Who uses custom sports betting products?

References

• Australian Government. 2001. Interactive Gambling Act 2001. [Canberra ACT (Australia)]: Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications. [accessed 2020 Jan]. https://www.communications.gov.au/what-we-do/internet/internet-governance/online-gambling
   Google Scholar
• Bowden-Jones H, Dickson C, Dunand C, Simon O, editors. 2019. Harm reduction for gambling: a public health approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman J, LaPlante DA, Nelson SE, Shaffer HJ. 2013. Using cross-game behavioral markers for early identification of high-risk internet gamblers. Psychol Addict Behav. 27(3):868–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne M, Goodwin BC, Rockloff MJ. 2018. Validation of the short gambling harm screen (SGHS): a tool for assessment of harms from gambling. J Gambl Stud. 34(2):499–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne M, Langham E, Rawat V, Greer N, Li E, Rose J, Rockloff M, Donaldson P, Thorne H, Goodwin B, et al. 2016. Assessing gambling-related harm in Victoria: a public health perspective. Melbourne (Australia): Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Crump MJ, McDonnell JV, Gureckis TM. 2013. Evaluating amazon’s mechanical turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PloS One. 8(3):e57410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon MJ, Stange M, Larche CJ, Graydon C, Fugelsang JA, Harrigan KA. 2018. Dark flow, depression and multiline slot machine play. J Gambl Stud. 34(1):73–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feess E, Müller H, Schumacher C. 2014. The favorite-longshot bias and the impact of experience. Bus Res. 7(2):217–234.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris J, Wynne HJ. 2001. The Canadian problem gambling index: final report. Ottawa (Canada): Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. 2017. Statement of principles for licensing and regulation. https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/PDF/Statement-of-principles-for-licensing-and-regulation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Goodie AS, Fortune EE. 2013. Measuring cognitive distortions in pathological gambling: review and meta-analyses. Psychol Addict Behav. 27(3):730–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanniakalager A, Newall PWS. 2019. A machine learning perspective on responsible gambling. Behavioural Public Policy.DOI:10.1017/bpp.2019.9
   Google Scholar
• Hauser DJ, Schwarz N. 2016. Attentive turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behav Res Methods. 48(1):400–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henslin JM. 1967. Craps and magic. Am J Sociol. 73(3):316–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing N, Russell AM, Vitartas P, Lamont M. 2016. Demographic, behavioural and normative risk factors for gambling problems amongst sports bettors. J Gambl Stud. 32(2):625–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaunitz L, Zhong S, Kreiner J. 2017. Beating the bookies with their own numbers-and how the online sports betting market is rigged. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1710.02824.
   Google Scholar
• Kuypers T. 2000. Information and efficiency: an empirical study of a fixed odds betting market. Appl Econ. 32(11):1353–1363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyonka EG, Schutte NS. 2018. Probability discounting and gambling: a meta‐analysis. Addiction. 113(12):2173–2181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPlante DA, Nelson SE, Gray HM. 2014. Breadth and depth involvement: understanding internet gambling involvement and its relationship to gambling problems. Psychol Addict Behav. 28(2):396–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPlante DA, Nelson SE, LaBrie RA, Shaffer HJ. 2012. The bwin. party division on addiction research collaborative. In Williams RJ, Wood RT and Parke J, editors. Routledge international handbook of internet gambling. New York (NY): Routledge; p. 161–179.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard C, Williams R, Vokey J. 2015. Gambling fallacies: what are they and how are they best measured. J Addict Res Ther. 06(04):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Linnet J, Frøslev M, Ramsgaard S, Gebauer L, Mouridsen K, Wohlert V. 2012. Impaired probability estimation and decision-making in pathological gambling poker players. J Gambl Stud. 28(1):113–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnet J, Gebauer L, Shaffer H, Mouridsen K, Møller A. 2010. Experienced poker players differ from inexperienced poker players in estimation bias and decision bias. J Gambling Iss. 24:86–100.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Gonzalez H, Estévez A, Griffiths MD. 2019. Internet-based structural characteristics of sports betting and problem gambling severity: is there a relationship? Int J Ment Health Addiction. 17(6):1360–1373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Gonzalez H, Jimenez-Murcia S, Griffiths MD. 2019. Customization and personalization of sports betting products: implications for responsible gambling. Gaming Law Review. 23(8):572–577.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur N. 2018. Gambling commission makes online gambling safer. [Birmingham (UK): Gambling Commission]. [accessed 2020 Jan]. https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news-action-and-statistics/News/gambling-commission-makes-online-gambling-safer
   Google Scholar
• Newall PWS, Thobhani A, Walasek L, Meyer C. 2019. Live-odds gambling advertising and consumer protection. PLoS One. 14(6):e0216876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newall PWS, Walasek L, Vázquez Kiesel R, Ludvig EA, Meyer C. 2019. Betting on intuitive longshots. Retrieved from http://psyarxiv.com/nk6tw
   Google Scholar
• Palan S, Schitter C. 2018. Prolific.ac—a subject pool for online experiments. J Behav Exper Fin. 17:22–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts A. 2004. Against the crowd. Oswestry, Shropshire: Aesculus Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Raylu N, Oei TP. 2004. The gambling related cognitions scale (GRCS): development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties. Addiction. 99(6):757–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roarty N. 2017. William hill #YourOdds betting markets explained - we speak to william hill about their new twitter specials. [accessed 2020 Jan]. https://www.bettingpro.com/category/opinion/william-hill-yourodds-betting-markets-explained-20170123-0009/
   Google Scholar
• Rockloff MJ. 2012. Validation of the consumption screen for problem gambling (CSPG). J Gambl Stud. 28(2):207–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockloff MJ, Browne M, Russell AM, Hing N, Greer N. 2019. Sports betting incentives encourage gamblers to select the long odds: an experimental investigation using monetary rewards. J Behav Addict. 8(2):268–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell AM, Hing N, Browne M. 2019. Risk factors for gambling problems specifically associated with sports betting. J Gambl Stud. 35(4):1211–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell AM, Hing N, Browne M, Li E, Vitartas P. 2019. Who bets on micro events (microbets) in sports? J Gambl Stud. 35(1):205–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell AM, Hing N, Li E, Vitartas P. 2019. Gambling risk groups are not all the same: risk factors amongst sports bettors. J Gambl Stud. 35(1):225–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stata Corp. 2019. Fractional outcome regression. [accessed 2020 Jan]. https://www.stata.com/stata14/fractional-outcome-models/
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Court of the United States. 2017. Murphy vs. national collegiate athletic association. [accessed 2020 Jan]. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-476_dbfi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Schalkwyk MCI, Cassidy R, McKee M, Petticrew M. 2019. Gambling control: in support of a public health response to gambling. Lancet. 393(10182):1680–1681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardle H, Reith G, Langham E, Rogers RD. 2019. Gambling and public health: we need policy action to prevent harm. BMJ. 2019:365.
   Google Scholar