A wolf in (black) sheep’s clothing? Subjective group dynamics in sports fans

References

• Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro–norm and anti–norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 906–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams, D., Rutland, A., & Cameron, L. (2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: Children’s judgments of normative and deviant in-group and out-group individuals. Child Development, 74(6), 1840–1856. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00641.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams, D., Rutland, A., Cameron, L., & Ferrell, J. (2007). Older but wilier: In-group accountability and the development of subjective group dynamics. Developmental Psychology, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.134
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, M., Veldkamp, C. L., van den Akker, O. R., van Assen, M. A., Crompvoets, E., Ong, H. H., & Wicherts, J. M. (2020). Recommendations in pre-registrations and internal review board proposals promote formal power analyses but do not increase sample size. PLoS One, 15(7), e0236079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., & Billings, L. S. (1999). Black sheep and expectation violation: Integrating two models of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(4), 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199906)29:4<523::AID-EJSP944>3.0.CO;2-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1991). The positive social and self concept consequences of sports team identification. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 15(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/019372359101500202
   Google Scholar
• Branscombe, N. R., Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G., & Coleman, J. (1993). In-group or out-group extemity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(4), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293194003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brydges, C. R. (2019). Effect size guidelines, sample size calculations, and statistical power in gerontology. Innovation in Aging, 3(4), igz036. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, B. D., & Donavan, T. D. (2013). Human brands in sport: Athlete brand personality and identification. Journal of Sport Management, 27(3), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.27.3.193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., Bourguignon, D., & Seron, E. (2002). Who may enter? The impact of in-group identification on in-group/out-group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., Paladino, M. P., & Sacchi, S. (2002). I belong, therefore, I exist: Ingroup identification, ingroup entitativity, and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202282001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotterill, S. T., & Symes, R. (2014). Integrating social media and new technologies into your practice as a sport psychology consultant. Sport & Exercise Psychology Review, 10(1), 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, P., & Westergren, H. (1999). Gender identity: Affected by social change? Journal of Personality Assessment, 73(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA730102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalakas, V., Madrigal, R., & Anderson, K. L. (2004). We are number one!’ The phenomenon of basking–in–reflected–glory and its implications for sports marketing. In L. R. Kahle, & C. Riley (Eds.), Sports marketing and the psychology of marketing communication (pp. 67–79). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dalakas, V., & Melancon, J. P. (2012). Fan identification, Schadenfreude toward hated rivals, and the mediating effects of importance of winning index (IWIN). Journal of Services Marketing, 26(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041211199724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A., & Bremner, G. (2006). The experimental method in psychology. In G. M. Breakwell, S. Hammond, C. Fife-Schaw, & J. A. Smith (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (3rd ed, pp. 64–87). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz-Uhler, B., End, C., Demakakos, N., Dickirson, A., & Grantz, A. (2002). Fans’ reactions to law–breaking athletes. International Sports Journal, 6(1), 160–170.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherston, A. (2012). A look at the Duke-Kentucky series. Duke Athletics. https://goduke.com/news/2012/11/13/205731187.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ferrin, D. L., Kim, P. H., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2007). Silence speaks volumes: The effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity-and competence-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiese, B. H. (1992). Dimensions of family rituals across two generations: Relation to adolescent identity. Family Process, 31(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1992.00151.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, J. S., Parker, H. M., Brett, M., & Higgins, J. (2009). Off–field behaviour of athletes and team identification: Using social identity theory and balance theory to explain fan reactions. Journal of Sport Management, 23(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.23.2.142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., & Wakefield, K. (1998). Factors leading to group identification: A field study of winners and losers. Psychology & Marketing, 15(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199801)15:1<23::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000004
   Google Scholar
