References
- Van Nechel C, Toupet M, Bodson I. The subjective visual vertical. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2001; 58: 77–87
- Pavlou M, Wijnberg N, Faldon M, Bronstein A. Effect of semicircular canal stimulation on the perception of the visual vertical. J Neurophysiol 2003; 90: 622–30
- Friedmann G. The judgement of the visual vertical and horizontal with peripheral and central vestibular lesions. Brain 1970; 93: 313–28
- Friedmann G. The influence of unilateral labyrinthectomy on orientation in space. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1971; 71: 289–98
- Bohmer A, Rickenmann J. The subjective visual vertical as a clinical parameter of vestibular function in peripheral vestibular diseases. J Vestib Res 1995; 5: 35–45
- Bergenius J, Tribukait A, Brantberg K. The subjective horizontal at different angles of roll-tilt in patients with unilateral vestibular impairment. Brain Res Bull 1996; 40: 385–91
- Committee of Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the diagnosis and evaluation of therapy in Menière's disease. American Academy of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Foundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 113: 181–5
- Jongkees L, Maas J, Philipszoon A. Clinical nystagmography: a detailed study of electro-nystagmography in 341 patients with vertigo. Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel) 1962; 24: 65–93
- Davies R, Luxon L. Dizziness following head injury a neuro-otological study. J Neurol 1995; 242: 222–30
- British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedure for pure tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. Br J Audiol 1981; 15: 213–6
- Shrout P, Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420–8
- Tabak S, Collewijn H, Boumanns L. Deviation of the subjective vertical in longstanding unilateral vestibular loss. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; 117: 1–6
- Yelnik A, Lebreton F, Bonan I, Colle F, Meurin F, Guichard J, et al. Perception of verticality after recent cerebral hemispheric stroke. Stroke 2002; 33: 2247–53
- Tribukait A, Bergenius J. The subjective visual horizontal after stapedotomy: evidence for an increased resting activity in otolithic afferents. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1998; 118: 299–306
- Hafstrom A, Franson P, Karlberg M, Magnusson M. Idiosyncratic compensation of the subjective visual horizontal and vertical in 60 patients after unilateral vestibular deafferentation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2004; 124: 165–71
- Mittelstaedt H. Somatic versus vestibular gravity reception in man. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1992; 656: 124–39
- Betts G, Curthoys I. Visually perceived vertical and visually perceived horizontal are not orthogonal. Vision Res 1998; 38: 1989–99
- Pettorossi V, Bambagioni D, Bronstein A, Gresty M. Assessment of perception of verticality and horizontality with self paced saccades. Exp Brain Res 1998; 121: 46–50
- Bronstein A, Yardley L, Moore A, Cleeves L. Visually and posturally mediated tilt illusion in Parkinson's disease and in labyrinthine defective subjects. Neurology 1996; 47: 651–6
- Mezey L E, Curthoys I S, Burgess A M, Goonetilleke S C, MacDougall H G. Changes in ocular torsion position produced by a single visual line rotating around the line of sight – visual ‘entrainment’ of ocular torsion. Vision Res 2004; 44: 397–406
- Bohmer A, Mast F, Jarchow T. Can a unilateral loss of otolithic function be clinically detected by assessment of the subjective visual vertical?. Brain Res Bull 1996; 40: 423–9
- Kobayashi H, Hayashi Y, Higashino K, Saito A, Kunihiro T, Kanjaki J, et al. Dynamic and static subjective visual vertical with ageing. Auris, Nasus, Larynx 2002; 29: 325–8