Capturing drinking and nightlife behaviours and their social and physical context with a smartphone application – investigation of users’ experience and reactivity

References

• Bae S, Chung T, Ferreira D, Dey AK, Suffoletto B. 2018. Mobile phone sensors and supervised machine learning to identify alcohol use events in young adults: implications for just-in-time adaptive interventions. Addict Behav. 83:42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolger N, Davis A, Rafaeli E. 2003. Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. Annu Rev Psychol. 54(1):579–616. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bot SM, Engels RCME, Knibbe RA, Meeus WHJ. 2007. Pastime in a pub: observations of young adults’ activities and alcohol consumption. Addict Behav. 32(3):491–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter RW, Wycoff AM, Trull TJ. 2016. Ambulatory assessment: new adventures in characterizing dynamic processes. Assessment. 23(4):414–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116632341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp JD, Madden DR, Mooney DD, Dahlquist KE. 2017. Examining the social ecology of a bar-crawl: an exploratory pilot study. Plos One. 12(9):e0185238. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M, Larson R. 2014. Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. In Csikszentmihalyi M, editor. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; p. 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_3
   Google Scholar
• Demant J, Landolt S. 2014. Youth drinking in public places: the production of drinking spaces in and outside nightlife areas. Urban Studies. 51(1):170–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013484532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietze PM, Livingston M, Callinan S, Room R. 2014. The big night out: what happens on the most recent heavy drinking occasion among young Victorian risky drinkers?: High-risk drinking by young Victorians. Drug Alcohol Rev. 33(4):346–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulin PL, Alvarado CE, Fitterling JM, Gonzalez VM. 2017. Comparisons of alcohol consumption by timeline follow back vs. smartphone-based daily interviews. Addict Res Theory. 25(3):195–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2016.1239081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freisthler B, Lipperman-Kreda S, Bersamin M, Gruenewald PJ. 2014. Tracking the when, where, and with whom of alcohol use: integrating ecological momentary assessment and geospatial data to examine risk for alcohol-related problems. Alcohol Res Curr Rev. 36(1):29–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin MS, Velicer WF, Intille SS. 2008. Telemetric monitoring in the behavior sciences. Behav Res. 40(1):328–341. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann WB. 2003. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J Res Pers. 37(6):504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guéguen N, Jacob C, Le Guellec H, Morineau T, Lourel M. 2008. Sound level of environmental music and drinking behavior: a field experiment with beer drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 32(10):1795–1798. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00764.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hufford MR, Shields AL, Shiffman S, Paty J, Balabanis M. 2002. Reactivity to ecological momentary assessment: an example using undergraduate problem drinkers. Psychol Addict Behav. 16(3):205–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.16.3.205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones A, Remmerswaal D, Verveer I, Robinson E, Franken IHA, Wen CKF, Field M. 2018. Compliance with ecological momentary assessment protocols in substance users: a meta-analysis: compliance in substance users. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy AP, Epstein DH, Phillips KA, Preston KL. 2013. Sex differences in cocaine/heroin users: drug-use triggers and craving in daily life. Drug Alcohol Depend. 132(1-2):29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.12.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr WC, Greenfield TK. 2007. Distribution of alcohol consumption and expenditures and the impact of improved measurement on coverage of alcohol sales in the 2000 national alcohol survey. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 31(10):1714–1722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00467.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiukkonen N, Blom J, Dousse O, Gatica-Perez D, Laurila J. 2010. Towards rich mobile phone datasets: Lausanne data collection campaign. Proc. ICPS, Berlin. 68.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntsche E, Labhart F. 2013. ICAT: development of an internet-based data collection method for ecological momentary assessment using personal cell phones. Eur J Psychol Assess. 29(2):140–148. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labhart F, Anderson KG, Kuntsche E. 2017. The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak: why young people drink more than intended on weekend nights-an event-level study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 41(11):1961–1969. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labhart F, Graham K, Wells S, Kuntsche E. 2013. Drinking before going to licensed premises: an event-level analysis of predrinking, alcohol consumption, and adverse outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 37(2):284–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01872.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labhart F, Kuntsche E. 2017. Development and validation of the predrinking motives questionnaire: predrinking motives questionnaire. J Appl Soc Psychol. 47(3):136–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labhart F, Livingston M, Engels R, Kuntsche E. 2018. After how many drinks does someone experience acute consequences-determining thresholds for binge drinking based on two event-level studies: optimal thresholds for binge drinking. Addiction. 113(12):2235–2244. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labhart F, Santani D, Truong J, Tarsetti F, Bornet O, Landolt S, Gatica-Perez D, Kuntsche E. 2017. Development of the Geographical Proportional-to-size Street-Intercept Sampling (GPSIS) method for recruiting urban nightlife-goers in an entire city. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 20(6):721–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1293928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landolt S. 2011. Trinkräume und Treffpunkte Jugendlicher-Aushandlungsprozesse im öffentlichen Raum der Stadt Zürich. Zürich: University of Zurich, Faculty of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Lerman K. 2007. User participation in social media: Digg study. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology-Workshops; Washington (DC): IEEE Computer Society. p. 255–258.
   Google Scholar
• Luczak SE, Rosen IG, Wall TL. 2015. Development of a real-time repeated-measures assessment protocol to capture change over the course of a drinking episode. Alcohol Alcohol. 50(2):180–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agu100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons AC, McCreanor T, Goodwin I, Moewaka Barnes H. 2017. Youth drinking cultures in a digital world: alcohol, social media and cultures of intoxication. London; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Measham F. 2004. The decline of ecstasy, the rise of ‘binge’ drinking and the persistence of pleasure. Probation Journal. 51(4):309–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550504048220
   Google Scholar
• Merrill JE, Kenney SR, Barnett NP. 2017. A time-varying effect model of the dynamic association between alcohol use and consequences over the first two years of college. Addict Behav. 73:57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.04.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk RL, Heim D. 2013. Environmental context effects on alcohol-related outcome expectancies, efficacy, and norms: a field study. Psychol Addict Behav. 27(3):814–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk RL, Heim D. 2013. Panoramic projection: affording a wider view on contextual influences on alcohol-related cognitions. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 21(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk RL, Heim D. 2014. A real-time examination of context effects on alcohol cognitions. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 38(9):2454–2459. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.12504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomb ME, Swann G, Estabrook R, Corden M, Begale M, Ashbeck A, Mohr D, Mustanski B. 2018. Patterns and predictors of compliance in a prospective diary study of substance use and sexual behavior in a sample of young men who have sex with men. Assessment. 25(4):403–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116667584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman ME. 2005. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp Phys. 46(5):323–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochoa X, Duval E. 2008. Quantitative analysis of user-generated content on the web. Proceedings of WebEvolve2008: web science workshop at WWW2008. Beijing, China; p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Phan T-T, Gatica-Perez D. 2017. Healthy #fondue #dinner: analysis and inference of food and drink consumption patterns on instagram. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia - MUM ’17. Stuttgart, Germany: ACM Press. p. 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152832.3152857
   Google Scholar
• Poell T, Borra E. 2012. Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: the social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Journalism. 13(6):695–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911431533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolstad S, Adler J, Rydén A. 2011. Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? a review and meta-analysis. Value in Health. 14(8):1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santani D, Biel J-I, Labhart F, Truong J, Landolt S, Kuntsche E, Gatica-Perez D. 2016. The night is young: urban crowdsourcing of nightlife patterns. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. New York, USA: ACM. p. 427–438.
   Google Scholar
• Santani D, Do TMT, Labhart F, Landolt S, Kuntsche E, Gatica-Perez D. 2018. DrinkSense: characterizing youth drinking behavior using smartphones. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput. 17(10):15361233. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2018.2797901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santani D, Gatica-Perez D. 2013. Speaking Swiss: languages and venues in foursquare. Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on multimedia. New York, USA: ACM. p. 501–504.
   Google Scholar
• Santani D, Gatica-Perez D. 2015. Loud and trendy: crowdsourcing impressions of social ambiance in popular indoor urban places. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on multimedia. New York, USA: ACM. p. 211–220.
   Google Scholar
• Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. 2008. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 4(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StatsCounter. 2015. Mobile operating system market share worldwide. Consulté à l’adresse http://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/mobile/worldwide/2014
   Google Scholar
• Thrul J, Bühler A, Ferguson SG. 2015. An internet-based ecological momentary assessment study relying on participants’ own mobile phones: insights from a study with young adult smokers. Eur Addict Res. 21(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000363231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrul J, Labhart F, Kuntsche E. 2017. Drinking with mixed-gender groups is associated with heavy weekend drinking among young adults: Drinking groups and weekend drinking. Addiction. 112(3):432–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trull TJ, Ebner-Priemer U. 2014. The role of ambulatory assessment in psychological science. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 23(6):466–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414550706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong J. 2018a. Attending to others: how digital technologies direct young people’s nightlife. Geogr Helv. 73(2):193–201. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-193-2018
   Google Scholar
• Truong J. 2018b. Collapsing contexts: social networking technologies in young people’s nightlife. Children’s Geographies. 16(3):266–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1458214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong J, Labhart F, Santani D, Gatica-Perez D, Kuntsche E, Landolt S. 2019. The emotional entanglements of smartphones “in the field”: on social positioning, power relations, and research ethics. Area. DOI: 10.1111/area.12548
   Google Scholar