Challenging the new orthodoxy: a critique of SPLISS and variable-oriented approaches to comparing sporting nations

References

• Andersen, S., & Roglan, L. (2012). Elite sport: Same ambitions, different tracks. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Andreff, W. (1997). Sports financing in Europe - Towards a transformation in the 21st century. In ( Vol. News Articles Section, Play the Game Website). Copenhagen: Play the Game.
   Google Scholar
• Andreff, W., with Bourg, J. F., Halba, B., & Nys, J. F. (1995). Les enjeux economiques du sport en Europe: financement et impact economique [ The economic challenges of sport in Europe: Finance and economic impact]. Paris: Editions Dalloz.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T., & Norrie, A. (eds.). (1998). Critical realism: Essential readings. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsgard, N. A., Houlihan, B. M. J., Mangset, P., Nødland, S. I., & Rommetveldt, H. (2007). Sport policy: A comparative analysis of stability and change. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Chalip, L., Johnson, A., & Stachura, L. (eds.). (1996). National sports policies: An international handbook. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooksy, L. J., Gill, P., & Kelly, P. A. (2001). The program logic model as an integrative framework for a multimethod evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24(2), 119–128. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7189(01)00003-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V. (2007). Sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. Brussels: VUB Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V. (2018). A mixed methods approach to compare elite sport policies of nations. A critical reflection on the use of composite indicators in the SPLISS study. Sport and Society, 21(2), 331–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., Bingham, J., Shibli, S., Van Bottenburg, M., & De Knop, P. (2008a). The global sporting arms race: An international study on sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. Oxford: Meyer & Meyer.
   Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., De Knop, P., & van Bottenburg, M. (2009a). An analysis of homogeneity and heterogeneity of elite sports systems in six nations. International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, 10(2), 111–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., De Knop, P., Van Bottenburg, M., & Shibli, S. (2006). A conceptual framework for analysing sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(2), 185–215.
   Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., De Knop, P., van Bottenburg, M., Shibli, S., & Bingham, J. (2009b). Explaining international sporting success: An international comparison of elite sport systems and policies in six countries. Sport Management Review, 12, 113–136.
   Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., Heyndels, B., De Knop, P., van Bottenburg, M., & Shibli, S. (2008b). The paradox of measuring success of nations in elite sport. Belgeo: Revue Belge de Geographie, 2, 217–234.
   Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., Shibli, S., van Bottenburg, M., De Knop, P., & Truyens, J. (2010). Developing a method for comparing the elite sport systems and policies of nations: A mixed research methods approach. Journal Of Sport Management, 24(5), 567–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., Shibli, S., Westerbeek, H., & Van Bottenberg, M. (2015). Successful elite sport policies: An international comparison of the sports policy factors leading to international sporting success (SPLISS 2.0) in 15 Nations. Maidenhead: Meyer and Meyer.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2008). Comparative analysis: Case-oriented versus variable-oriented research. In D. Della Porta, & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective (pp. 198–222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Digel, H., Barra, M., Bosel, J., Fahrner, M., Kohl, M., & Utz, A. (2002). Organisation of high performance athletics in selected countries: Final report for the International Athletics Federation. Tubingen: University of Tubingen.
   Google Scholar
• Digel, H., Burk, V., & Fahrner, M. (2006). High performance sport: An international comparison. Tubingen: Brauer.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 2016, 147–160.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, M., Brown, P., Legg, D., & Grix, J. (2018). Deconstructing comparative sport policy analysis: Assumptions, challenges, and new directions. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 10(4), 687–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, B. (2005). When less is more: Selection problems in large-N and small-N cross-national comparisons. International Sociology, 20(2), 133–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenberg, M. (2003). Composite indicators of country performance: A critical assessment. OECD, Science Technology and Industry Working Papers, 16, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. (2004). Power, policy and political priorities: Elite sport development in Canada and the United Kingdom. Sociology of Sport Journal, 21(4), 376–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M., & Houlihan, B. (2004). Advocacy coalitions and elite sport policy change in Canada and the United Kingdom. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 39(4), 387–403.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M., & Houlihan, B. (2005). Elite sport development: Policy learning and political priorities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M., & Oakley, B. (2001). Elite sport development systems and playing to win: Uniformity and diversity in international approaches. Leisure Studies, 20, 247–267.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, I., Amara, M., Al-Tauqi, M., & Lee, P. C. (2005). A typology of approaches to comparative analysis of sports policy. Journal of Sport Management, 19(4), 480–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B. (2009). Mechanisms of international influence on elite sport policy. International Journal of Sport Policy, 1(1), 51–70.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B. (2013). Theorising the analysis of sport policy. In I. Henry & L.-M. Ko (Eds.), Handbook of sport policy (pp. 11–22). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., & Green, M. (2008). Comparative elite sport development: Systems, structures and public policy. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, H. G. e. (1989). The economic impact and importance of sport in Europe: A European study. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, G. B. (2010). A theory-based logic model for innovation policy and evaluation. Research Evaluation, 19(4), 263–273. doi:10.3152/095820210(12827366906445)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowell, R. (1998). How comparative is comparative research? American Behavioral Scientist, 42(2), 168–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, A. (2005). A critique of the use of path dependency in policy studies. Public Administration & Society, 83, 553–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landman, T., & Carvalho, E. (2017). Issues and methods in comparative politics (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. American Political Science Review, 65(3), 682–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, B., & Green, M. (2001). The production of Olympic champions: International perspectives on elite sports development systems. European Journal for Sport Management, 8(1), 83–105.
   Google Scholar
• Øyen, E. (1990). Comparative methodology: Theory and practice in international social research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2009). Middle range realism. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 41, 283–325.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2013). The science of evaluation: A realist manifesto. Leeds: University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. D., & Boaz, A. (2004). Evidence-based policy, theory-based synthesis, practice-based reviews. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (2004). Realist evaluation. Evaluation, 48, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & King, D. S. (2005). The politics of path dependency: Political conflict in historical institutionalism. Journal of Politics, 67, 1275–1300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2005). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (2006). How to lure analytic social science out of the doldrums: Some lessons from comparative research. International Sociology, 21(5), 633–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (2014). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riordan, J. (1999). The impact of communism on sport. In J. Riordan & A. Kruger (Eds.), The international politics of sport in the 20th century (pp. 48–66). London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Riordan, J., & Jones, R. (1999). Sport and physical education in China. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Oxford: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, J. M. (2007). Participation studies and cross-national comparison: Proliferation, prudence, and possibility. Cultural Trends, 16(2), 99–196.
   Google Scholar
• Shibli, S., Bingham, J., & Henry, I. (2007). Measuring the sporting success of nations. In I. Henry & Institute of Sport and Leisure Policy (Eds.), Transnational and comparative research in sport: Globalisation, governance and sport policy (pp. 61–81). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (1988). Conceptual frameworks in comparative inquiry: Divergent or convergent? International Sociology, 3(3), 207–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L., & Kroger, R. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, M. (2009). The influence of non-domestic factors on elite sport development and anti-doping policy: The cases of Japan and UK/England (Unpublished PhD thesis). Loughborough University, Loughborough.
   Google Scholar