• Hagger, M. S., Anderson, M., Kyriakaki, M., & Darkings, S. (2007). Aspects of identity and their influence on intentional behaviour: Comparing effects for three health behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(2), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression–based approach. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hirshon, N. (2020). Social identity theory in sports fandom research. In R. A. Dunn (Ed.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on media fandom (pp. 172–191). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self–categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, M. (2006). Sport psychology: A student's handbook. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & McAuliffe, B. J. (2002). ‘We’re all individuals’: Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence-versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2008). Benefits of membership: The activation and amplification of group identities in response to social rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(9), 1200–1213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208320062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, D. H., & Pradhan, S. (2020). If you ain’t first, you’re last!” Understanding identity threat, team identification, and advertisement messages when your favorite team loses. Journal of Sport Management, 35(2), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2019-0445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPherson, E., & Kerr, G. (2021). Sport fans’ perspectives of public shaming of professional athletes on social media. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(1), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2020.1836505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Martinez–Taboada, C. (1998b). The role of categorization and in–group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 976–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., & Paez, D. (1994). The ‘black sheep effect’: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779543000011
   Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., Paez, D., & Abrams, D. (1998a). Social identity and intragroup differentiation as subjective social control. In S. Worchel, & J. F. Morales (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 124–141). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter– and intra–group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. P. (1988). The “black sheep effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka, H., Chelladurai, P., & Harada, M. (2003). Direct and interaction effects of team identification and satisfaction on intention to attend games. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12(4), 244–253.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. P., & Moores, E. (2007). The development of a short scale measuring aggressiveness and anger in competitive athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meggs, J., & Ahmed, W. (2021). Applying cognitive analytic theory to understand the abuse of athletes on Twitter. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2021.2004210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newport, K. (2016, December). Colts attempt to take in St. Louis fans looking for new team as Rams move to LA. Bleacher Report. bleacherreport.com/articles/2607570–colts–strike–to–take–in–st–louis–fans–looking–for–new–team–as–rams–move–to–la
   Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. (2017). pirateplot. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/yarrr/vignettes/pirateplot.html
   Google Scholar
• Plante, C. N., Reysen, S., Chadborn, D., Roberts, S. E., & Gerbasi, K. C. (2020). ‘Get out of my fandom, newbie’: A cross-fandom study of elitism and gatekeeping in fans. The Journal of Fandom Studies, 8(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs_00013_1
   Google Scholar
• Rees, T., Haslam, S. A., Coffee, P., & Lavallee, D. (2015). A social identity approach to sport psychology: Principles, practice, and prospects. Sports Medicine, 45(8), 1083–1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0345-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruser, J. B., & Steinfeldt, J. A. (eds.). (2021). It's a contact sport: The psychological impact of social media in sport. In The Routledge handbook of clinical sport psychology (pp. 153–164). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, J. (2018). Thinking twice before you post: Issues student-athletes face on social media. New Directions for Student Services, 163(163), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20272
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, J., & Truax, C. (2014). “I hate you man!”: Exploring maladaptive parasocial interaction expressions to college athletes via twitter. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 7(1), 333–351.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2001). The good, the bad, and the manly: Threats to one’s prototypicality and evaluations of fellow in–group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(6), 510–517. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, T. W., & Otten, S. (2002). Overlap of self, ingroup, and outgroup: Pictorial measures of self–categorization. Self and Identity, 1(4), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/152988602760328012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selker, R. (2017). medmod: Mediation and moderation in jamovi and R [jamovi module].
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information/Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 13(2), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks–Cole.
   Google Scholar
• The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi. (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org
   Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., & Loy, L. S. (2017). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner, & L. Zoonen (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1–13). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1993). Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Influence of identification with a sports team on objective knowledge and subjective beliefs. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26(4), 551–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wann, D. L., & Dolan, T. J. (1994). Influence of spectators’ identification on evaluation of the past, present, and future performance of a sports team. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(2), 547–552. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.78.2.547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wann, D. L., & Grieve, F. G. (2005). Biased evaluations of in-group and out-group spectator behaviour at sporting events: The importance of team identification and threats to social identity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(5), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.5.531-546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wann, D. L., Koch, K., Knoth, T., Fox, D., Aljubaily, H., & Lantz, C. D. (2006). The impact of team identification on biased predications of player performance. The Psychological Record, 56(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youmans, W. L., & York, J. C. (2012). Social media and the activist toolkit: User agreements, corporate interests, and the information infrastructure of modern social movements. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar