Individual susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss

References

• Pyykko I, Koskimies K, Starck J, Pekkarinen J, Farkkila M, Inaba R. Risk factors in the genesis of sensorineural hearing loss in Finnish forestry workers. Br J Ind Med. 1989; 46: 439–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeStefano AL, Gates GA, Heard-Costa N, Myers RH, Baldwin CT. Genomewide linkage analysis to presbyacusis in the Framingham heart study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003; 129: 285–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viljanen A EP, Kaprio J, Pyykkö I, Koskenvuo M, Rantanen T. Genetic and environmental influences on hearing in older women. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2006. ( in press).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenhall U. The influence of ageing on noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health. 2003; 5: 47–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson DW. Estimating the risk of hearing loss due to exposure to continuous noise. Occupational Hearing Loss, DW Robinson. Academic Press, London 1971; 43–62
   Google Scholar
• Robinson DW, Shipton MS. Tables for the estimation of noise-induced hearing loss. NPL Acoustics Report Ac 61 (2nd). Teddigton, MxUK: National Physical Laboratory, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson DW, Sutton GJ. Age effect in hearing: a comparative analysis of published threshold data. Audiology. 1979; 18: 320–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prince MM. Distribution of risk factors for hearing loss: implications for evaluating risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002; 112: 557–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 1999: 1990 Acoustics – Determination of Occupational Noise Exposure and Estimation of Noise-induced Hearing Impairment. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• EC Directive 89/391/EC: Council directive on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work. Brussels: European Community, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• EC Directive 2003/10/EC: Council directive on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (noise). Brussels: European Community, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Starck J, Pekkarinen J, Pyykko I. Impulse noise and hand-arm vibration in relation to sensory neural hearing loss. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1988; 14: 265–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyykko I, Starck J, Pekkarinen J. Further evidence of a relation between noise-induced permanent threshold shift and vibration-induced digital vasospasms. Am J Otolaryngol. 1986; 7: 391–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pyykkö I, Starck J. Sensorineural hearing loss in forestry workers: an analysis of risk factors. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1986; 59: 439–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royster LH, Lilley DT, Thomas WG. Recommended criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1980; 41: 40–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrenäs M-L. Pigmentation and noise-induced hearing loss: is the relationship between pigmentation and noise-induced hearing loss due to an ototoxic pheomelanin interaction or to otoprotective eumelanin effects? In: Prasher D, Luxon L. Advances in Noise Research. Vol 1: Biological Effects of Noise. London: Whurr; 1998. pp 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Starck J, Toppila E, Pyykko I. Smoking as a risk factor in sensorineural hearing loss among workers exposed to occupational noise. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999; 119: 302–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrite SSV. Joint effects of smoking, noise exposure and age on hearing loss. Occup Med (Lond) 2005; 55: 48–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizoue T, Miyamoto T, Shimizu T. Combined effect of smoking and occupational exposure to noise on hearing loss in steel factory workers. Occup Environ Med. 2003; 60: 56–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruickshanks KJ, Klein R, Klein BE, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM, Tweed TS. Cigarette smoking and hearing loss: the epidemiology of hearing loss study. J Am Med Assoc. 1998; 279: 1715–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makitie AA, Pirvola U, Pyykko I, Sakakibara H, Riihimaki V, Ylikoski J. The ototoxic interaction of styrene and noise. Hear Res. 2003; 179: 9–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crifo S. Aspirin ototoxicity in the guinea pig. Journal of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & its Related Specialties. 1975; 37: 27–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toppila E, Pyykko II, Starck J, Kaksonen R, Ishizaki H. Individual risk factors in the development of noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health. 2000; 2: 59–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iki M, Kurumatani N, Hirata K, Moriyama T, Satoh M, Arai T. Association between vibration-induced white finger and hearing loss in forestry workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1986; 12: 365–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer KT, Griffin MJ, Syddall HE, Pannett B, Cooper C, Coggon D. Raynaud's disease, vibration induced white finger, and difficulties in hearing. Occup Environ Med. 2002; 59: 640–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosen S, Olin P. Hearing loss and coronary heart disease. Arch Otolaryngol. 1965; 82: 236–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg E. Noise-induced hearing loss in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hear Res. 1982; 8: 117–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyykko I, Koskimies K, Starck J, Pekkarinen J, Inaba R. Evaluation of factors affecting sensory neural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1988; 449: 155–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toppila E, Pyykko I, Starck J. Age and noise-induced hearing loss. Scand Audiol. 2001; 30: 236–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyykkö I SJ, Toppila E, Johnson A-C. Methodology and value of databases. Noise Research Network Publications, London 2001; 387–99
   Google Scholar
• Royster RJ, Berger EH. Guidelines for developing an effective hearing conservation program. Sound Vib. 1982; 16: 22–5
   Google Scholar
• Franks JR, Davis RR, Kreig EF, Jr. Analysis of a hearing conservation program database: factors other than workplace noise. Ear Hear. 1989; 10: 273–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suvorov G, Denisov E, Antipin V, Kharitonov V, Starck J, Pyykko I, Toppila E. Effects of peak levels and number of impulses on hearing among forge hammering workers. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001; 16: 816–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campo LP. Intermittent noise and equal energy hypothesis. Noise-induced hearing loss, AL Dancer, D Henderson, RJ Salvi, RP Hamernik. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis 1992; 456–66
   Google Scholar
• Earshen JJ. Sound Measurement: Instrumentation and Noise Descriptors. Noise and Hearing Conservation Manual, EH Berger, WD Ward, JC Morrill, LH Royster. Am Ind Hyg Assoc. 1986; 37–95
   Google Scholar
• Toppilla E. What kind of protectors are used in the EU and is their use mandatory? In: Prasher D, Luxon L, Pyykkö I, eds. Advances in noise research. Volume 2. Protection against noise. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd; 1998. pp164–166.
