Reconceptualising the study of alcohol policy decision-making: the contribution of political science

References

• Alcohol pricing plans shelved 2013. Western Daily Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arts B, Tatenhove JV. 2004. Policy and power: a conceptual framework between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ policy idioms. Policy Sci. 37(3–4):339–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babor TF, Robaina K. 2013. Public health, academic medicine, and the alcohol industry's corporate social responsibility activities. Am J Public Health. 103(2):206–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babor TF, Caetano R, Casswell S, Edwards G, Giesbrecht N, Graham K, Rossow I. 2010. Alcohol: no ordinary commodity: research and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bashir NS, Ungar WJ. 2015. The 3-I framework: a framework for developing public policies regarding pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing in Canada. Genome. 58(12):527–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum F, Delany-Crowe T, Fisher M, MacDougall C, Harris P, McDermott D, Marinova D. 2018. Qualitative protocol for understanding the contribution of Australian policy in the urban planning, justice, energy and environment sectors to promoting health and health equity. BMJ Open. 8(9):e025358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum F, Graycar A, Delany-Crowe T, de Leeuw E, Bacchi C, Popay J, Orchard L, Colebatch H, Friel S, MacDougall C, et al. 2019. Understanding Australian policies on public health using social and political science theories: reflections from an Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia Workshop. Health Promot Int. 34(4):833–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner FR, Jones BD. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner FR, Breunig C, Green‐Pedersen C, Jones BD, Mortensen PB, Nuytemans M, Walgrave S. 2009. Punctuated equilibrium in comparative perspective. Am J Political Sci. 53(3):603–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland D. 2009. Ideas, institutions, and policy change. J Eur Public Policy. 16(5):701–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland D, Cox RH. 2011. (Eds.). Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bond L, Daube M, Chikritzhs T. 2009. Access to confidential alcohol industry documents: from ‘big tobacco ‘to ‘big booze. AMJ. 1(3):1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Breton E, De Leeuw E. 2011. Theories of the policy process in health promotion research: a review. Health Promot Int. 26(1):82–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton R, Henn C, Lavoie D, O'Connor R, Perkins C, Sweeney K, Greaves F, Ferguson B, Beynon C, Belloni A, et al. 2017. A rapid evidence review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alcohol control policies: an English perspective. Lancet. 389(10078):1558–1580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney P. 2007. Using devolution to set the agenda? Venue shift and the smoking ban in Scotland. Br J Pol Int Relat. 9(1):73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney P. 2009. The role of ideas in policy transfer: the case of UK smoking bans since devolution. J Eur Pub Pol. 16(3):471–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney P, Studlar D. 2014. Public health policy in the United Kingdom: after the war on tobacco, is a war on. Alcohol brewing? World Med Health Policy. 6(3):308–323.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell JL. 1998. Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory Soc. 27(3):377–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen MB, Schmidt VA. 2016. Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. J Eur Pub Pol. 23(3):318–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong D, Druckman JN. 2007. Framing theory. Annu Rev Polit Sci. 10(1):103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell A. 2019. Powers and policy levers: what works in delivering Welsh Government policies? https://www.wcpp.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Powers-and-Policy-Levers-Practitioner-Report-FINAL-May-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper PD. 2010. Quiet politics and business power: corporate control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Leeuw E, Clavier C, Breton E. 2014. Health policy–why research it and how: health political science. Health Res Policy Syst. 12(1):55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunlop CA, Radaelli CM. 2018. The lessons of policy learning: types, triggers, hindrances and pathologies. Policy Polit. 46(2):255–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fafard P. 2015. Beyond the usual suspects: using political science to enhance public health policy making. J Epidemiol Community Health. 69(11):1129–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frohlich KL, Mykhalovskiy E, Miller F, Daniel M. 2004. Advancing the population health agenda. Can J Public Health. 95(5):392–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs D, Lederer MM. 2007. The power of business. Bus Polit. 9(3):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon F, Bergeron P, Clavier C, Fafard P, Martin E, Blouin C. 2017. Why and how political science can contribute to public health? Proposals for collaborative research avenues. Int J Health Policy Manag. 6(9):495–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornall J. 2014. Alcohol and public health. Under the influence. BMJ. 348:f7646.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Government of Wales. 2014. Listening to you: your health matters consultation on proposals for a Public Health Bill. https://senedd.wales/research%20documents/rn-14-023%20white%20papers%20health/rn14-023.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Wales. 2017. Public Health (Minimum Price For Alcohol) (Wales) Bill Explanatory Memorandum incorporating the Regulatory Impact Assessment and Explanatory Notes. http://www.assembly.wales/laid%20documents/pri-ld11246-em/pri-ld11246-em-e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker JS, Pierson P. 2010. Winner-take-all politics: public policy, political organization, and the precipitous rise of top incomes in the United States. Pol Soc. 38(2):152–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker JS, Pierson P. 2011. Winner-take-all politics: how washington made the rich richer–and turned its back on the middle class. New York (NY): Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Hall PA. 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comp Polit. 25(3):275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall PA. 1997. The role of interests, institutions and ideas in the comparative political economy. In: Irving MI, Zuckerman AS, editors. Comparative politics: rationality, culture, and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 175–207.
   Google Scholar
• Hall PA, Taylor RCR. 1996. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Stud. 44(5):936–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris P, Kent J, Sainsbury P, Marie-Thow A, Baum F, Friel S, McCue P. 2018. Creating ‘healthy built environment' legislation in Australia: a policy analysis. Health Promot Int. 33(6):1090–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris P, Kent J, Sainsbury P, Riley E, Sharma N, Harris E. 2019. Healthy urban planning: an institutional policy analysis of strategic planning in Sydney, Australia. Health Promot Int. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daz056.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris P, Sainsbury P, Kemp L. 2014. The fit between health impact assessment and public policy: practice meets theory. Soc Sci Med. 108:46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins B, Holden C. 2013. Framing the alcohol policy debate: industry actors and the regulation of the UK beverage alcohol market. Crit Policy Stud. 7(1):53–71.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins B, McCambridge J. 2014. Industry actors, think tanks, and alcohol policy in the United kingdom. Am J Public Health. 104(8):1363–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins B, McCambridge J. 2020. Policy windows and multiple streams: an analysis of alcohol pricing policy in England. Policy Polit. 48(2):315–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay C. 1997. Divided by a common language: political theory and the concept of power. Politics. 17(1):45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hay C. 2004. Ideas, interests and institutions in the comparative political economy of great transformations. Rev Int Polit Econ. 11(1):204–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heclo H. 1994. Ideas, interests and institutions. In: Dodd LC, Jillson C, editors, The dynamics of American politics: approaches and interpretations. Boulder (CO): Westview; p. 366–392
   Google Scholar
• Holden C, Hawkins B. 2013. Whisky gloss’: the alcohol industry, devolution and policy communities in Scotland. Public Policy Adm. 28(3):253–273.
   Google Scholar
• Holden C, Hawkins B, McCambridge J. 2012. Cleavages and co-operation in the UK alcohol industry: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 12:483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett M, Perl A, Ramesh M. 2009. Studying public policy: policy cycles & policy subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Immergut EM. 1990. Institutions, veto points, and policy results: a comparative analysis of health care. J Pub Pol. 10(4):391–416.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs AM, Weaver RK. 2015. When policies undo themselves: self-undermining feedback as a source of policy change. Governance. 28(4):441–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jernigan DH, Trangenstein P. 2017. Global developments in alcohol policies: Progress in implementation of the WHO global strategy to reduce the harmful use of alcohol since 2010. https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/activities/fadab/msb_adab_gas_progress_report.pdf?ua=1.
   Google Scholar
• John P. 2003. Is there life after policy streams, advocacy coalitions, and punctuations: using evolutionary theory to explain policy change? Policy Stud J. 31(4):481–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones C. 2017 Nov 06. Minimum price for alcohol is the wrong approach. The Western Mail.
