References
- Olusanya BO, Ruben RJ, Parving A. Reducing the burden of communication disorders in the developing world. JAMA. 2006; 296: 441–4
- Shield B. Evaluation of the social and economic costs of hearing impairment. Report for Hear- it, AISBC; 2006.
- Parving A, Newton V. Editorial. Audiol Med. 2005; 3: 74–5
- Davis A, Smith P, Ferguson M, Stephens D, Gianopoulos I. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. HTA, UK 2007
- ISO 8253 1–3. Acoustics-audiometric test methods. Part I. Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. 2000.
- Acoustics: Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Reference equivalent threshold force levels for pure tones and bone vibrators. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. 1994.
- Parving A. The value of speech audiometry in hearing aid rehabilitation. Scand Audiol. 1991; 20: 159–64
- Byrne D, Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories’ (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear. 1986; 7: 257–65
- Cox RM, Alexander CG. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. J Audiol. 2002; 41: 30–5
- Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear. 1999; 20: 306–20
- Barton GR, Davis AC, Parving A, Roine R, Sorri M, Stilven S. Cross-sectional survey of adult hearing aid services in Denmark, Finland and the UK. Audiol Med. 2003; 1: 107–14
- Department of Health, England. Good practice in transforming adult hearing services for patients with hearing difficulty. June 2007.