IFRS adoption and financial statement readability: Korean evidence

References

• Adelberg, A. H. 1979. “A Methodology for Measuring the Understandability of Financial Report Messages.” Journal of Accounting Research 17 (2): 565–592.10.2307/2490519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelberg, A. H. 1980. “Financial Reports Can Be Made More Understandable.” Journal of Accountancy 10 (1): 10–20.
   Google Scholar
• Adelberg, A. H. 1983. “The Accounting Syntactic Complexity Formula: A New Instrument for Predicting the Readability of Selected Accounting Communications.” Accounting and Business Research 13 (51): 163–175.10.1080/00014788.1983.9729749
   Google Scholar
• Adelberg, A. H., and J. R. Razek. 1984. “The Cloze Procedure: A Methodology for Determining the Understandability of Accounting Textbooks.” The Accounting Review 59 (1): 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M. 1992. In Other Words. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203327579
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M., ed. 1998. Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, A., and K. Leoffler. 1979. “Readability of Accounting and Auditing Messages.” Journal of Business Communication 16 (3): 49–59.10.1177/002194367901600305
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. T. 1991. Translation and Translating: Theory and Practice. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Botosan, C. A. 1997. “Disclosure Level and the Cost of Equity Capital.” Accounting Review 72 (3): 323–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choka, A. D. 1966. “Wanted: Annual Reports Can Read.” Management Review 55 (7): 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, C. W. 1982. “The Demand for External Auditing: Size, Debt and Ownership Influences.” The Accounting Review 57 (2): 272–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtis, J. K. 1986. “An Investigation into Annual Report Readability and Corporate Risk-return Relationships.” Accounting and Business Research 16 (64): 285–294.10.1080/00014788.1986.9729329
   Google Scholar
• Courtis, J. K. 1998. “Annual Report Readability Variability: Tests of the Obfuscation Hypothesis.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 11 (4): 459–472.10.1108/09513579810231457
   Google Scholar
• DuPree, J. M. 1985. “Users’ Preferences for Descriptive V. Technical Accounting Terms.” Accounting and Business Research 15 (60): 281–290.10.1080/00014788.1985.9729279
   Google Scholar
• Ewer, S. R. 1997. “Transparency and Understandability but for Whom?” The CPA Journal. http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2007/207/infocus/p16.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board. 1980. Statement of Concepts No.2: Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information. CT: FASB.
   Google Scholar
• Flesch, R. 1948. “A New Readability Yardstick.” Journal of Applied Psychology 32 (3): 221–233.10.1037/h0057532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenspan, J. W., and C. L. Hartwell. 2009. “Are FASB Statements Becoming More Understandable?” The CPA Journal 79 (2): 34.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. 1976. “The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Self Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5 (4): 475–492.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360.10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. J. 1988. “A Longitudinal Study of the Readability of the Chairman's Narratives in the Corporate Reports of a UK Company.” Accounting and Business Research 18 (72): 297–305.10.1080/00014788.1988.9729377
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. J. 1994. “Readability of Accounting Narratives.” Management Accounting: Magazine for Chartered Management Accountants 72 (4): 28–29.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. J., and M. A. Clatworthy. 2006. “Differential Patterns of Textual Characteristics and Company Performance in the Chairman’s Statement.” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability 19 (4): 493–511.
   Google Scholar
• Lehavy, R., F. Li, and K. Merkley. 2011. “The Effect of Annual Report Readability on Analyst following and the Properties of Their Earnings Forecasts.” The Accounting Review 86 (3): 1087–1115.10.2308/accr.00000043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, N. R., L. D. Parker, G. D. Pound, and P. Sutcliffe. 1986. “Accounting Report Readability: The Use of Readability Techniques.” Accounting and Business Research 16 (63): 199–213.10.1080/00014788.1986.9729318
   Google Scholar
• Morton, J. R. 1974. “Qualitative Objectives of Financial Accounting: A Comment on Relevance and Understandability.” Journal of Accounting Research 12 (2): 288–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubert, A., and G. M. Shreve. 1992. Translation as Text. Kent, OH: The Kent State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newmark, P. 1988. Approaches to Translation. New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nida, E. A. 1964. Toward a Science of Translating: With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Boston, MA: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Nida, E. A., and C. R. Taber. 1982. The Theory and Practice of Translation. Boston, MA: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Regazzi, J. H. 1974. “Why Aren’t Financial Statements Understood?” The Journal of Accountancy, April 48–55.
   Google Scholar
• Rennekamp, K. 2012. “Processing Fluency and Investors’ Reactions to Disclosure Readability.” Journal of Accounting Research 50 (5): 1319–1354.10.1111/joar.2012.50.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, N. and C. Gibson. 1990. “Readability of Management’s Discussion and Analysis.” Accounting Horizons 4 (4): 78–88.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, R., R. G. Insley, and R. D. Blackwell. 1993. “Performance and Readability: A Comparison of Annual Reports of Profitable and Unprofitable Corporations.” Journal of Business Communication 30 (1): 49–61.10.1177/002194369303000103
   Google Scholar