   Google Scholar
• Toppila E, Pyykko I, Starck J. The use of hearing protectors among forestry, shipyard and paper mill workers in Finland: a longitudinal study. Noise Health. 2005; 7: 3–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Starck PI, Toppila E, Pekkarinen J. Do the models assess noise-induced hearing loss correctly?. ACES. 1996; 7: 21–6
   Google Scholar
• Berger EH, Royster LH, Thomas WG. Presumed noise-induced permanent threshold shift resulting from exposure to an a-weighted leq of 89dB. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978; 64: 192–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith PA, Davis A, Ferguson M, Lutman ME. The prevalence and type of social noise exposure in young adults in England. Noise Health. 2000; 2: 41–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis SP, Wade A. A longitudinal study of hearing: effects of age, sex and noise. Proceedings of Nordics Noise. Stockholm; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen HM, Toppila EM, Olkinuora PS, Kuisma K. Sound exposure among the Finnish National Opera personnel. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2003; 18: 177–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Airo E PJ, Olkinuora P. Listening to music with earphones: an assessment of noise exposure. Acustica united with Acta acustica. 1996; 82: 885–94
   Google Scholar
• Davis AC, Lovell EA, Smith PA, Ferguson MA. The contribution of social noise to tinnitus in young people: a preliminary report. Noise Health. 1998; 1: 40–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pekkarinen J, Iki M, Starck J, Pyykko I. Hearing loss risk from exposure to shooting impulses in workers exposed to occupational noise. Br J Audiol. 1993; 27: 175–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfander F. Das Knalltrauma. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1975
   Google Scholar
• CHABA: Proposed damage-risk criterion for impulse noise (gunfire): report of working group 57, National Academy of Sciences National Research Council. Washington DC: Committee of Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• ACGIH. Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Cincinnati; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Dancer ALFR, Parmentier G, Buck K. Hearing Protector Performance and NIHL in extreme environments: Actual performance of hearing protectors in impulse noise/nonlinear behavior. Scientific Basis of Noise-induced Hearing Loss, A Axelsson, H Borchgrevink, R Hamernik, PA Hellstrom, D Henderson, R Salvi. Thieme, New York 1996
   Google Scholar
• ANSI. S12.9 – 1999x – part 4 draft 2. Determination of the effects of impulse noise. New York, ANSI 2000
   Google Scholar
• Ruben RJ. Redefining the survival of the fittest: communication disorders in the 21st century. Laryngoscope. 2000; 110: 241–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallberg LR, Barrenas ML. Living with a male with noise-induced hearing loss: experiences from the perspective of spouses. Br J Audiol. 1993; 27: 255–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetu R, Jones L, Getty L. The impact of acquired hearing impairment on intimate relationships: implications for rehabilitation. Audiology. 1993; 32: 363–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallberg LR, Carlsson SG. Hearing impairment, coping and perceived hearing handicap in middle-aged subjects with acquired hearing loss. Br J Audiol. 1991; 25: 323–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sintonen HPM. A 15-dimensional measure of health-related quality of life (15 d) and its applications. Quality of life assessment. Key issues in the 1990s, SR Walker, RM Rosser. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1993
   Google Scholar
• Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist. 2003; 43: 661–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joore MA, Potjewijd J, Timmerman AA, Anteunis LJ. Response shift in the measurement of quality of life in hearing impaired adults after hearing aid fitting. Qual Life Res. 2002; 11: 299–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnick W. Evaluation of industrial hearing conservation programs: a review and analysis. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1984; 45: 459–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipscombe DM. The employee education program. Hearing Conservation in Industry, Schools and the Military, DM Lipscomb. Singular Publishing Group Inc, San Diego 1994; 81–230. 1994
   Google Scholar
• Stewart AP. The comprehensive hearing conservation program. Hearing conservation in industry, schools and the military, DM Lipscomb. Singular Publishing Group Inc, San Diego 1994; 81–230
   Google Scholar
• Dement JM, Pompeii LA, Ostbye T, Epling C, Lipscomb HJ, James T, et al. An integrated comprehensive occupational surveillance system for healthcare workers. Am J Ind Med. 2004; 45: 528–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royster JD, Royster LH. Using audiometric database analysis. J Occup Med. 1986; 28: 1055–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pyykko IV, Toppila EM, Starck JP, Juhola M, Auramo Y. Database for a hearing conservation program. Scand Audiol. 2000; 29: 52–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starck TE, Pyykkö I. Do we have unnecessary hearing loss-can we improve the efficiency of hearing conservation programs?. Noise induced hearing loss basic mechanisms, prevention and control, D Henderson, D Prasher, R Kopke, R Salvi, R Hamernik. Noise Research Network Publication, London 2001; 197–202
   Google Scholar
• Auramo Y, Juhola M, Pyykko I, Nieminen O. Graphical user interface for the analysis of noise induced hearing loss. J Med Syst. 1995; 19: 323–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kentala E, Laurikkala J, Pyykko I, Juhola M. Discovering diagnostic rules from a neurotological database with genetic algorithms. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999; 108: 948–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laurikkala KE, Juhola M, Pyykkö I. Treatment of missing values with imputation for the analysis of otological data. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1999; 68: 428–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Juhola M, Viikki K, Laurikkala J, Pyykko I, Kentala E. On classification capability of neural networks: a case study with otoneurological data. Medinfo. 2001; 10: 474–8
   Google Scholar