Enhanced expectancies in golf putting – a replication study with increased ecological validity

References

• Badami, R., VaezMousavi, M., Wulf, G., & Namazizadeh, M. (2012). Feedback about more accurate versus less accurate trials: Differential effects on self-confidence and activation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83, 196–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, M. W., & Middleton, N. (2018). PUTTING – A direction-distance problem. In M. Toms (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of golf science (pp. 151–160). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chauvel, G., Wulf, G., & Maquestiaux, F. (2015). Visual illusions can facilitate sport skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 717–721. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0744-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2007). Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 40–47. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2007.10599402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davids, K. (1988). Ecological validity in understanding sport performance: Some problems of definition. Quest, 40, 126–136. doi: 10.1080/00336297.1988.10483894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2011). Links between attention, performance pressure, and movement in skilled motor action. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 301–306. doi: 10.1177/0963721411416572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., Butler, M. S., & Fischman, M. G. (1995). On the problem of two-dimensional error scores: Measures and analyses of accuracy, bias, and consistency. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 241–250. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1995.9941714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I. (1997). Response expectancy theory and application: A decennial review. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 6, 69–79. doi: 10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80012-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., & Lynn, S. J. (1999). Automaticity in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 54, 504–515. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., & Carnahan, H. (1990). Bandwidth knowledge of results and motor learning: More than just a relative frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 777–789. doi: 10.1080/14640749008401249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, R., & Maxwell, J. (2008). The theory of reinvestment. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 160–183. doi: 10.1080/17509840802287218
   Google Scholar
• Michael, R. B., Garry, M., & Kirsch, I. (2012). Suggestion, cognition, and behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 151–156. doi: 10.1177/0963721412446369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, N. T., & Hodges, N. J. (2018). Balancing our perceptions of the efficacy of success-based feedback manipulations on motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 50, 614–630. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2017.1383227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, N. T., Lohse, K. R., & Hodges, N. J. (2015). Manipulating target size influences perceptions of success when learning a dart-throwing skill but does not impact retention. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, K., Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2016). Enhanced expectancies facilitate golf putting. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 229–232. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascua, L. A., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2015). Additive benefits of external focus and enhanced performance expectancy for motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33, 58–66. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.922693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelz, D. (2000). Dave Pelz's putting Bible. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• PGA Tour. (2018, May 23). Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.pgatour.com/stats.html
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C. J., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2018). Motor control and learning – a behavioral emphasis (6th ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. J., Taylor, S. J., & Withers, K. (1997). Applying bandwidth feedback scheduling to a golf shot. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 215–221. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1997.10608000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoate, I., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Enhanced expectancies improve movement efficiency in runners. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30, 815–823. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.671533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trempe, M., Sabourin, M., & Proteau, L. (2012). Success modulates consolidation of a visuomotor adaptation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 52–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, J. N. (2016). Origins and current issues in Quiet Eye research. Current Issues in Sport Science, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. R., & Pearcy, R. C. (2009). Visuomotor control of straight and breaking golf putts. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 109, 555–562. doi: 10.2466/pms.109.2.555-562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, J. K., Linkenauger, S. A., & Proffitt, D. R. (2012). Get me out of this slump! visual illusions improve sports performance. Psychological Science, 23, 397–399. doi: 10.1177/0956797611428810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G. (2013). Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 77–104. doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2012.723728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1382–1414. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1996). Self-regulated learning of a motoric skill: The role of goal setting and self-monitoring. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 8, 60–75. doi: 10.1080/10413209608406308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziv, G., Ochayon, M., & Lidor, R. (2019). Enhanced or diminished expectancies in golf putting – which actually affects performance? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 40, 82–86. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar