The reliability of drug use indicators collected from a prisoner sample using the life events calendar method

References

• Axinn WG, Pearce LD, Ghimire D. 1999. Innovations in life history calendar applications. Soc Sci Res. 28:243–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belli RF. 1998. The structure of autobiographic memory and the event history calendar: potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys. Memory. 6:383–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belli RF, Alwin DF, Stafford FP. 2009. The application of calendar and time diary methods in the collection of life course data. In: F.P. Stafford & D.F. Alwin, Editors. Calendar and time diary methods in life course research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage, pp. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Belli RF, Shay WL, Stafford FP. 2001. Event history calendars and question list surveys: a direct comparison of interviewing methods. Public Opin Q. 65:45–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradburn NM, Rips LJ, Shevell SK. 1987. Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science. 236:157–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey KB, Carey MP, Maisto SA, Henson JM. 2004. Temporal stability of the timeline followback interview for alcohol and drug use with psychiatric outpatients. J Stud Alcohol. 65:774–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Thornton A, Freedman D, Amell JW, Harrington H, Smeijers J, Silva PA. 1996. The life history calendar: a research and clinical assessment method for collecting retrospective event-history data. Int J Method Psychiat Res. 6:101–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015. Today’s Heroin Epidemic Infographics. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/heroin/infographic.html
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 20:37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darke S. 1998. Self-report among injecting drug users: a review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 51:253–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMatteo D, Filone S, Davis J. 2015. Substance use and crime. In: Cutler, B.L. editors. APA handbook of forensic psychology: individual and situational influences in criminal and civil contexts. Vol. 1. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association, pp. 325–349.
   Google Scholar
• Dex S. 1991. Life and work history analyses. In: S. Dex, editor. Life and work history analyses: Qualitative and quantitative developments. New York (NY): Routledge, pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fals-Stewart W, O’Farrell TJ, Freitas TT, McFarlin SK, Rutigliano P. 2000. The timeline followback reports of psychoactive substance use by drug-abusing patients: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 68:134–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose MR, Cooper AD, Snyder HN. 2014. Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 States in 2005: Patterns from 2005-2010 (NCJ-244205). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrman RN, Robbins SJ. 1994. Reliability and validity of 6-month timeline reports of cocaine and heroin use in a methadone population. J Consult Clin Psychol. 62:843–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazel S, Bains P, Doll H. 2006. Substance abuse and dependence in prisoners: a systematic review. Addiction. 101:181–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fikowski J, Marchand K, Palis H, Oviedo-Joekes E. 2014. Feasibility of applying the life history calendar in a population of chronic opioid users to identify patterns of drug use and addiction treatment. Subst Abuse. 8:73–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freedman D, Thornton A, Camburn D, Alwin D, Young-DeMarco L. 1988. The life history calendar: a technique for collecting retrospective data. Sociol Methodol. 18:37–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoeben EM, Bernasco W, Weerman FM, Pauwels L, Van Halem S. 2014. The space-time budget method in criminological research. Crime Sci. 3:15.
   Google Scholar
• Holland BS, Copenhaver MD. 1988. Improved Bonferroni-type multiple testing procedures. Psychol Bull. 104:145–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hser YI, Hamilton A, Niv N. 2009. Understanding drug use over the life course: past, present, and future. J Drug Issues. 39:231–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hser YI, Hoffman V, Grella CE, Anglin MD. 2001. A 33-year follow-up of narcotics addicts. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 58:503–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hser Y, Longshore D, Anglin MD. 2007. The life course perspective on drug use: a conceptual framework for understanding drug use trajectories. Eval Rev. 31:515–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie DL. 2001. Sentencing and corrections in the 21st century: setting the stage for the future. University of Maryland, College Park: Md., Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Evaluation Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Morris NA, Slocum LA. 2010. The validity of self-reported prevalence, frequency, and timing of arrest: An evaluation of data collected using a life event calendar. J Res Crime Delinq. 47:210–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumola CJ, Karberg JC. 2006. Drug use and dependence, state and federal prisoners, 2004. Washington (DC): US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). 2016. 2016-2020 Strategic Plan (preliminary draft). [Internet]. Available from: http://www.drugabuse.gov/sites/default/files/2016-2020nidastrategicplandraft_092515forpubliccomment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norberg MM, Mackenzie J, Copeland J. 2012. Quantifying cannabis use with the timeline followback approach: a psychometric evaluation. Drug Alcohol Depend. 121:247–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast M, Li L, Evans E, Hall E. 2013. Consistency in self-reports of drug use frequency by high-risk offenders over a 5-year interval. Prison J. 93:375–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts J, Horney J. 2010. The life event calendar method in criminological research. In: A.R. Piquero & D. Weisburd, editors. Handbook of quantitative criminology. New York (NY): Springer, pp. 289–312.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts J, Wells W. 2010. The validity of criminal justice contacts reported by inmates: a comparison of self-reported data with official prison records. J Crim Justice. 38:1031–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson SM, Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Leo GI. 2014. Reliability of the timeline followback for cocaine, cannabis, and cigarette use. Psychol Addict Behav. 28:154–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobell LC, Sobell MB. 1992. Timeline follow-back: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: R.Z. Litten & J.P. Allen, editors. Measuring alcohol consumption: psychosocial and biochemical methods. New York, NY: Humana Press, pp. 41–72.
   Google Scholar
• Sudman S, Bradburn NM, Schwarz N. 1996. Thinking about answers: the application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan CJ, McGloin JM. 2014. Looking back to move forward: Some thoughts on measuring crime and delinquency over the past 50 years. J Res Crime Delinq. 51:445–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton JE. 2010. A review of the life-events calendar method for criminological research. J Crim Justice. 38:1038–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton JE, Bellair PE, Kowalski BR, Light R, Hutcherson DT. 2011. Reliability and validity of prisoner self-reports gathered using the life event calendar method. J Quant Criminol. 27:151–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberry TP, Krohn M. 2000. The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice, 4. Washington (DC): National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office On Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2016. For source data see: https://data.unodc.org/, and for data visualization of UNODC. [Internet]. Available from: http://recoverybrands.com/drugs-in-america-vs-europe/.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2014. Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Vierra AJ, Garrett JM. 2005. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Family Med. 37:360–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkow ND. 2014. America’s Addiction to Opioids: Heroin and Prescription Drug Abuse. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). [Internet]. Available from: http://www.drugabuse.gov/about-nida/legislative-activities/testimony-to-congress/2015/americas-addiction-to-opioids-heroin-prescription-drug-abuse.
   Google Scholar