   Google Scholar
• Katikireddi SV, Bond L, Hilton S. 2014. Changing policy framing as a deliberate strategy for public health advocacy: a qualitative policy case study of minimum unit pricing of alcohol. Milbank Q. 92(2):250–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katikireddi SV, Hilton S, Bonell C, Bond L. 2014. Understanding the development of minimum unit pricing of alcohol in Scotland: a qualitative study of the policy process. PLOS One. 9(3):e91185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon JW. 1995. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York (NY): HarperCollins College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Knai C, Petticrew M, Durand MA, Scott C, James L, Mehrotra A, Eastmure E, Mays N. 2015. The Public Health Responsibility deal: has a public-private partnership brought about action on alcohol reduction? Addiction. 110(8):1217–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasswell HD, Kaplan A. 2017. Power and society: a framework for political inquiry. New York (NY): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lavis JN, Ross SE, Hurley JE, Hohenadel JM, Stoddart GL, Woodward CA, Abelson J. 2002. Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. Milbank Q. 80(1):125–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman R. 2002. Ideas, institutions, and political order: explaining political change. Am Polit Sci Rev. 96(4):697–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liverani M, Hawkins B, Parkhurst JO. 2013. Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy. A systematic review. PLOS One. 8(10):e77404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenc T, Tyner EF, Petticrew M, Duffy S, Martineau FP, Phillips G, Lock K. 2014. Cultures of evidence across policy sectors: systematic review of qualitative evidence. Eur J Public Health. 24(6):1041–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenbach JP. 2014. Political determinants of health. Eur J Public Health. 24(1):2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May PJ. 1992. Policy learning and failure. J Pub Pol. 12(4):331–354.
   Google Scholar
• McCambridge J, Coleman R, McEachern J. 2019. Public health surveillance studies of alcohol industry market and political strategies: a systematic review. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 80(2):149–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCambridge J, Daube M, McKee M. 2019. Brussels Declaration: a vehicle for the advancement of tobacco and alcohol industry interests at the science/policy interface? Tob Control. 28(1):7–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCambridge J, Hawkins B, Holden C. 2013. Industry use of evidence to influence alcohol policy: a case study of submissions to the 2008 Scottish Government Consultation. PLoS Med. 10(4):e1001431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCambridge J, Hawkins B, Holden C. 2014. Vested interests in addiction research and policy. The challenge corporate lobbying poses to reducing society's alcohol problems: insights from UK evidence on minimum unit pricing. Addiction. 109(2):199–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCambridge J, Kypri K, Drummond C, Strang J. 2014. Alcohol harm reduction: corporate capture of a key concept. PLoS Med. 11(12):e1001767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCambridge J, Kypri K, Sheldon TA, Madden M, Babor TF. 2019. Advancing public health policy making through research on the political strategies of alcohol industry actors. J Pub Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdz031.
   Google Scholar
• McCambridge J, Mialon M, Hawkins B. 2018. Alcohol industry involvement in policymaking: a systematic review. Addiction (Abingdon, England). 113(9):1571–1584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta J. 2010. From “whether” to “how”: the varied roles of ideas in politics. In: Beland D, Cox RH, editors. Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Meng Y, Sadler S, Gell L, Holmes J, Brennan A. 2014. Model-based appraisal of minimum unit pricing for alcohol in Wales: an adaptation of the sheffield alcohol policy model version 3. https://gweddill.gov.wales/docs/caecd/research/2014/141208-model-based-appraisal-minimum-unit-price-alcohol-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mialon M, McCambridge J. 2018. Alcohol industry corporate social responsibility initiatives and harmful drinking: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 28(4):664–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Assembly for Wales Health. 2018. Public Health (Minimum Price for Alcohol) (Wales) Bill: Committee Stage 1 Report. https://www.assembly.wales./laid.%20documents./cr.-ld11442./crld11442.-e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Assembly for Wales Rural Development Sub-Committee. 2010. The wine, beer, cider and spirits industries. http://www.assembly.wales/Laid%20Documents/CR-LD8130%20-%20Report%20of%20the%20Rural%20Development%20Sub-committee%20on%20Wine,%20Beer,%20Cider%20and%20Spirit%20Industries-08072010-190783/cr-ld8130-e-English.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls J, Greenaway J. 2015. What is the problem?: evidence, politics and alcohol policy in England and Wales, 2010–2014. Drugs Educ Prev Pol. 22(2):135–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver K, Boaz A. 2019. Transforming evidence for policy and practice: creating space for new conversations. Palgrave Commun. 