Toward the nature of automatic associations: item-level computational semantic similarity and IAT-based alcohol-valence associations

References

• Ashley V, Honzel N, Larsen J, Justus T, Swick D. 2013. Attentional bias for trauma-related words: exaggerated emotional Stroop effect in Afghanistan and Iraq war veterans with PTSD. BMC Psychiatry. 13:86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh JA. 1994. The four horsemen of automaticity: awareness, intention, efficiency and control in social cognition. In: Wyer R, Srull T, editors. Handbook of social cognition. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum. p. 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bayliss AP, Tipper SP, Wakeley J, Cowen PJ, Rogers RD. 2017. Vulnerability to depression is associated with a failure to acquire implicit social appraisals. Cognition Emotion. 31(4):825–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer JS, Stallen M, Lombardo M, Gonsalkorale K, Cunningham WA, Sherman J. 2008. The Quadruple Process model approach to examining the neural underpinnings of prejudice. Neuroimage. 43(4):775–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanton H, Jaccard J, Klick J, Mellers B, Mitchell G, Tetlock PE. 2009. Strong claims and weak evidence: reassessing the predictive validity of the IAT. J Appl Psychol. 94(3):567–582. discussion 583–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliskan A, Bryson JJ, Narayanan A. 2017. Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science. 356(6334):183–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cane JE, Sharma D, Albery IP. 2009. The addiction Stroop task: examining the fast and slow effects of smoking and marijuana-related cues. J Psychopharmacol. 23(5):510–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen P, Mansfield R, Duckworth J, Field M, Jones A. 2015. Internal reliability of the alcohol-related visual probe task is increased by utilising personalised stimuli and eye-tracking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 155:170–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrey FR, Sherman JW, Gawronski B, Hugenberg K, Groom CJ. 2005. Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: the quad model of implicit task performance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 89(4):469–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutuli D. 2014. Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression strategies role in the emotion regulation: an overview on their modulatory effects and neural correlates. Front Syst Neurosci. 8:175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Houwer J, Teige-Mocigemba S, Spruyt A, Moors A. 2009a. Implicit measures: a normative analysis and review. Psychol Bull. 135(3):347–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer J, Teige-Mocigemba S, Spruyt A, Moors A. 2009b. Theoretical claims necessitate basic research: reply to Gawronski, Lebel, Peters, and Banse (2009) and Nosek and Greenwald (2009). Psychol Bull. 135(3):377–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch R, Strack F. 2006. TARGET ARTICLE: duality models in social psychology: from dual processes to interacting systems. Psychological Inquiry. 17(3):166–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson JM, Gately C, Field M. 2013. Alcohol dependent patients have weak negative rather than strong positive implicit alcohol associations. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 228(4):603–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczack S, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. 2013. Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best? Dev Cogn Neurosci. 4:38–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings C, Englert J, Wentura D, Bermeitinger C. 2010. Decomposing the emotional Stroop effect. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 63(1):42–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin TE, den Uyl TE, Wiers RW. 2012. Anodal tDCS of dorsolateral prefontal cortex during an Implicit Association Test. Neurosci Lett. 517(2):82–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin TE, Rinck M, Eberl C, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J, Wiers RW. 2015. Mediation of Cognitive Bias Modification for alcohol addiction via stimulus-specific alcohol avoidance association. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 39(1):101–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin TE, Salemink E, Garritsen H, Noom S, Kraaij G, Wiers RW. 2018. Is alcohol-related aggression related to automatic alcohol–power or alcohol–aggression associations? Psychol Violence. 8(2):229–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin TE, Vink M. 2018. Alcohol-related attentional bias variability and conflicting automatic associations. J Exp Psychopathol. 9(2):204380871877963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin TE, Wiers CE, Wiers RW. 2016. Cognitive neuroscience of cognitive retraining for addiction medicine: from mediating mechanisms to questions of efficacy. Prog Brain Res. 224:323–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin TE, Wiers RW. 2012. Alcohol-related effects on automaticity due to experimentally manipulated conditioning. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 36(5):895–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JL. 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Personality Soc Psychol. 