Validation of a single-item stem for collective efficacy measurement in sports teams

References

• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, A. G., & Roszkowski, M. J. (1995). The long and short of it. Marketing Research, 7(1), 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230–258. doi: 10.1177/0049124192021002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. M., Mellalieu, S. D., & Shearer, D. A. (2014). Observation interventions as a means to manipulate collective efficacy in groups. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36, 27–39. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2013-0058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. M., Mellalieu, S. D., Shearer, D., Roderique-Davies, G., & Hall, R. (2013). Performance accomplishment information as predictors of self-efficacy as a function of skill level in amateur golf. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25(2), 197–208. doi: 10.1080/10413200.2012.705802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grezes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243–1249. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grezes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor similarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16, 1905–1910. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M. C., Mazziotta, J. C., & Lenzi, G. L. (2003). Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 5497–5502. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0935845100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sports teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266. doi: 10.1123/jsp.7.3.244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, V. T., Hwang, S. S., & Feuerman, M. (2000). Validation of the Edmonton symptom assessment scale. Cancer, 88, 2164–2171. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000501)88:9<2164::AID-CNCR24>3.0.CO;2-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, G. M., & Feltz, D. L. (2008). Exploring new directions in collective efficacy and sport. In M. Beauchamp & M. Eys (Eds.), Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology: Contemporary themes (pp. 221–248). New York, NY: Routledge Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and influence in regression. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dimoka, A. (2011). Brain mapping of psychological processes with psychometric scales: An fMRI method for social neuroscience. NeuroImage, 54, S263–S271. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Sandercock, P., & Frost, C. (2004). Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: Does questionnaire length matter? Controlled Clinical Trials, 25(1), 31–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feltz, D. L., & Lirgg, C. D. (1998). Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 557–564. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., Dunham, R. B., & Pierce, J. L. (1998). Single-item versus multiple-item measurement scales: An empirical comparison. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(6), 898–915. doi: 10.1177/0013164498058006003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 138–152. doi: 10.2307/257089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlees, I. A., Graydon, J. K., & Maynard, I. W. (1999). The impact of collective efficacy beliefs on effort and persistence in a group task. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17(2), 151–158. doi: 10.1080/026404199366253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlees, I. A., Graydon, J. K., & Maynard, I. W. (2000). The impact of individual efficacy beliefs on group goal selection and group goal commitment. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18, 451–459. doi: 10.1080/02640410050074386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819–832. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R. (2005). What can functional neuroimaging tell the experimental psychologist? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58, 193–233. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuze, J.-P., Sarrazin, P., Masiero, M., Raimbault, N., & Thomas, J.-P. (2006). The relationships of perceived motivational climate to cohesion and collective efficacy in elite female teams. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18, 201–218. doi: 10.1080/10413200600830273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeppner, B. B., Kelly, J. F., Urbanoski, K. A., & Slaymaker, V. (2011). Comparative utility of a single-item versus multiple-item measure of self-efficacy in predicting relapse among young adults. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 41(3), 305–312. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan, P. M., DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2003). Wording effects in self-esteem scales: Methodological artifact or response style? Structural Equational Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10, 435–455. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, J. S., & Turner, B. A. (2008). The feasibility of single-item measures for organizational justice. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 12, 237–257. doi: 10.1080/10913670802349790
   Google Scholar
• Kozub, S. A., & McDonnell, J. F. (2000). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and collective efficacy in rugby teams. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23, 120–129.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, H., & Trail, G. (2005). The feasibility of single-item measures in sport loyalty research. Sport Management Review, 8, 69–88. doi: 10.1016/S1441-3523(05)70033-4
   Google Scholar
• Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20, 645–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo, R. (2002). A caveat on using single-item versus multiple-item scales. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 68–75. doi: 10.1108/02683940210415933
   Google Scholar
• Marsh-Richard, D. M., Hatzis, E. S., Mathias, C. W., Venditti, N., & Dougherty, D. M. (2009). Adaptive visual analog scales (AVAS): A modifiable software program for the creation, administration, and scoring of visual analog scales. Behavioral Research Methods, 41, 99–106. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.1.99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. C., Meier, E., Muehlenkamp, J., & Weatherly, J. N. (2009). Testing the construct validity of Dixon & Johnson's (2007) gambling functional assessment. Behavior Modification, 33, 156–174. doi: 10.1177/0145445508320927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L., & Short, S. E. (2004). Collective efficacy and team performance: A longitudinal study of collegiate football teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 126–138. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.8.2.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, M. S. (2002). Using a single-item approach to measure facet job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 77–86. doi: 10.1348/096317902167658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rameson, L. T., Morelli, S. A., & Lieberman, M. D. (2011). The neural correlates of empathy: Experience, automaticity, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 235–245. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161. doi: 10.1177/0146167201272002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, D. (2008). Question stem. In P. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods (pp. 666–667). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781412963947.n429
   Google Scholar
• Shearer, D. A., Holmes, P., & Mellalieu, S. D. (2009). Collective efficacy in sport: The future from a social neuroscience perspective. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2, 38–53. doi: 10.1080/17509840802695816
   Google Scholar
• Short, S. E., Apostal, K., Harris, C., Poltavski, D., Young, J., Zostautas, N., … Feltz, D. L. (2002). Assessing collective efficacy: A comparison of two approaches. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, S115–S116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, S. E., & Ross-Stewart, L. (2009). A review of self-efficacy based interventions. In S. D. Mellalieu & S. Hanton (Eds.), Applied sport psychology advances: A review (pp. 221–281). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Short, S. E., Sullivan, P., & Feltz, D. L. (2005). Development and preliminary validation of the collective efficacy questionnaire for sports. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 9, 181–202. doi: 10.1207/s15327841mpee0903_3
   Google Scholar
• Spink, K. S. (1990). Group cohesion and collective efficacy of volleyball teams. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 12(3), 301–311. doi: 10.1123/jsep.12.3.301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stajkovic, A. D., Lee, D. S., & Nyberg, A. J. (2009). Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 814–828. doi: 10.1037/a0015659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thom, N. J., Johnson, D. C., Flagan, T., Simmons, A. N., Kotturi, S. A., Van Orden, K. F., … Paulus, M. P. (2012). Detecting emotion in others: Increased insula and decreased medial prefrontal cortex activation during emotion processing in elite adventure racers. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 225–231. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitton, S. M., & Fletcher, R. B. (2014). The group environment questionnaire: A multilevel confirmatory factor analysis. Small Group Research, 45, 68–88. doi: 10.1177/1046496413511121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462–468. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, V. S., Morlock, R. J., & Feltner, D. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of a visual analog scale for the assessment of anxiety. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 1–8. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar