May I have your attention, please? Methodological and analytical flexibility in the addiction stroop

References

• Adams S, Ataya AF, Attwood AS, Munafò MR. 2012. Effects of acute alcohol consumption on alcohol-related cognitive biases in light and heavy drinkers are task-dependent. J Psychopharmacol. 26(2):245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley V, Honzel N, Larsen J, Justus T, Swick D. 2013. Attentional bias for trauma-related words: exaggerated emotional Stroop effect in Afghanistan and Iraq war veterans with PTSD. BMC Psychiatry. 13(1):86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asmaro D, Carolan PL, Liotti M. 2014. Electrophysiological evidence of early attentional bias to drug-related pictures in chronic cannabis users. Addict Behav. 39(1):114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ataya AF, Adams S, Mullings E, Cooper RM, Attwood AS, Munafò MR. 2012. Internal reliability of measures of substance-related cognitive bias. Drug Alcohol Depend. 121(1–2):148–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auchter A, Cormack LK, Niv Y, Gonzalez-Lima F, Monfils MH. 2017. Reconsolidation-extinction interactions in fear memory attenuation: the role of inter-trial interval variability. Front Behav Neurosci. 11:2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baugh F. 2002. Correcting effect sizes for score reliability: a reminder that measurement and substantive issues are linked inextricably. Educ Psychol Meas. 62(2):254–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balk EM, Earley A, Patel K, Trikalinos TA, Dahabreh IJ. 2012. Empirical Assessment of Within-Arm Correlation Imputation in Trials of Continuous Outcomes [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); Nov. Report No.: 12(13)-EHC141-EF.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt MJ, IJzerman H, Dijksterhuis A, Farach FJ, Geller J, Giner-Sorolla R, Grange JA, Perugini M, Spies JR, van 't Veer A. 2014. The replication recipe: what makes for a convincing replication? J Exp Soc Psychol. 50:217–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cane J, Sharma D, Albery I. 2009. The addiction Stroop task: examining the fast and slow effects of smoking and marijuana-related cues. J Psychopharmacol. 23(5):510–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carp J. 2012a. On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of fMRI experiments. Front Neurosci. 6:149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carp J. 2012b. The secret lives of experiments: methods reporting in the fMRI literature. Neuroimage. 63(1):289–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavalarias D, Wallach JD, Li AHT, Ioannidis JPA. 2016. Evolution of reporting p values in the biomedical literature, 1990–2015. JAMA. 315(11):1141–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen P, Schoenmakers TM, Field M. 2015. Less than meets the eye: reappraising the clinical relevance of attentional bias in addiction. Addict Behav. 44:43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper SR, Gonthier C, Barch DM, Braver TS. 2017. The role of psychometrics in individual differences research in cognition: a case study of the AX-CPT. Front Psychol. 8:1482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copersino ML, Serper MR, Vadhan N, Goldberg BR, Richarme D, Chou JC, Stitzer M, Cancro R. 2004. Cocaine craving and attentional bias in cocaine-dependent schizophrenic patients. Psychiatry Res. 128(3):209–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousijn J, van Benthem P, van der Schee E, Spijkerman R. 2015. Motivational and control mechanisms underlying adolescent cannabis use disorders: a prospective study. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 16:36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox WM, Brown MA, Rowlands LJ. 2003. The effects of alcohol cue exposure on non-dependent drinkers' attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli. Alcohol Alcohol. 38(1):45–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox WM, Fadardi JS, Pothos EM. 2006. The addiction-stroop test: theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychol Bull. 132(3):443–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall C, Sherman J. 2016. On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress. J Exp Soc Psychol. 66:93–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristea IA, Kok RN, Cuijpers P. 2016. The effectiveness of cognitive bias modification interventions for substance addictions: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 11(9):e0162226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadardi JS, Cox WM. 2009. Reversing the sequence: reducing alcohol consumption by overcoming alcohol attentional bias. Drug Alcohol Depend. 101(3):137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field M, Cox W. 2008. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend. 97(1–2):1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field M, Werthmann J, Franken I, Hofmann W, Hogarth L, Roefs A. 2016. The role of attentional bias in obesity and addiction. Health Psychol. 35(8):767–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field M, Christiansen P, Cole J, Goudie A. 2007. Delay discounting and the alcohol Stroop in heavy drinking adolescents. Addiction. 102(4):579–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field M, Duka T, Tyler E, Schoenmakers T. 2009. Attentional bias modification in tobacco smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 11(7):812–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field M, Eastwood B. 2005. Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 183(3):350–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field M, Marhe R, Franken IHA. 2014. The clinical relevance of attentional bias in substance use disorders. CNS Spectr. 19(3):225–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field M, Mogg K, Mann B, Bennett GA, Bradley BP. 2013. Attentional biases in abstinent alcoholics and their association with craving. Psychol Addict Behav. 27(1):71–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field M, Munafò MR, Franken IHA. 2009. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse. Psychol Bull. 135(4):589–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franken IHA, Hendriks VM, Stam CJ, Van den Brink W. 2004. A role for dopamine in the processing of drug cues in heroin dependent patients. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 14(6):503–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridrici C, Leichsenring-Driessen C, Driessen M, Wingenfeld K, Kremer G, Beblo T. 2013. The individualized alcohol Stroop task: no attentional bias toward personalized stimuli in alcohol-dependents. Psychol Addict Behav. 27(1):62–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall G, Rodríguez G. 2017. Habituation and conditioning: salience change in associative learning. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 43(1):48–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hedge C, Powell G, Sumner P. 2018. The reliability paradox: why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behav Res Methods. 50(3):1166–1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitmann J, Bennik EC, van Hemel-Ruiter ME, de Jong PJ. 2018. The effectiveness of attentional bias modification for substance use disorder symptoms in adults: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 7(1):160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. 2003. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.). 327(7414):557–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JPA. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2(8):e124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones A, Christiansen P, Field M. 2018. Failed attempts to improve the reliability of the alcohol visual probe task following empirical recommendations. Psychol Addict Behav. 32(8):922–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerst WF, Waters AJ. 2014. Attentional retraining administered in the field reduces smokers' attentional bias and craving. Health Psychol. 33(10):1232–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusher J, Chandler C, Ball D. 2004. Alcohol dependence and the alcohol Stroop paradigm: evidence and issues. Drug Alcohol Depend. 75(3):225–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod C, Mathews A, Tata P. 1986. Attentional bias in emotional disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 95(1):15–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marissen MAE, Franken IHA, Waters AJ, Blanken P, van den Brink W, Hendriks VM. 2006. Attentional bias predicts heroin relapse following treatment. Addiction. 101(9):1306–1312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourik RV, Oosterlaan J, Sergeant JA. 2005. The Stroop revisited: a meta-analysis of interference control in AD/HD. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 46(2):150–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DVM, Button KS, Chambers CD, Percie Du Sert N, Simonsohn U, Wagenmakers E-J, Ware JJ, Ioannidis JPA. 2017. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 1(1):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons S, Kruijt A-W, Fox E. 2019. Psychological science needs a standard practice of reporting the reliability of cognitive-behavioral measurements. Adv Meth Pract Psychol Sci. 2(4):378–395.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliff R. 1993. Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychol Bull. 114(3):510–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins SJ, Ehrman RN. 2016. The role of attentional bias in substance abuse. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 3(4):243–260.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson E, Bevelander KE, Field M, Jones A. 2018. Methodological and reporting quality in laboratory studies of human eating behavior. Appetite. 125:486–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson CD, Pickworth WB, Heishman SJ, Wetter DW, Cinciripini PM, Li Y, Rowell B, Waters AJ. 2015. Black cigarette smokers report more attention to smoking cues than white smokers: implications for smoking cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 17(8):1022–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohatgi A. 2015. Web based tool to extract data from plots, images, and maps. https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer/.
   Google Scholar
• Spanakis P, Jones A, Field M, Christiansen P. 2019. A Stroop in the hand is worth two on the laptop: superior reliability of a smartphone based alcohol Stroop in the real world. Subst Use Misuse. 54(4):692–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro KL, Raymond JE, Arnell KM. 1997. The attentional blink. Trends Cogn Sci. 1(8):291–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberzahn R, Uhlmann EL, Martin DP, Anselmi P, Aust F, Awtrey E, Bahník Š, Bai F, Bannard C, Bonnier E, et al. 2018. Many analysts, one data set: making transparent how variations in analytic choices affect results. Adv Meth Pract Psychol Sci. 1(3):337–356.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U. 2011. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol Sci. 22(11):1359–1366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U, Nelson L, Simmons J. 2014. P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. J Exp Psychol Gen. 143(2):534–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U, Simmons JP, Nelson LD. 2015. Better P-curves: making P-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious P-hacking, a Reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015). J Exp Psychol Gen. 144(6):1146–1152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smaldino PE, McElreath R. 2016. The natural selection of bad science. R Soc Open Sci. 3(9):160384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steegen S, Tuerlinckx F, Gelman A, Vanpaemel W. 2016. Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspect Psychol Sci. 11(5):702–712.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stroop JR. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol. 18(6):643–662.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich R, Miller J. 2015. p-hacking by post hoc selection with multiple opportunities: detectability by skewness test?: Comment on Simonsohn, Nelson, and Simmons (2014). J Exp Psychol Gen. 144(6):1137–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaeghen P, De Meersman L. 1998. Aging and the Stroop effect: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 13(1):120–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters AJ, Carter BL, Robinson JD, Wetter DW, Lam CY, Kerst W, Cinciripini PM. 2009. Attentional bias is associated with incentive-related physiological and subjective measures. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 17(4):247–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters A. j, Feyerabend C. 2000. Determinants and effects of attentional bias in smokers. Psychol Addict Behav. 14(2):111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicherts JM, Veldkamp CLS, Augusteijn HEM, Bakker M, van Aert RCM, van Assen MALM. 2016. Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: a checklist to avoid p-hacking. Front Psychol. 7:1832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiers RW, Gladwin TE, Hofmann W, Salemink E, Ridderinkhof KR. 2013. Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology: mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clin Psychol Sci. 1(2):192–212.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson KM, Millner AJ, Auerbach RP, Glenn CR, Kearns JC, Kirtley OJ, Najmi S, O'Connor RC, Stewart JG, Cha CB. 2019. Investigating the psychometric properties of the Suicide Stroop Task. Psychol Assess. 31(8):1052–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Li Y, Wang G, Yuan X, Ding W, Shen Z. 2014. Attentional bias toward safety predicts safety behaviors. Accid Anal Prev. 71:144–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Fung DSS, Smith H. 2019. Variations in the visual probe paradigms for attention bias modification for substance use disorders. IJERPH. 16(18):3389.
   Google Scholar