The New Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process with Interval Type-2 Trapezoidal Fuzzy Sets and Its Application

References

• Tseng ML, Lin YH, Chiu AS, et al. Fuzzy AHP-approach to TQM strategy evaluation. Ind Eng Manag Syst. 2008;7:34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kahraman C, Ruan D, Dogan I. Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Inform Sci. 2003;157:135–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Chen SJ, Hwang CL, Hwang FP. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Berlin: Springer; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz WA. Fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1983;11:229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang DY. Extent analysis and synthetic decision, optimization techniques and applications. Singapore: World Scientific; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Chang DY. Application of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res. 1996;95:649–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhailov L. A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in analytic hierarchy process. J Oper Res Soc. 2000;51:341–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csutora R, Buckley JJ. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: the Lambda-Max method. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2001;120:181–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley JJ, Eslami E, Feuring T. Fuzzy mathematics in finance and engineering. Berlin: Springer; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Mikhailov L. Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method. Comput Oper Res. 2004;31:293–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JM, Chin KS. An eigenvector method for generalizing normalized interval and fuzzy weights. Appl Math Comput. 2006;181:1257–1275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JM, Chin KS. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: a logarithmic fuzzy preference programming methodology. Int J Approx Reason. 2011;52:541–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZJ. Consistency analysis and priority derivation of triangular fuzzy preference relations based on modal value and geometric mean. Inform Sci. 2015;314:169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prascevic Z, Prascevic N. Application of fuzzy AHP method based on eigenvalues for decision making in construction industry. Tech Gazette. 2016;23:57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Prascevic Z, Prascevic N. Application of fuzzy AHP for ranking and selection of alternatives in construction project management. J Civil Eng Manag. 2017;23:1123–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh LA. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Inform Sci. 1975;8:199–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnik NN, Mendel JM. Operations on type-2 fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2001;122:327–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu DR, Mendel JM. Aggregation using the linguistic weighted average and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2007;15:1145–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman C, Oztaysi B, Sari IC, et al. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowl Based Syst. 2014;59:48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendel JM. An architecture for making judgements using computing with words. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci. 2002;12:325–335.
   Google Scholar
• Ozen T, Garibaldi JM. Effect of type-2 fuzzy membership function shape on modelling variation in human decision making. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems; Budapest, Hungary; 2004. p. 971–976.
   Google Scholar
• Sevastjanov P, Figat P. Aggregation of aggregating modes in MCDM: synthesis of type-2 and level-2 fuzzy sets. Omega. 2007;35:505–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Mendel JM. Uncertainty measures for interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Inform Sci. 2007;177:5378–5393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager RR. Fuzzy subsets of type-2 in decisions. J Cybern. 1980;10:137–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh VN, Nakamori Y, Lawry J. A probability-based approach to comparison of fuzzy numbers and applications to target-oriented decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2008;16:371–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SY, Wang CY. Fuzzy decision making systems based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Inform Sci. 2013;242:1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman C, Oztaysi B, Sari IC, et al. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with type-2 fuzzy sets. In: World Scientific Proceedings Series on Computer Engineering and Information Science Uncertainty Modeling in Knowledge Engineering and Decision Making; 2012. p. 201–206.
   Google Scholar
• Chiao KP. Interval type-2 fuzzy sets extension of analytic hierarchy process with application to new product development project screening. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Theory and its Applications; Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 2014. p. 111–116.
   Google Scholar
• Oztaysi B, Cevik Onar S, Kahraman C. Prioritization of business analytics projects using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP. In: Springer International Conference on European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology; Warsaw, Poland; 2017. p. 106–117.
   Google Scholar
• Pane ES, Wibawa AD, Purnomo MH. Event log-based fraud rating using interval type-2 fuzzy sets in fuzzy AHP. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on TENCON; Singapura, Singapura; 2016. p. 1965–1968.
   Google Scholar
• Ecer F. Multi-criteria decision making for green supplier selection using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study of a home appliance manufacturer. Oper Res Int J. 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-020-00552-y.
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz N, Kahraman C. Evaluation of social sustainable development factors using Buckley's fuzzy AHP based on Z-numbers. In: Springer International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making; Istanbul, Turkey; 2020. p. 770–778.
   Google Scholar
• Riaz M, Hashmi MR. Linear Diophantine fuzzy set and its applications towards multi-attribute decision making problems. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2019;37:5417–5439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik E, Akyuz E. An interval type-2 fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods for decision-making problems in maritime transportation engineering: the case of ship loader. Ocean Eng. 2018;155:371–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonar A, Pehlivan NY. Evaluation of life quality by integrated method of AHP and TOPSIS based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Hacettepe J Math Stat. 2017;46:511–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz H, Kabak O. Prioritizing distribution centers in humanitarian logistics using type-2 fuzzy MCDM approach. J Enterp Inf Manag. 2020;33:1199–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir YS, Uskudar A. Strategy selection by using interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM and an application. J Eng Res. 2020;8:172–189.
   Google Scholar
• Abbasimehr H, Nourani E, Shabani M. A hybrid framework for ranking reviewers based on interval type-2 fuzzy AHP and VIKOR. Int J Intell Eng Inform. 2020;8:95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Mendel JM, John RI, Liu F. Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2006;14:808–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain R. Decision-making in the presence of fuzzy variables. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1976;6:698–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javanmard M, Mishmast Nehi H. Rankings and operations for interval type-2 fuzzy numbers: a review and some new methods. J Appl Math Comput. 2019;59:597–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YJ, Lee HS. The revised method of ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid and original points. Comput Math Appl. 2008;55:2033–2042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niewiadomski A, Ochelska J, Szczepaniak PS. Interval-valued linguistic summaries of databases. Control Cybern. 2006;35:415–443.
   Google Scholar
• Lee LW, Chen SM. Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the extension of TOPSIS method and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetic; Kunming, China; 2008. p. 3260–3265.
   Google Scholar
• Chen SM, Lee LW. Fuzzy multiple attributes group-decision making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Syst Appl. 2010;37:824–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng CH. A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1998;95:307–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar