Political clientelism in Turkish sports federations

References

• Akşam. (2012). Referansı vekil olanların işi oldu! [Those who have a parliamentarian reference They Get the job!]. Retrieved from http://www.aksam.com.tr/guncel/referansi-vekil-olanlarin-isi-oldu--91334h/haber-91334
   Google Scholar
• Aydın, A. D., Demir, H., & Yetim, A. A. (2007). Türk spor politikalarında öngörülen hedeflerin gerçekleşme düzeylerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma [A research to determine the levels of realization of the preaimed objectives within the Turkish Policies of Sports]. N.Ü. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2), 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Bugün. (2012). Cengiz Yağız: Seçimde şaibe, bürokrasinin baskısı ve tehditleri var [Cengiz Yagiz: Stain on elections, there is the pressure and threat of the bureaucracy]. Retrieved from http://spor.bugun.com.tr/son-dakika/cengiz-yagiz-secimde-saibe-burokrasinin-baskisi-ve-tehditleri-var-haberi-80419
   Google Scholar
• Chappelet, J.-L., Bousigue, A., & Cohen, B. (2008). The autonomy of sport in Europe. Strasbourg: EPAS.
   Google Scholar
• CNOSF. (2014). General information. Retrieved from http://franceolympique.com/index.phtml
   Google Scholar
• Cumhuriyet. (2012). İcraat değil teşkilat! [Not the operations but the governance]. Retrieved from http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/?hn=376812
   Google Scholar
• DOSB. (2014). General information. Retrieved from http://www.dosb.de/en/organisation/philosophie/dosb-profile/
   Google Scholar
• Ersel, H. (2013). Politico-economic development of Turkey and the transformation of political Islam. Working Paper 746 in the Economic Research Forum, Gizza.
   Google Scholar
• Erturan, E. E., & Imamoğlu, A. F. (2011). Almanya ve Türkiye'deki spor kulüplerinin karşılaştırmalı analizi: Türkiye'deki spor kulüplerinin yapı ve işleyişine yeni bir yaklaşım [Comparative analysis of Sports Clubs in Germany and Turkey: A new approach to structure and function of the Sport Clubs in Turkey]. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 22(2), 54–68.
   Google Scholar
• Erturan, E. E., & Yenel, F. (2004). Federasyon başkanlarinin spor federasyonlarinin özerkliğine ilişkin görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi [An evaluation for the opinions of Federation Presidents Concerning to Autonomy in Turkish Sport Federations]. Gazi Beden Eğitim ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Erturan, E. E., Yenel, F., & Kocamaz, S. (2013). Spor federasyonlarındaki gönüllülerin katılım nedenleri ve kazanımları: Ciddi boş zaman teorisine göre bir değerlendirme [The reasons for and the benefits of participation of the volunteers in Turkish Sport Federations: An evaluation related to Serious Leisure Theory]. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 4(1), 48–76.
   Google Scholar
• Fisek, K. (1998). Devlet politikası ve toplumsal ilişkileri açısından spor yönetimi [Sports management according to the relations with the governmental policy and the social structure]. Ankara: Bağırgan Yayınevi.
   Google Scholar
• Girginov, V. (2009). Bulgarian sport policy 1945–1989: A strategic relations approach. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 26, 515–538. doi:10.1080/09523360802658184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girginov, V., & Sandanski I. (2008). Understanding the changing nature of sports organisations in transforming societies. Sport Management Review, 11(1), 21–50. doi:10.1016/S1441-3523(08)70102-5
   Google Scholar
• GSB. (2014). General information. Retrieved from https://www.sgm.gov.tr/
   Google Scholar
• GSGM. (1990). Spor Şurası ön komisyon raporları [Reports of Sport Council pre-comissions]. Ankara: Basım Ofset.
   Google Scholar
• GSGM. (1999a). Federasyon başkanları toplantısı [Meeting of Federation Presidents]. Ankara: GSGM Yayını.
   Google Scholar
• GSGM. (1999b). Spor Şurası [Sport Council]. Ankara: GSGM Yayını.
   Google Scholar
• Güneş-Ayata, A. (1994). Roots and trends of clientelism in Turkey. In L. Roniger & A. Güneş-Ayata (Eds.), Democracy clientelism and civil society (pp. 49–63). Boulder, CO and London: Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, I. P., & Nassis, P. (1999). Political clientelism and sports policy in Greece. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 34 (1), 43–58. doi:10.1177/101269099034001004
   Google Scholar
• Heper, M., & Keyman, E. F. (1998). Double-faced state: Political patronage and the consolidation of democracy in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 34, 259–277. doi:10.1080/00263209808701251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurriyet. (1997). Özerklik beklentisi [Autonomy expectation]. Retrieved from http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/ShowNew.aspx?id=-276382
   Google Scholar
• Hurriyet. (1998). Özerkleşmede son adım [Recent steps in autonomy]. Retrieved from http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/ShowNew.aspx?id=-13440
   Google Scholar
• Imamoglu, A. F., & Cimen, Z. (1999). Türkiye'de spor federasyonlarinda örgütsel değişme ihtiyaci ve bazi uygulamalar üzerine düşünceler [Remarks on the need for organizational change in Sport Federations and on some operations in Turkey]. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2), 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Keyman, E. F. (2010). Globalization, modernity and democracy – Turkish foreign policy 2009 and beyond, perceptions. Autumn – Winter 2010, 15(3–4), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kurer, O. (1993). Clientelism, corruption, and the allocation of resources. Public Choice, 77, 9–273 doi:10.1007/BF01047869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousseau, D. Y. (2012). Is Turkey democratizing with EU reforms?: An assessment of human rights, corruption and socio-economic conditions. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 12(1), 63–80. doi:10.1080/14683857.2012.661222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Numerato, D. (2009). The institutionalisation of regional public sport policy in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 1(1), 13–30. doi:10.1080/19406940802681236
   Google Scholar
• Radikal. (2012a). Teniste‘atama’ günü [‘Designation’ day in tennis]. Retrieved from http://www.radikal.com.tr/Radikal.aspx?aType=RadikalDetayV3&ArticleID=1106507&CategoryID=84
   Google Scholar
• Radikal. (2012b). Vekili bul, kadroyu kap [Find the parliamentarian, grab the position]. Retrieved from http://www.radikal.com.tr/spor/vekili_bul_kadroyu_kap-1075122
   Google Scholar
• Roniger, L. (2004). Political clientelism, democracy, and market economy. Comparative Politics, 36(3), 353–375. doi:10.2307/4150135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şahin, M. Y., & Imamoğlu, A. F. (2011). Akademisyenlerin ve milletvekillerinin spor siyaset etkileşimine yönelik görüşleri [Views of parliamentarians and academics on the interaction of politics and sports]. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(2), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sayarı, S. (2011). Clientelism and patronage in Turkish politics and society. In B. Toprak & F. Birtek, (Eds.), The postmodern abyss and the new politics of Islam: Assabiyah revisited essays in honor of Şerif Mardin (pp. 81–94). Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. The American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91–113. doi:10.2307/1959280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soysal, M. (1989). Türkiye Olimpiyat paneli ile sporda devletin yeri panelinde yapilan konuşmalar [Speech text of Turkish Olympics Panel and the Panel of the Role of State in Sport]. Ankara
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank (2014). GDP per capita. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD
   Google Scholar
• Türker, A. (2012, October 25). Seçimin suyu çıktı [Elections are spoilt]. Habertürk Gazetesi. Retrieved from http://www.haberturk.com/yazarlar/atilla-turker/788389-secimin-suyu-cikti
   Google Scholar