Information Sharing in a Supply Chain: Using Agency Theory to Guide the Design of Incentives

References

• Agrell, P. J., Lindroth, R., & Norrman, A. (2004). Risk, information and incentives in telecom supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 90(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Baiman, S., & Rajan, M. (2002). Incentive issues in inter-firm relationships. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(3), 213.
   Google Scholar
• Barratt, M. (2004). Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(1), 30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Basov, S. (2003). Incentives for boundedly rational agents. Topics in Theoretical Economics, 3(1), 1093.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. E. (2006). Incentives: Motivation and the economics of information (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, S., & Meindl P. (2001). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. N. (1983). Collusion and the incentives for information sharing. The Rand Journal of Economics, 14(2), 383.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, C. J., DeCroix, G. A., & Ha, A. Y. (2005). Optimal shared-savings contracts in supply chains: Linear contracts and double moral hazard. European Journal of Operational Research, 163(3), 653–667.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, A. (2000). E-business: From demand networks to techno logistics. Supply Chain Forum-An International Journal, 1(1), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, S. E., Magnan, G. M., & Williams, A. J. (2004). Supply chain trust is within your grasp. Supply Chain Management Review, 8(2), 20.
   Google Scholar
• Fiala, P. (2005). Information sharing in supply chains. Omega, 33(5), 419–423.
   Google Scholar
• Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Selfdetermination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.
   Google Scholar
• Grean, M., & Shaw, M. J. (2002). Supply- chain integration through information sharing: Channel partnership between Wal-mart and Proctor and Gamble. Retrieved January 12, 2007, from Centre for IT and e-Business Management, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign database http://citebm.cba.uiuc.edu/ITcases/GraenShawPG.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P., & Saunders, C. (1997). Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organization Science, 8(1), 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann-Wendels, T. (1993). Optimal incentives and asymmetric distribution of information. European Journal of Operational Research, 69(2), 143.
   Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B., & Tirole, J. (1991). Transfer pricing and organizational form. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 7(2), 201–208.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, L. (2001). Collaboration: The key to value creation in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6(5), 205–207.
   Google Scholar
• Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 465–485.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, R. D., & Flores, B. E. (2001). Forecasting practices of Canadian firms: Survey results and comparisons. International Journal of Production Economics, 70(2), 163–174.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, K. (2001). Technologies for supporting supply chain management. Communications of the ACM, 44(6), 58–61.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, K., & van Dissel, H. G. (1996). Sustainable collaboration: Managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems. MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 279–299.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V, & Whang, S. (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Science, 43(4), 546.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Whang, S. (1999). Decentralized multi-echelon supply chains: Incentives and information. Management Science, 45(5), 633.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Kim, Y. (1999). Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing: Conceptual framework and empirical validation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 29
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., Sikora, R., Shaw, M. J., & Woo Tan, G. (2006). A strategic analysis of inter organizational information sharing. Decision Support Systems, 42(1), 251–266.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. (2002). Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition. Management Science, 48(9), 1196.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., & Lin, B. (2006). Accessing information sharing and information quality in supply chain management. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1641–1656.
   Google Scholar
• Marilyn, M. H., Lawrence, P. E., & Sharon, C. (2000). Supply chain forecasting: Collaborative forecasting supports supply chain management. Business Process Management Journal, 6(5), 392–407.
   Google Scholar
• Mason-Jones, R., & Towill, D. R. (2000). Coping with uncertainty: Reducing “bullwhip” behaviour in global supply chains. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 1(1), 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, R. P., & McMillan, J. (1986). Bidding for contracts: A principal-agent analysis. The Rand Journal of Economics, 17(3), 326–338.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, T. S., Head, M., & Yuan, Y. (2002). Supply chain collaboration alternatives: Understanding the expected costs and benefits. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 12(4), 348–364.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, W. (2005). Microeconomic theory: Basic principles and extensions (9th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson/SouthWestern.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porteus, E. L., & Whang, S. (1991). On manufacturing/marketing incentives. Management Science, 37(9), 1166.
   Google Scholar
• Raghunathan, S. (2003). Impact of demand correlation on the value of and incentives for information sharing in a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(3), 634.
   Google Scholar
• Ronchi, S., Luzzini, D., & Spina, G. (2007). Supply chain coordination: The problem of risk and benefit sharing. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 8(2).
   Google Scholar
• Shavell, S. (1979). Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 53–73.
   Google Scholar
• Subramani, M. (2004). How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 45–73.
   Google Scholar
• Togar, M. S., Alan, C. W., & Ramaswami, S. (2002). The knowledge of coordination for supply chain integration. Business Process Management Journal, 8(3), 289.
   Google Scholar
• Tyson, D. E. (1996). Profit sharing in Canada: The complete guide to designing and implementing plans that really work. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Verity, J. (1997). Collaborative forecasting: Vision quest.
   Google Scholar
• Computerworld, 31(45), S12.
   Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. H., & Deci, E. L. (1970). Management and motivation: Selected readings. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, E. A., Harrison, D. K., & Jordan, M. (2004). Information systems development within supply chain management. International Journal of Information Management, 24(5), 375–385.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, K., & Dong, Y. (2004). Information gaming in demand collaboration and supply chain performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 121.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L., & Beamon, B. M. (2006). Supply chain coordination and cooperation mechanisms: An attribute-based approach. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 42(1), 4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, N., & Farley, T. (2006). Information sharing and control in homogenous and heterogeneous supply networks under different market conditions. International Journal of Modeling & Simulation, 26(2), 160.
   Google Scholar