations. J Subst Abuse Treat. 49:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körkel J. 2006. Behavioural self-management with problem drinkers: one-year follow-up of a controlled drinking group approach. Addict Res Theory. 14:35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour B. 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University press.
   Google Scholar
• Luquiens A, Reynaud M, Aubin HJ. 2011. Is controlled drinking an acceptable goal in the treatment of alcohol dependence? A survey of French alcohol specialists. Alcohol Alcohol. 46:586–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mico JL, Masip P, Domingo D. 2013. To wish impossible things* Convergence as a process of diffusion of innovations in an actor-network. Int Commun Gazette. 75:118–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WR. 1978. Behavioral treatment of problem drinkers: a comparative outcome study of three controlled drinking therapies. J Consult Clin Psychol. 46:74–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills KC, Sobell MB, Schaefer HH. 1971. Training social drinking as an alternative to abstinence for alcoholics. Behavior Ther. 2:18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochaska JO, Prochaska JM. 1999. Why don’t continents move? Why don’t people change? J Psychother. 9:83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Radwan L, Kinder S. 2013. Practising the diffusion of organizational routines. Environ Plan. 45:2442–2458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. 2002. Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addict Behav. 27:989–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg H, Davis A. 2014. Differences in the acceptability of non-abstinence goals by type of drug among American substance abuse clinicians. J Subst Abuse treat. 46:214–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg H, Melville J. 2005. Controlled drinking and controlled drug use as outcome goals in British treatment services. Addict Res Theory. 13:85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg H, Devine EG, Rothrock N. 1996. Acceptance of moderate drinking by alcoholism treatment services in Canada. J Stud Alcohol. 57:559–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson E, Wallander L. 2015. Perceptions of treatment needs: a factorial survey of Swedish addiction care practitioners. Addict Res Theory. 23:469–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuler M, Puttaiah S, Mojtabai R, Crum R. 2015. Perceived barriers to treatment for alcohol problems: a latent class analysis. Psychiatr Serv. 66:1221–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobell MB, Sobell LC. 1973. Alcoholics treated by individualized behavior therapy: one year treatment outcome. Behav Res Ther. 11:599–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone D. 2012. Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Stud. 33:483–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Świątkiewicz G, Morawski J. 1992. Samopomocowe kluby abstynenckie. Charakterystyka empiryczna. Alkoholizm i Narkomania. 9:25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Świątkiewicz G, Zieliński A. 1998. Alcoholics Anonymous in Poland. In Eisenbach-Stangl I, Rosenqvist P, editors. Diversity in unity. Studies of alcoholics anonymous in eight societies. Helsinki: NAD; NAD Publication No. 33. p. 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlbeck K. 2010. Moving towards integrated addiction treatment systems. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs. 27:699–702.
   Google Scholar
• Witzel A. 2000. The Problem-centered Interview. Forum Qualitat Social Res [Internet]. 1: Available from: http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1132
   Google Scholar