Turning points toward drug addiction recovery: contextualizing underlying dynamics of change

References

• Addison M, Kaner E, Spencer L, McGovern W, McGovern R, Gilvarry E, O’Donnell A. 2021. Exploring pathways into and out of amphetamine type stimulant use at critical turning points: a qualitative interview study. Health Sociol Rev. 30(2):111–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adriansen HK. 2012. Timeline interviews: a tool for conducting life history research. Qual Res. 3(1):40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony WA. 1993. Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 16(4):11–538.
   Google Scholar
• Ashford RD, Brown A, Brown T, Callis J, Cleveland HH, Eisenhart E, Groover H, Hayes N, Johnston T, Kimball T, et al. 2019. Defining and operationalizing the phenomena of recovery: a working definition from the recovery science research collaborative. Addict Res Theory. 27(3):179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assink MH, Schroots JJ. 2010. The dynamics of autobiographical memory: using the LIM| Life-line Interview Method. Göttingen: Hogrefe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beckwith M, Best D, Savic M, Haslam C, Bathish R, Dingle G, Mackenzie J, Staiger PK, Lubman DI. 2019. Social Identity Mapping in Addiction Recovery (SIM-AR): extension and application of a visual method. Addict Res Theory. 27(6):462–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellaert L, Martinelli TF, Vanderplasschen W, Best D, van de Mheen D, Vander Laenen F. 2021. Chasing a pot of gold: an analysis of emerging recovery-oriented addiction policies in Flanders (Belgium) and the Netherlands. Drugs: Educ Prev Policy. 28(5):399–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berends L. 2011. Embracing the visual: using timelines with in-depth interviews on substance use and treatment. Qual Rep. 16(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Beckwith M, Haslam C, Haslam SA, Jetten J, Mawson E, Lubman DI. 2016. Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: the Social Identity Model of Recovery (SIMOR). Addict Res Theory. 24(2):111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Irving J, Albertson K. 2017. Recovery and desistance: what the emerging recovery movement in the alcohol and drug area can learn from models of desistance from offending. Addict Res Theory. 25(1):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Ivers J-H. 2021. Inkspots and ice cream cones: a model of recovery contagion and growth. Addict Res Theory. 2021:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Sondhi A, Brown L, Nisic M, Nagelhout GE, Martinelli T, van de Mheen D, Vanderplasschen W. 2021. The Strengths And Barriers Recovery Scale (SABRS): relationships matter in building strengths and overcoming barriers. Front Psychol. 12:663447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Vanderplasschen W, Van de Mheen D, De Maeyer J, Colman C, Vander Laenen F, Irving J, Andersson C, Edwards M, Bellaert L. 2018. REC-PATH (Recovery Pathways): overview of a four-country study of pathways to recovery from problematic drug use. Alcoholism Treatment Quart. 36(4):517–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel 2007. What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. J Subst Abuse Treat. 33(3):221–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. 2016. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res. 26(13):1802–1811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjornestad J, Svendsen TS, Slyngstad TE, Erga AH, McKay JR, Nesvåg S, Skaalevik AW, Veseth M, Moltu C. 2019. “A Life More Ordinary” processes of 5-year recovery from substance abuse. Experiences of 30 recovered service users. Front Psychiatry. 10:689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boshears P, Boeri M, Harbry L. 2011. Addiction and sociality: perspectives from methamphetamine users in suburban USA. Addict Res Theory. 19(4):289–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braslow JT. 2013. The manufacture of recovery. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 9:781–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield S, Fitzgerald L, Selvey L, Maher L. 2019. Turning points, identity, and social capital: a meta-ethnography of methamphetamine recovery. Int J Drug Policy. 67:79–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappeliez P, Beaupré M, Robitaille A. 2008. Characteristics and impact of life turning points for older adults. Ageing Int. 32(1):54–64.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson C. 2012. Using ‘turning points’ to understand processes of change in offending: notes from a Swedish study on life courses and crime. Br J Criminol. 52(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen A-S, Elmeland K. 2015. Former heavy drinkers' multiple narratives of recovery. Nord Stud Alcohol Drugs. 32(3):245–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colman C, Vander Laenen F. 2012. Recovery came first”: desistance versus recovery in the criminal careers of drug-using offenders. Sci World J. 2012:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Colman C, Vander Laenen F. 2017. The desistance process of offenders who misuse drugs. In: Hart EL, van Ginneken E, editors. New perspectives on desistance. Theoretical and empirical developments. London: Palgrave Macmillan; p. 61–84.