Peripheral and Central Audiological Sequelae of Closed Head Injury: Function, Activity, Participation and Quality of Life

References

• Starmark J E, Stalhammar D, Holmgren E. The Reaction Level Scale (RLS 85). Manual and guidelines. Acta Neurochir 1988; 91: 12–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigler E D. Traumatic Brain Injury. PRO-ED, Inc, AustinUSA 1990; 1–103
   Google Scholar
• Emilien G, Waltregny A. Traumatic brain injury, cognitive and emotional dysfunction. Impact of clinical neuropsychology research. Acta Neurol Belg 1996; 96: 89–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood R LI, McMillan T M. Neurobehavioural disability and social handicap following traumatic brain injury. Psychology Press Ltd, East SussexUK 2001
   Google Scholar
• Davies R A, Luxon L M. Dizziness following head injury: a neuro-otological study. J Neurol 1995; 242: 222–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmer R L, Griest S E. Chronic tinnitus resulting from head or neck injuries. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 821–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergemalm P O. Progressive hearing loss after closed head injury – a predictable outcome?. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123: 836–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockrell J L, Gregory S A. Audiological deficits in brain-injured children and adolescents. Brain Injury 1992; 6: 261–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keller I, Schlenker A, Pigache R M. Selective impairment of auditory attention following closed head injuries or right cerebrovascular accidents. Cognitive Brain Research 1995; 3: 9–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek F E, Baran J A, Pinheiro M L. Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Audiology 1990; 29 304–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gollegly K M, Musiek F E. Auditory dysfunction in a patient with subcortical and insular involvement. Seminars in Hearing 1993; 3: 245–53
   Google Scholar
• Stephens D, Zhao F. The role of a family history in King Kopetzky Syndrome (obscure auditory dysfunction). Acta Otolaryngol 2000; 120: 197–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjell C, Tenenbaum A, Rosenhall U. Auditory function in whiplash-associated disorders. Scand Audiol 1999; 1: 203–9
   Google Scholar
• ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. World Health Organization. 2001
   Google Scholar
• Borg E, Wilson M, Samuelsson E. Towards an Ecological Audiology. Stereophonic listening chamber and acoustic environmental tests. Scand Audiol 1998; 27: 195–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg E, Samuelsson E, Danermark B, Rönnberg J. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students. Scand Audio Suppl 1999; 50: 1–35
   Google Scholar
• Ringdahl A, Eriksson-Mangold M, Andersson G. Psychometric evaluation of the Gothenburg Profile for measurement of experienced hearing disability and handicap: applications with new hearing aid candidates and experienced hearing aid users. British Journal of Audiology 1998; 32: 375–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie K, Moss-Morris R. Coping with chronic illness. Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine, A Baum, S Newman, J Weinman, R West, C McManus. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeUK 1997; 84–7
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus R S, Folkman S. The Coping Process: An Alternative to Traditional Formulations. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping, R S Lazarus, S Folkman. Springer Publishing Company, Inc, New York 1984; 141–80
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson A K, Rosenhall U. Clinical application of distorted speech audiometry. Scand Audiol 1995; 24: 155–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsan-Bengtsen M. Distorted speech audiometry. A methodological and clinical study. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1973; 310: 1–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Persson J, Andrich R, van Beekum T, Brodin H, Lorentsen O, Wessels R, de Witte L. Preference based assessment of quality of life of disabled persons. Technology and Disability 2002; 14: 119–24
   Google Scholar
• Bergemalm P O, Borg E. Long-term objective and subjective audiological consequences of closed head injury. Acta Otolaryngol 2001; 121: 724–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attias J, Reshef I, Shemesh Z, Salomon G. Support for the central theory of tinnitus generation: a military epidemiological study. International Journal of Audiology 2002; 41: 301–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson G N, Gannon R P, Chung D Y, Mason K. Auditory and vestibular damage in 100 work-related head injuries. J Laryngol Otol 1981; 95: 1213–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W, Byrne D, Lepage B. Effects on sound localization of configuration and type of hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 992–1005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke S, Bellmann Thiran A, Maeder P, Adriani M, Vernet O, et al. What and Where in human audition: selective deficits following focal hemispheric lesions. Exp Brain Res 2002; 147: 8–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubinski R, Moscato S, Willer B S. Prevalence of speaking and hearing disabilities among adults with traumatic brain injury from a national household survey. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 103–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller K. Deafblindness: a challenge for assessment – is the ICF a useful tool. Int Audiol 2003; 42 (Suppl 1): 140–2
   Google Scholar
• Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for?. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 11–12: 596–601
   Google Scholar
• Logemann J A. Evaluation and Treatment of Swallowing Disorders. PRO-ED, Inc, Austin, Texas 1983
   Google Scholar
• Castell D O. The Esophagus2nd edn. Little, Brown and Company. 1995, Chapter 2, 10, 11, 14 & 15
   Google Scholar