TOPSIS Method and Similarity Measures Based on Cosine Function Using Picture Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and its Applications to Strategic Decision Making

References

• Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 1965;8:338–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1986;20(1):87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanassov KT. More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1989;33(1):37–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdanbakhsh O, Dick S. A systematic review of complex fuzzy sets and logic. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 2018;338:1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asiain MJ, et al. Negations with respect to admissible orders in the interval-valued fuzzy set theory. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2018;26(2):556–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan N, Ullah K, Mahmood T, et al. Some root level modifications in interval valued fuzzy graphs and their generalizations including neutrosophic graphs. Mathematics. 2019;7(1):72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar K, Garg H. Connection number of set pair analysis based TOPSIS method on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to decision making. Applied Intelligence. 2018;48(8):2112–2119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg H, Kumar K. Some aggregation operators for linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set and its application to group decision-making process using the set pair analysis. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2018;43(6):3213–3227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood T, et al. Several hybrid aggregation operators for triangular intuitionistic fuzzy set and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Granular Computing. 2018;3(2):153–168.
   Google Scholar
• Kim T, Sotirova E, Shannon A, et al. Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy evaluations for analysis of a student’s knowledge in university e-learning courses. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems. 2018;18(3):190–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuong BC. Picture fuzzy sets. Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics. 2014;30(4):409–420.
   Google Scholar
• Singh P. Correlation coefficients for picture fuzzy sets. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2015;28(2):591–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg H. Some picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multi-criteria decision-making. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2017;42(12):5275–5290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei G. Picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2017;33(2):713–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei G. Picture fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Fundamental Informatica. 2018;157(3):271–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torra V. Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 2010;25(6):529–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beg I, Rashid T. Group decision making using intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems. 2014;14(3):181–187.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood T, Mahmood F, Khan Q. Some generalized aggregation operators for cubic hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to multi criteria decision making. Journal of Mathematics. 2017: 1016–2526. 49(1), 31-49.
   Google Scholar
• Ullah K, Mahmood T, Jan N, et al. On bipolar-valued hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision making. The Nucleus. 2018;55(2):93–101.
   Google Scholar
• Farhadinia B. Information measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci (Ny). 2013;240:129–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai Y, Xu Z, Liao H. Measures of probabilistic interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets and the application in reducing excessive medical examinations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2017;26(3):1651–1670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood T, Ullah K, Khan Q, et al. Some aggregation operators for bipolar-valued hesitant fuzzy information. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences. 2018;10(4S):240–245.
   Google Scholar
• Deli I. A TOPSIS method by using generalized trapezoidal hesitant fuzzy numbers and application to a robot selection problem. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2020;38(1):779–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akram M, Ali G, Alcantud JCR. New decision-making hybrid model: intuitionistic fuzzy N-soft rough sets. Soft Comput. 2019;23(20):9853–9868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akram M, Ali G. Hybrid models for decision-making based on rough Pythagorean fuzzy bipolar soft information. Granular Computing. 2020;5(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Akram M, Ali G, Waseem N, et al. Decision-making methods based on hybrid mF models. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2018;35(3):3387–3403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Li Y. Picture hesitant fuzzy set and its application to multiple criteria decision-making. Symmetry (Basel). 2018;10(7):295. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10070295.
   Google Scholar
• Hesamian G, Chachi J. On Similarity Measures for fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition, decision making, clustering, and approximate reasoning. Journal of Uncertain Systems. 2017;11(1):35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Lohrmann C, Luukka P, Jablonska-Sabuka M, et al. A combination of fuzzy Similarity Measures and fuzzy entropy measures for supervised feature selection. Expert Syst Appl. 2018;110:216–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhavudh SS, Srinivasan R. Intuitionistic fuzzy graphs of second type. Advances in Fuzzy Mathematics. 2017;12(2):197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang CM, Yang MS, Hung WL. New Similarity Measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the Jaccard index with its application to clustering. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 2018;33(8):1672–1688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Wang X, Quan W, et al. A new approach to construct SM for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Soft Comput. 2019;23(6):1985–1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Olson DL, Qin Z. Similarity Measures between intuitionistic fuzzy (vague) sets: A comparative analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2007;28(2):278–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye J. Similarity Measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on cosine function for the decision making of mechanical design schemes. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2016;30(1):151–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei G. Some Similarity Measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 2018;15(1):77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei G. Some cosine Similarity Measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications to strategic decision making. Informatica. 2017;28(3):547–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thao NX. Similarity Measures of picture fuzzy sets based on entropy and their application in MCDM. Pattern Analysis and Applications. 2019;23(3):1203–1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wang L, Yu X, et al. A new concept of cosine Similarity Measures based on dual hesitant fuzzy sets and its possible applications. Cluster Comput. 2018;22(6):15483–15492.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Li J, Sun Y, et al. Novel distance and Similarity Measures on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in clustering analysis. IEEE Access. 2019;7:100231–100242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah K, Mahmood T, Jan N. Similarity Measures for T-spherical fuzzy sets with applications in pattern recognition. Symmetry (Basel). 2018;10(6):193. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10060193.
   Google Scholar
• Wang P, Wang J, Wei G, et al. Similarity Measures of q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets based on cosine function and their applications. Mathematics. 2019;7(4):340. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7040340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei G, Wei Y. Similarity Measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets based on the cosine function and their applications. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 2018;33(3):634–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei G, Lu J, Wang J, et al. Similarity Measures of spherical fuzzy sets based on cosine function and their applications. IEEE Access. 2019;7:159069–159080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad Z, Mahmood T, Saad M, et al. Similarity Measures for picture hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications in pattern recognition. Journal of Prime Research in Mathematics. 2019;15:81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood T, Ahmad Z, Garg H, et al. Similarity Measures for T-spherical fuzzy sets based on cosine function and their applications. Journal of complex and intelligent systems. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ye J. Improved cosine Similarity Measures of simplified neutrosophic sets for medical diagnoses. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 2015;63(3):171–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Ali Z, Mahmood T. A method to multi-attribute group decision-making problem with Complex q-rung orthopair linguistic information based on Heronian mean operators. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems. 2019;12(2):1465–1496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Mahmood T, Ali Z. Complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications in multi-attribute group decision making. Information. 2020;11(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11010005.
   Google Scholar