Integrated Possibilistic Linear Programming with Beta-Skewness Degree for a Fuzzy Multi-Objective Aggregate Production Planning Problem Under Uncertain Environments

References

• Cha-ume K, Chiadamrong N. Simulation of retail supply chain behaviour and financial impact in an uncertain environment. Int J Logist Syst Manag. 2012;13(2):162.
   Google Scholar
• Oey E, Wijaya WA, Hansopaheluwakan S. Forecasting and aggregate planning application-a case study of a small enterprise in Indonesia. Int. J. Process. Manag. Benchmarking. 2020;10(1):1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Karmarkar U, Rajaram K. Aggregate production planning for process industries under oligopolistic competition. Eur J Oper Res. 2012;223(3):680–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain M M, Nahar K, Reza S, et al. Aggregate production planning under demand uncertainty by considering wastage cost and incentives. World Rev Bus Res. 2016;6(2):170–185.
   Google Scholar
• Baykasoglu A, Gocken T. Multi-objective aggregate production planning with fuzzy parameters. Adv Eng Softw. 2010;41(9):124–1131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entezaminia A, Heydari M, Rahmani D. A multi-objective model for multi-product multi-site aggregate production planning in a green supply chain: considering collection and recycling centers. J Manuf Syst. 2016;40(1):63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bellman R, Zadeh L. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manage Sci. 1970;17(4):141–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Liang T. Applying possibilistic linear programming to aggregate production planning. Int J Prod Econ. 2005;98(3):328–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özgen D, Önüt S, Gülsün B, et al. A two-phase possibilistic linear programming methodology for multi-objective supplier evaluation and order allocation problems. Inf Sci. 2008;178(2):485–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabak Ö, Ülengin F. Possibilistic linear-programming approach for supply chain networking decisions. Eur J Oper Res. 2011;209(3):253–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amid A, Ghodsypour S, O’Brien C. A weighted additive fuzzy multi-objective model for the supplier selection problem under price breaks in a supply chain. Int J Prod Econ. 2009;121(2):323–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachhwani K, Poonia M P. Mathematical solution of multilevel fractional programming problem with fuzzy goal programming approach. J Ind Eng Int. 2012;8(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Turgay S, Taşkın H. Fuzzy goal programming for health-care organization. Comput Ind Eng. 2015;86(1):14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Das SK, Mandal T, Edalatpanah SA. A mathematical model for solving fully fuzzy linear programming problem with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. appl. Intell. 2016;46:509–519.
   Google Scholar
• Barik S K, Biswal M P. Possibilistic linear programming problems involving normal random variables. Int J Fuzzy Syst. 2016;5(3):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Su TS, Ciou SR. A fuzzy multi-objective optimization model for recoverable manufacturing systems in uncertain environments. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 2019;36(1):32–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghizadeh K, Bagherpour M, Mahdavi I. An interactive fuzzy goal programming approach for multi-period multi-product production planning problem. Fuzzy Inf Eng. 2019;3(4):393–410.
   Google Scholar
• Liang T. Application of interactive possibilistic linear programming to aggregate production planning with multiple imprecise objectives. Prod Plan Control. 2007;18(7):548–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vluymans S, Parthaláin N M, Cornelis C, et al. Weight selection strategies for ordered weighted average based fuzzy rough sets. Inf Sci. 2019;501(1):155–171.
   Google Scholar
• Roldán C, Herrera F. On a new methodology for ranking fuzzy numbers and its application to real economic data. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2018;353(1):86–110.
   Google Scholar
• Parra M A, Terol A B, Gladish B P, et al. Solving a multiobjective possibilistic problem through compromise programming. Eur J Oper Res. 2005;164(3):748–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng H, Huang W, Cai J. Solving a fully fuzzy linear programming problem through compromise programming. J Appl Math. 2013;13(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois D, Foulloy L, Mauris G, et al. Probability-possibility transformations, triangular fuzzy sets, and probabilistic inequalities. Reliable Compt. 2004;10(4):273–297.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Ma W, Chen L. New similarity of triangular fuzzy number and its application. Sci World J. 2014;1(1):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann HJ. Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1978;1(1):45–55.
   Google Scholar