References
- Davis A C, Hind S. The newborn hearing screening programme in England. Int J Ped Otorhinol 2003; 67 (Suppl 1): S193–6
- Thompson D C, McPhillips H, Davis R L, Lieu T L, Homer C J, Helfand M D. Universal newborn hearing screening summary of evidence. J Am Med Acad 2001; 286: 2000–10
- American National Institutes of Health. Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. NIH Consensus Statement 1993; 11: 1–24
- Galambos R, Wilson M J, Silva P D. Identifying hearing loss in the intensive care nursery: a 20-year summary. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5: 151–62
- Fonseca S, Forsyth H, Grigor J, Lowe J, MacKinnon M, Price E, et al. Identification of permanent hearing loss in children: are targets for outcome measures attainable. Br J Audiol 1999; 33: 135–43
- Rowe S J. An evaluation of ABR audiometry for the screening and detection of hearing loss in ex-SCBU infants. Br J Audiol 1991; 25: 259–74
- UK Census Dissemination Unit. Deprivation scores based on 1991area statistics: DOE Index of Local Conditions, http://census.ac.uk/dcu/
- Fortnum H, Summerfield Q, Marshall D H, Davis A C, Bamford J M. Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study. Br Med J 2001; 323: 536
- Davis A C, Bamford J, Wilson I, Ramkalawan T, Forshaw M, Wright S. A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment. Health Technol Assess 1997; 1: 1–176
- Hyde M, Riko K, Malizia K. Audiometric accuracy of the click ABR in infants at risk for hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 1990; 1: 59–66
- Yoshinago-Itano C, Sedey A L, Coulter D K, Mehli A L. Language of early and later identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 1998; 102: 1161–71
- Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2000 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs. Am J Audiol 2000; 9: 9–29
- Humphreys B. The ascertainment and management of defective hearing in the very young. Public Health 1957; 71: 221–8
- Howarth I E. Screening tests of hearing in pre-school children, with particular reference to selective testing. Med Off 1958; 100: 307–8
- Hamilton F W, Richards ID G, Barron M C, Mackie E M, Finlayson MJ W. The at risk register in Glasgow. Med Off 1968; 119: 201–2
- Knox E G, Mahon D F. Evaluation of infant at risk registers. Arch Dis Child 1970; 45: 634–9
- Mencher G T, Davis A C, DeVoe S J, Beresford D, Bamford J M. Universal neonatal hearing screening: past, present and future. Am J Audiol 2001; 10: 3–12
- Gerber S. Review of a high risk register for congenital and early onset deafness. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 347–56
- Wood S, Davis A C, McCormick B. Changing performance of the health visitor distraction test when targeted neonatal screening is introduced in a health district. Br J Audiol 1997; 31: 55–61
- Sutton G, Rowe S. Risk factors for deafness in the Oxford Region. Br J Audiol 1997; 31: 39–54
- Watkin P M, Baldwin M, McEnery G. Neonatal at risk screening and the identification of deafness. Arch Dis Child 1991; 45: 1130–5
- Wood S, Farnsworth A, Davis A. The identification and referral of babies with a family history of congenital hearing loss for hearing screening. J Audiol Med 1995; 4: 25–33
- Watkin P M, Baldwin M, Laoide S. Parental suspicion and the identification of hearing impairment. Arch Dis Child 1990; 65: 846–50
- Fortnum H, Davis A, Butler A, Stevens J. Health service changes in the aetiology and referral pattern of hearing impaired children in Trent 1985–1993. Report to Trent Health. MRC Institute of Hearing Research and Trent Health