5(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Parkhurst J. 2017. The politics of evidence: from evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons C. 2003. A certain idea of Europe. Cornell: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson P. 1995. Fragmented welfare states: federal institutions and the development of social policy. Governance. 8(4):449–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson P. 1996. The new politics of the welfare state. World Pol. 48(2):143–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am Polit Sci Rev. 94(2):251–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson P, Weaver RK. 1992. Imposing losses in pension policy. In: Weaver RK Rockman BA, editors. Do Institutions matter?: Government capabilities in the United States and abroad. Washington (DC): Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pontusson J. 1995. From comparative public policy to political economy: putting political institutions in their place and taking interests seriously. Comp Political Stud. 28(1):117–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter K, Miloudi S. 2009 Mar 22. HANDS OFF! Majority of AMs reject minimum booze prices. Wales on Sunday, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Pralle SB. 2003. Venue shopping, political strategy, and policy change: the internationalization of canadian forest advocacy. J Pub Pol. 23(3):233–260.
   Google Scholar
• Real-Dato J. 2009. Mechanisms of policy change: a proposal for a synthetic explanatory framework. J Comp Pol Anal. 11(1):117–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossow I, McCambridge J. 2019. The handling of evidence in national and local policy making: a case study of alcohol industry actor strategies regarding data on on-premise trading hours and violence in Norway. BMC Public Health. 19(1):44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlager E. 2007. A comparison of frameworks, theories, and models of the policy process. In: Sabatier PA, editor. Theories of the policy process. 2nded. Boulder (CO): Westview Press; p. 293–319.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier PA, Weible C., eds. 2014. Theories of the Policy Process. 3rd ed. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider EE. 1960. The semisovereign people: a realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt VA. 2008. Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annu Rev Polit Sci. 11(1):303–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schram A. 2018. When evidence isn’t enough: Ideological, institutional, and interest-based constraints on achieving trade and health policy coherence. Global Social Policy. 18(1):62–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer JC, Lavis JN, Abelson J, Kouyaté B, Walt G. 2016. Why do policies change? Institutions, interests, ideas and networks in three cases of policy reform. Health Policy Plan. 31(9):1200–1211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogstad G, Schmidt VA. 2011. Introduction policy paradigms, transnationalism, and domestic politics. In: Skogstad G, editor. Policy paradigms, transnationalism, and domestic politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; p. 3–35.
   Google Scholar
• Smith KE. 2013. Beyond evidence based policy in public health: the interplay of ideas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith KE, Katikireddi SV. 2013. A glossary of theories for understanding policymaking. J Epidemiol Community Health. 67(2):198–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford A. 2014. Apr 2. Wales considers e-cigs and cheap booze ban. South Wales Argus.
   Google Scholar
• Stockwell T, Zhao J, Giesbrecht N, Macdonald S, Thomas G, Wettlaufer A. 2012. The raising of minimum alcohol prices in Saskatchewan, Canada: impacts on consumption and implications for public health. Am J Public Health. 102(12):e103–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thelen K. 1999. Historical Institutionalism in comparative politics. Annu Rev Polit Sci. 2(1):369–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis G. 2000. Veto players and institutional analysis. Governance. 13(4):441–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver RK, Rockman BA. 1993. Do institutions matter?: Government capabilities in the United States and abroad. Washington (DC): Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Wilks S. 2013. The political power of the business corporation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2010. Global strategy to reduce the harmful use of alcohol. https://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/14845/1/WHO_Global_strategy_reduce_alcohol.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. 2017. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017: monitoring tobacco use and prevention policies. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255874/9789241512824-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2019. Global status report on alcohol and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Young L, Everitt J. 2005. Advocacy groups. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar