50
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Clinical Trial of a Low-cost, High Power Compression Hearing Aid

, , &
Pages 76-81 | Published online: 11 Jul 2009

References

  • WHO. Guidelines for hearing aids and services for developing countries. Prevention of Blindness and Deafness. Hearing Aids Working Group. PBD/PDH/01.12nd. World Health organization, Geneva
  • Byrne D, Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear 1986; 7: 257–65
  • Cox R M, Hyde M, Gatehouse S, Noble W, Dillon H, Bentler R, et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 106–15
  • Cox R M, Alexander C G. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. International Journal of Audiology 2002; 41: 30–5
  • Parving A, Christensen B. Clinical trial of a low-cost solar powered hearing aid. Acta Otolar 2004; 124: 416–20
  • Parving A. The value of speech audiometry in hearing-aid rehabilitation. Scand Audiol 1991; 20: 159–64
  • ISO 8253 1–3. Acoustics-audiometric test methods. Part I. Basic pure-tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva 2000
  • ISO 389–3. Acoustics: Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 3: Reference equivalent threshold force levels for pure tones and bone vibrators. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva 1994
  • ISO 7566. Acoustics: Standard reference zero for the calibration of pure tone conduction audiometers and bone vibrators. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva 1994
  • Sullivan R F. An acoustic coupling-based classification system for hearing aid fittings. Hear Inst 1985; 36: 25–32
  • McCandless G A, Lyregaard P E. Prescription of gain/output (POGO) for hearing aids. Hear Inst 1983; 34: 16–8
  • Larson V D, Williams D W, Henderson W G, Luethke L E, Beck L B, Noffsinger D, Wilson R H, et al. Efficacy of three commonly used hearing aid circuits: a crossover trial. JAMA 2000; 284: 1806–13
  • Noffsinger D, Haskell G B, Larson V D, Williams D W, Wilson E, Plunkett S, Kenworthy D. Quality rating test of hearing aid benefit in the NIDCD/VA clinical trial. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 291–300
  • Parving A, Sibelle P. Clinical study of hearing instruments: a cross-sectional longitudinal audit based on consumer experiences. Audiology 2001; 40: 43–53
  • Wood S A, Lutman M E. Relative benefits of linear analogue and advanced digital aids. Int. J Audiol 2004; 43: 144–55
  • Moore B CJ, Stone M A, Alcantara J I. Comparison of the electroacoustic characteristics of five hearing aids. Br J Audiol 2001; 35: 307–25

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.