74(6):1464–1480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajcak G, Nieuwenhuis S. 2006. Reappraisal modulates the electrocortical response to unpleasant pictures. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 6(4):291–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao Y, Huang X, Dong M, Xu B. 2020. A biologically plausible supervised learning method for spiking neural networks using the symmetric STDP rule. Neural Netw. 121:387–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedge C, Powell G, Sumner P. 2018. The reliability paradox: why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behav Res. 50(3):1166–1186.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert C, Kissler J. 2010. Motivational priming and processing interrupt: startle reflex modulation during shallow and deep processing of emotional words. Int J Psychophysiol. 76(2):64–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben K, Nosek BA, Wiers RW. 2010. Seeing the forest through the trees: a comparison of different IAT variants measuring implicit alcohol associations. Drug Alcohol Depend. 106(2-3):204–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben K, Rothermund K, Wiers RW. 2009. Predicting alcohol use with a recoding-free variant of the Implicit Association Test. Addict Behav. 34(5):487–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jocham G, Klein TA, Ullsperger M. 2011. Dopamine-mediated reinforcement learning signals in the striatum and ventromedial prefrontal cortex underlie value-based choices. J Neurosci. 31(5):1606–1613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynott D, Kansal H, Connell L, O’Brien K. 2012. Modelling the IAT: implicit Association Test Reflects Shallow Linguistic Environment and not Deep Personal Attitudes. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5fj441tg
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod CM. 2012. Cognitive bias modification procedures in the management of mental disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 25(2):114–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure SM, Bickel WK. 2014. A dual-systems perspective on addiction: contributions from neuroimaging and cognitive training. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1327(1):62–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. ArXiv:1301.3781 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781
   Google Scholar
• Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J. 2013. Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality. ArXiv:1310.4546 [Cs, Stat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.4546.
   Google Scholar
• Min H, Peng Y, Shoss M, Yang B. 2021. Using machine learning to investigate the public’s emotional responses to work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Appl Psychol. 106(2):214–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostafin BD, Palfai TP. 2006. Compelled to consume: the implicit association test and automatic alcohol motivation. Psychol Addict Behav. 20(3):322–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palfai TP, Ostafin BD. 2003. Alcohol-related motivational tendencies in hazardous drinkers: assessing implicit response tendencies using the modified-IAT. Behav Res Ther. 41(10):1149–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Řehůřek R, Sojka P. 2010. Software Framework for Topic Modelling with Large Corpora. Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks; LREC 2010, Valletta, Malta. p. 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Rinck M, Wiers RW, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. 2018. Relapse prevention in abstinent alcoholics by cognitive bias modification: clinical effects of combining approach bias modification and attention bias modification. J Consult Clin Psychol. 86(12):1005–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson TE, Berridge KC. 1993. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 18(3):247–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider W, Shiffrin RM. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychol Rev. 84(1):1–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacy AW, Wiers RW. 2010. Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 6:551–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford MS, Vasterling JJ, Mathias CW, Constans JI, Houston RJ. 2001. Impact of threat relevance on P3 event-related potentials in combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychiatry Res. 102(2):125–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri RE, Schultz W. 1999. A neural network model with dopamine-like reinforcement signal that learns a spatial delayed response task. Neuroscience. 91(3):871–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW. 2010. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J Lang Soc Psychol. 29(1):24–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. 2011. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci. 22(4):490–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiers RW, van Woerden N, Smulders FTY, de Jong PJ. 2002. Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 111(4):648–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield C, Connell L. 2019. Understanding the role of linguistic distributional knowledge in cognition. PsyArXiv.
   Google Scholar
• Yin Z, Sulieman LM, Malin BA. 2019. A systematic literature review of machine learning in online personal health data. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 26(6):561–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar