How can public authorities support co-production of mountain bike trails?

References

• Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsen, J., Kristensen, M.S. & Iversen, E.B. (in press), Why build mountain bike trails? An exploratory mixed-methods study of volunteer motives in Danish MTB-trail building. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. S. (2014). Quality of data analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 496–509). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1119–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services. Taylor & Francis. p. 322.
   Google Scholar
• Chaney, R. A., Hall, P., Crowder, A. R., Crookston, B. T., & West, J. H. (2019). Mountain biker attitudes and perceptions of eMTBs (electric-mountain bikes). Sport Sciences for Health, 15(3), 577–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-019-00555-z
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, L., & Kriwoken, L. (2003). Managing recreational mountain biking in Wellington Park, Tasmania, Australia. Annals of Leisure Research, 6(4), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2003.10600931
   Google Scholar
• DNA. (2021). News on the homepage of the Danish Nature Agency. https://naturstyrelsen.dk/nyheder/2021/januar/dobbelt-saa-mange-er-hoppet-paa-mountainbiken-under-corona-krisen/ Accessed on 230623
   Google Scholar
• Eng.naturstyrelsen.dk. (2022). Homepage of the Danish Nature Agency. Accessed on 211222.
   Google Scholar
• Evju, M., Hagen, D., Jokerud, M., Olsen, S. L., Selvaag, S. K., & Vistad, O. I. (2021). Effects of mountain biking versus hiking on trails under different environmental conditions. Journal of Environmental Management, 278, 111554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fledderus, J., Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. E. (2015). User co-production of public service delivery: An uncertainty approach. Public Policy and Administration, 30(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715572362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D., & Holloway, L. (2018). From experience economy to experience landscape: The example of UK trail centres. Area, 50(50), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12366
   Google Scholar
• Ibsen, B. (2021). Voluntary and public sector collaboration in Scandinavia: New approaches to co-production. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, E. B., & Ibsen, B. (2018). Civilsamfundet som’motor’ i facilitetsudvikling. Center for forskning i idræt, sundhed og civilsamfund. Syddansk Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Kamei, T., Aikoh, T., & Ryan, R. L. (2016). Motivations of trail volunteers of the adirondack mountain club. In Proceedings of the fábos conference on landscape and greenway planning: Vol. 5: No. 2, article 37.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiner, A., Freuler, B. W., Arnberger, A., & Hunziker, M. (2022). Biking-hiking conflicts and their mitigation in urban recreation areas: Results of a quasi-experimental long-term evaluation in the Zurich forest. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 40: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Koemle, D. B., & Morawetz, U. B. (2016). Improving mountain bike trails in Austria: An assessment of trail preferences and benefits from trail features using choice experiments. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 15, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2016.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Lang, G., Piller, S., Schmid, J., Lamprecht, M., & Nagel, S. (2022). Professionalization and organizational problems of sports clubs: Is there a relationship? Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS), 7, 004. https://doi.org/10.36950/2022ciss004
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. B., Kays, R., & Leung, Y. F. (2020). Wildlife response to recreational trail building: An experimental method and Appalachian case study. Journal for Nature Conservation, 56, 125815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsome, D., Stender, K., Annear, R., & Smith, A. (2016). Park management response to mountain bike trail demand in south western Australia. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 15, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2016.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Nord-Larsen, T., Johannsen, V. K., Riis-Nielsen, T., Thomsen, I. M., Bentsen, N. S., & Jørgensen, B. B. (2023). Skovstatistik 2021.
   Google Scholar
• OIA. (2022). Outdoor participation trends report. Outdoor Industry Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, C. M., & Rossi, S. (2016). Mountain biking in peri-urban parks: Social factors influencing perceptions of conflicts in three popular national parks in Australia. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 15, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2016.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Ralston, R., & Rhoden, S. (2005). The motivations and expectations of volunteers on cycle trails: The case of the national cycle network, UK. Tourism, Hospitality Planning & Development, 2(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790530500171732
   Google Scholar
• Rask, S., & Eske, M. (2021). Danskernes motions-og sportsvaner 2020. Danish Institute for Sports Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 170–183). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sicilia, M., Sancino, A., Nabatchi, T., & Guarini, E. (2019). Facilitating co-production in public services: Management implications from a systematic literature review. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, T., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). The dark side of co-creation and co-production: Seven evils . In Co-production and co-creation, Taco Brandsen, Bram Verschuere, Trui Steen (eds.) (pp. 284–293). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stougaard, M. S. (2021). Co-producing public welfare services with vulnerable citizens: A case study of a Danish-Somali women’s association co-producing crime prevention with the local authorities. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(6), 1389–1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00235-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2010). ‘Extending the Dream Machine': Understanding Dedicated Participation in Mountain Biking (Doctoral dissertation, University of Otago).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Sand, M. (2021). Doubles, drops and ditches: Deconstructing the art of the mountain bike trail-builder. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 33, 100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2020.100364
   Google Scholar
• Tuurnas, S. (2021). Skilling and motivating staff for co-production. In The Palgrave handbook of co-production of public services and outcomes, Elke Loeffler, Tony Bovaird (pp. 491–506). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkes-Allemann, J., Ludvig, A., Gobs, S., Lieberherr, E., Hogl, K., & Selter, A. (2022). Getting a grip on negotiation processes: Addressing trade-offs in mountain biking in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Forest Policy and Economics, 136, 102683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkes-Allemann, J., Ludvig, A., & Hogl, K. (2020). Innovation development in forest ecosystem services: A comparative mountain bike trail study from Austria and Switzerland. Forest Policy and Economics, 115, 102158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wipf, E., Ohl, F., & Groeneveld, M. (2009). Managing natural locations for outdoor recreation: The role of consultative procedures and the sense of justice. Public Management Review, 11(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030902989599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, I. D., Brown, G., & Wohlfart, T. (2018). Applying public participation GIS (PPGIS) to inform and manage visitor conflict along multi-use trails. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(3), 470–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1360315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, I. D., Wohlfart, T., Brown, G., & Bartolomé Lasa, A. (2015). The use of public participation GIS (PPGIS) for park visitor management: A case study of mountain biking. Tourism Management, 51, 112–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajc, P., & Berzelak, N. (2016). Riding styles and characteristics of rides among Slovenian mountain bikers and management challenges. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 15, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2016.04.009
   Google Scholar