Social model recovery and recovery housing

References

• Alcoholics Anonymous. 1939. Alcoholics Anonymous: the story of how many thousands of men and women have recovered from alcoholism (1st ed.). New York: The Works Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ashford RD, Brown A, Brown T, Callis J, Cleveland HH, Eisenhart E, Groover H, Hayes N, Johnston T, Kimball T, et al. 2019. Defining and operationalizing the phenomena of recovery: a working definition from the recovery science research collaborative. Addict Res Theory. 27(3):179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry CL, McGinty EE, Pescosolido BA, Goldman HH. 2014. Stigma, discrimination, treatment effectiveness, and policy: public views about drug addiction and mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 65(10):1269–1272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkman TJ. 1998. Is recovery planning any different from treatment planning? J Subst Abuse Treat. 15(1):37–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkman TJ, Kaskutas LA, Owen P. 2007. Contrasting and converging philosophies of three models of alcohol/other drugs treatment: Minnesota model, social model, and addiction therapeutic communities. Alcohol Treat Quart. 25(3):21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Borkman TJ, Kaskutas LA, Room J, Bryan K, Barrows D. 1998. An historical and developmental analysis of social model programs. J Subst Abuse Treat. 15(1):7–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braveman P, Egerter S, Williams DR. 2011. The social determinants of health: coming of age. Annu Rev Public Health. 32:381–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano I, Best D, Edwards M, Lehman J. 2017. Recovery capital pathways: modelling the components of recovery wellbeing. Drug Alcohol Depend. 181:11–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloud W, Granfield R. 2008. Conceptualizing recovery capital: expansion of a theoretical construct. Subst Use Misuse. 43(12–13):1971–1986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd MH. 1997. Social model of recovery: origin, early features, changes and future. J Psychoact Drugs. 29(2):133–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. 1990. Broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jack HE, Oller D, Kelly J, Magidson JF, Wakeman SE. 2018. Addressing substance use disorder in primary care: the role, integration, and impact of recovery coaches. Subst Abus. 39(3):307–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jason LA, Roberts K, Olson BD. 2005. Attitudes toward recovery homes and residents: does proximity make a difference. J Community Psychol. 33(5):529–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jason LA, Wiedbusch E, Bobak TJ, Taullahu D. 2020. Estimating the number of substance use disorder recovery homes in the United States. Alcohol Treat Q. 38(4):506–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaskutas LA, Ammon L, Weisner C. 2003. A naturalistic analysis comparing outcomes at substance abuse treatment programs with differing philosophies: social and clinical model perspectives. Int J Self Help Self Care. 2(2):111–133.
   Google Scholar
• Kaskutas LA, Greenfield TK, Borkman TJ, Room JA. 1998. Measuring treatment philosophy: a scale for substance abuse recovery programs. J Subst Abuse Treat. 15(1):27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaskutas LA, Keller JW, Witbrodt J. 1999. Measuring social model in California: how much has changed? Contemp Drug Prob. 26(4):607–631.
   Google Scholar
• Kaskutas LA, Witbrodt J, French MT. 2004. Outcomes and costs of day hospital treatment and nonmedical day treatment for chemical dependency. J Stud Alcohol. 65(3):371–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaskutas LA, Zavala SK, Parthasarathy S, Witbrodt J. 2008. Costs of day hospital and community residential chemical dependency treatment. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 11(1):27–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudet AB, Humphreys K. 2013. Promoting recovery in an evolving context: what do we know and what do we need to know about recovery support services? J Subst Abuse Treat. 45(1):126–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd C. 2013. The stigmatization of problem drug users: a narrative literature review. Prevent Policy. 20(2):85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney E, Witbrodt J, Mericle AA, Polcin DL. 2021. Resident and house manager perceptions of social environments in sober living houses: associations with length of stay. J Community Psychol. 49(7):2959–2971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O’Brien CP, Kleber HD. 2000. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA. 284(13):1689–1695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan AT, Woodworth AM. 2014. The affordable care act and treatment for ‘substance use disorders’: implications of ending segregated behavioral healthcare. J Subst Abuse Treat. 46(5):541–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mericle AA, Miles J, Cacciola J, Howell J. 2014. Adherence to the social model approach in Philadelphia recovery homes. Int J Self Help Self Care. 8(2):259–275.
   Google Scholar
• Mericle AA, Patterson D, Howell J, Subbaraman MS, Faxio A, Karriker-Jaffe KJ. 2022. Identifying the availability of recovery housing in the U.S.: the NSTARR Project. Drug Alcohol Depend. 230:109188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mericle AA, Polcin DL, Hemberg J, Miles J. 2017. Recovery housing: evolving models to address Resident Needs. J Psychoact Drugs. 49(4):352–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles J, Mericle A, Ritter G, Reif S. 2022. Association of facility characteristics and substance use disorder outcomes at discharge from residential treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 136:108664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran GS, Russinova Z, Gidugu V, Gagne C. 2013. Challenges experienced by paid peer providers in mental health recovery: a qualitative study. Community Ment Health J. 49(3):281–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Alliance for Recovery Residences. 2015, October 7. Recovery residence quality standards. [accessed 2021 Jun 15]. https://narronline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/National-Recovery-Residence-Quality-Standards-Oct-7-2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Alliance for Recovery Residences. 2018. NARR Standard 3.0: introduction (pp. 12).