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan PW, Larson JE, Rüsch N. 2009. Self-stigma and the “why try” effect: impact on life goals and evidence-based practices. World Psychiatry. 8(2):75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damon W, Callon C, Wiebe L, Small W, Kerr T, McNeil R. 2017. Community-based participatory research in a heavily researched inner city neighbourhood: perspectives of people who use drugs on their experiences as peer researchers. Soc Sci Med. 176:85–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson L, White W. 2007. The concept of recovery as an organizing principle for integrating mental health and addiction services. J Behav Health Serv Res. 34(2):109–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruysscher C, Tomlinson P, Vanheule S, Vandevelde S. 2019. Questioning the professionalization of recovery: a collaborative exploration of a recovery process. Disabil Soc. 34(5):797–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekkers A, De Ruysscher C, Vanderplasschen W. 2020. Perspectives on addiction recovery: focus groups with individuals in recovery and family members. Addict Res Theory. 28(6):526–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gueta K. 2017. A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators in treating drug use among Israeli mothers: an intersectional perspective. Soc Sci Med. 187:155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gueta K, Addad M. 2013. Moulding an emancipatory discourse: How mothers recovering from addiction build their own discourse. Addict Res Theory. 21(1):33–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimdahl Vepsä K. 2020. Parents’ experiences of substance use problems, parenthood, and recovery within the 12-step movement. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs. 37(6):576–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hser Y-I, Anglin MD. 2010. Addiction treatment and recovery careers. In: Kelly JF, White WL, Editors. Addiction recovery management: Theory, research and practice. New York: Springer; p. 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hser Y-I, Evans E, Grella C, Ling W, Anglin D. 2015. Long-term course of opioid addiction. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 23(2):76–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hser Y-I, Longshore D, Anglin MD. 2007. The life course perspective on drug use: a conceptual framework for understanding drug use trajectories. Eval Rev. 31(6):515–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt MG, Resnick SG. 2015. Two birds, one stone: unintended consequences and a potential solution for problems with recovery in mental health. Psychiatr Serv. 66(11):1235–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison ED. 2005. The life course perspective: a promising approach for bridging the micro and macro worlds for social workers. Fam Soc. 86(1):143–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison ED. 2019. An update on the relevance of the life course perspective for social work. Fam Soc. 100(4):351–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessup MA, Ross TB, Jones AL, Satre DD, Weisner CM, Chi FW, Mertens JR. 2014. Significant life events and their impact on alcohol and drug use: a qualitative study. J Psychoactive Drugs. 46(5):450–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly JF, Bergman B, Hoeppner BB, Vilsaint C, White WL. 2017. Prevalence and pathways of recovery from drug and alcohol problems in the United States population: implications for practice, research, and policy. Drug Alcohol Depend. 181:162–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly JF, Greene MC, Bergman BG. 2018. Beyond abstinence: changes in indices of quality of life with time in recovery in a nationally representative sample of US adults. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 42(4):770–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirouac M, Frohe T, Witkiewitz K. 2015. Toward the operationalization and examination of “hitting bottom” for problematic alcohol use: a literature review. Alcohol Treat Quart. 33(3):312–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kougiali ZG, Fasulo A, Needs A, Van Laar D. 2017. Planting the seeds of change: directionality in the narrative construction of recovery from addiction. Psychol Health. 32(6):639–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laub JH, Sampson RJ. 1993. Turning points in the life course: why change matters to the study of crime. Criminology. 31(3):301–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudet AB, White W. 2010. What are your priorities right now? Identifying service needs across recovery stages to inform service development. J Subst Abuse Treat. 38(1):51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Slade M. 2011. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 199(6):445–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebregts N, van der Pol P, de Graaf R, van Laar M, van den Brink W, Korf DJ. 2015. Persistence and desistance in heavy cannabis use: the role of identity, agency, and life events. J Youth Stud. 18(5):617–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little M, Handley E, Leuthe E, Chassin L. 2009. The impact of parenthood on alcohol consumption trajectories: variations as a function of timing of parenthood, familial alcoholism, and gender. Dev Psychopathol. 21(2):661–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinelli TF, Nagelhout GE, Bellaert L, Best D, Vanderplasschen W, van de Mheen D. 2020. Comparing three stages of addiction recovery: long-term recovery and its relation to housing problems, crime, occupation situation, and substance use. Drugs: Educ Prevent Policy. 27(5):387–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinelli TF, van de Mheen D, Best D, Vanderplasschen W, Nagelhout GE. 2021. Are members of mutual aid groups better equipped for addiction recovery?: European cross-sectional study into recovery capital, social networks and commitment to sobriety. Drugs: Educ Prevent Policy. 28(5):389–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulewaeter F, De Pauw SS, Vanderplasschen W. 2019. Mothering, substance use disorders and intergenerational trauma transmission: an attachment-based perspective. Front Psychiatry. 10:728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale J, Tompkins C, Wheeler C, Finch E, Marsden J, Mitcheson L, Rose D, Wykes T, Strang J. 2015. You’re all going to hate the word ‘recovery’ by the end of this”: service users’ views of measuring addiction recovery. Drugs: Educ Prevent Policy. 22(1):26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersen H, Landheim A, Skeie I, Biong S, Brodahl M, Benson V, Davidson L. 2018. Why do those with long-term substance use disorders stop abusing substances? A qualitative study. Subst Abuse. 12:1178221817752678–8.117822181775267. 8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price-Robertson R, Obradovic A, Morgan B. 2017. Relational recovery: beyond individualism in the recovery approach. Adv Mental Health. 15(2):108–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe P. 2011. Motherhood, pregnancy, and the negotiation of identity: the moral career of drug treatment. Soc Sci Med. 72(6):984–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes BE, Gottfredson NC, Hill LM. 2018. Desistance and treatment seeking among women with substance use disorders. Qual Health Res. 28(8):1330–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo J, Beresford P. 2015. Between exclusion and colonisation: seeking a place for mad people’s knowledge in academia. Disabil Soc. 30(1):153–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinkel M. 2019. Rethinking turning points: trajectories of parenthood and desistance. J Dev Life Course Criminology. 5(3):366–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroots JJ, Assink MH. 2005. Portraits of life: patterns of events over the lifespan. J Adult Dev. 12(4):183–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheedy CK, Whitter M. 2013. Guiding principles and elements of recovery-oriented systems of care: what do we know from the research? J Drug Addict Educ Erad. 9(4):225–286.
   Google Scholar
• Shinebourne P, Smith JA. 2011. It is just habitual’: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of long-term recovery from addiction. Int J Ment Health Addict. 9(3):282–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair DL, Sussman S, Savahl S, Florence M, Adams S, Vanderplasschen W. 2021. Substitute addictions in persons with substance use disorders: a scoping review. Subst Use Misuse. 56(5):683–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JA. 2004. Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 1(1):39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snoek A, Levy N, Kennett J. 2016. Strong-willed but not successful: the importance of strategies in recovery from addiction. Addict Behav Rep. 4:102–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stuart SR, Tansey L, Quayle E. 2017. What we talk about when we talk about recovery: a systematic review and best-fit framework synthesis of qualitative literature. J Ment Health. 26(3):291–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teruya C, Hser Y-I. 2010. Turning points in the life course: current findings and future directions in drug use research. Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 3(3):189–195.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Impe M. 2021. Stigma through the eyes of people who use(d) illegal drugs: challenging boundaries through Participatory Action Research. Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University.
   Google Scholar
• Van Steenberghe T, Vanderplasschen W, Bellaert L, De Maeyer J. 2021. Photovoicing interconnected sources of recovery capital of women with a drug use history. Drugs: Educ Prevent Policy. 28(5):411–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veseth M, Moltu C, Svendsen TS, Nesvåg S, Slyngstad TE, Skaalevik AW, Bjornestad J. 2019. A stabilizing and destabilizing social world: close relationships and recovery processes in SUD. J Psychosoc Rehabil Ment Health. 6(1):93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Welle-Strand GK, Skurtveit S, Abel KF, Chalabianloo F, Sarfi M. 2020. Living a normal life? Follow-up study of women who had been in opioid maintenance treatment during pregnancy. J Subst Abuse Treat. 113:108004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White WL. 2007. Addiction recovery: its definition and conceptual boundaries. J Subst Abuse Treat. 33(3):229–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White WL, Boyle M, Loveland D. 2002. Alcoholism/addiction as a chronic disease: from rhetoric to clinical reality. Alcohol Treat Quart. 20(3–4):107–129.
   Google Scholar