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Recovery Residences. 2011. Standard for Recovery Residences: Version 1.0 [accessed 2016 May 27]. Archived by WebCite® at (pp. 6). Atlanta, GA.. http://www.webcitation.org/6hp89Pkyl.
   Google Scholar
• Noorani T, Karlsson M, Borkman T. 2019. Deep experiential knowledge: reflections from mutual aid groups for evidence-based practice. Evid Policy. 15(2):217–234.
   Google Scholar
• O’Briant RG, Lennard HL. 1973. Recovery from Alcoholism: a social treatment model. Springfield, IL: charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Korcha R, Bond J, Galloway G. 2010a. Eighteen-month outcomes for clients receiving combined outpatient treatment and sober living houses. J Subst Use. 15(5):352–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Korcha RA, Bond J, Galloway G. 2010b. Sober living houses for alcohol and drug dependence: 18-month outcomes. J Subst Abuse Treat. 38(4):356–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Korcha R, Witbrodt J, Mericle AA, Mahoney E. 2018. Motivational Interviewing Case Management (MICM) for persons on probation or parole entering sober living houses. Crim Justice Behav. 45(11):1634–1659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Henderson DM, Korcha R, Evans K, Wittman F, Trocki K. 2012a. Perceptions of sober living houses among addiction counselors and mental health therapists: knowledge, views and perceived barriers. J Psychoactive Drugs. 44(3):224–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Henderson D, Trocki K, Evans K, Wittman F. 2012b. Community context of sober living houses. Addict Res Theory. 20(6):480–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Mahoney E, Mericle AA. 2021. Psychometric properties of the recovery home environment scale. Subst Use Misuse. 56(8):1161–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Mahoney E, Witbrodt J, Mericle AA. 2020. Recovery home environment characteristics associated with recovery capital. J Drug Issues. 51(2):253–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Mericle A, Howell J, Sheridan D, Christensen J. 2014. Maximizing social model principles in residential recovery settings. J Psychoactive Drugs. 46(5):436–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif S, George P, Braude L, Dougherty RH, Daniels AS, Ghose SS, Delphin-Rittmon ME. 2014. Recovery housing: assessing the evidence. Psychiatr Serv. 65(3), 295–300.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman F. 1965. The ‘helper therapy’ principle. Social Work. 10(2):27–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw S, Borkman T. 1990. Social model alcohol recovery: an environmental approach. Burbank, CA: bridge-Focus, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sheedy CK, Whitter M. 2009. Guiding principles and elements of recovery-oriented systems of care: What do we know from the research? HHS Publication No. (SMA) 09-4439. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2011. SAMHSA announces a working definition of "recovery" from mental disorders and substance use disorders [accessed 2013Jul 09]. Archived by WebCite® http://www.webcitation.org/6HzPegfFN. http://www.samhsa.gov/newsroom/advisories/1112223420.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2019. Recovery housing: best practices and suggested guidelines. (p. 10). Rockville, MD: substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/housing-best-practices-100819.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2021. National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS): 2020; Data on substance abuse treatment facilities.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, & Office of the Surgeon General. 2016. Facing addiction in America: the Surgeon General’s report on alcohol, drugs, and health [accessed 2017 Mar 07]. Archived by WebCite® at Washington, DC. http://www.webcitation.org/6onCCszJk.
   Google Scholar
• White WL. 2008. Recovery management and recovery-oriented systems of care: scientific rationale and promising practices. Pittsburgh, PA: Northeast Addiction Technology Transfer Center, the Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center, and the Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health/Mental Retardation Services.
   Google Scholar
• Witbrodt J, Bond J, Kaskutas LA, Weisner C, Jaeger G, Pating D, Moore C. 2007. Day hospital and residential addiction treatment: randomized and nonrandomized managed care clients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 75(6):947–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittman FD, Jee B, Polcin DL, Henderson D. 2014. The setting is the service: how the architecture of the sober living residence supports community based recovery. Int J Self Help Self Care. 8(2):189–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wittman FD, Polcin DL. 2014. The evolution of peer run sober housing as a recovery resource for California communities. Int J Self Help Self Care. 8(2):157–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright A. 1990. What is a social model? In Shaw S, Borkman T, editors. Social model alcohol recovery: an environmental approach (p. 7–10). Burbank, CA: bridge-Focus, Inc.
   Google Scholar