The effects of a sound awareness pre-fitting intervention: A randomized controlled trial

References

• Jenstad L, van Tasell D, Ewert C. Hearing aid troubleshooting based on patients' descriptions. J Am Acad Audiol. 2003; 14: 347–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smeds K. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?. Ear Hear. 2004; 25: 159–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon H. Hearing aids. Sydney: Bomerang Press; Stuttgart: Thieme, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks DN. Counselling and its effect on hearing aid use. Scand Audiol. 1979; 8: 101–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman M, George CR, McCarthy D. The effect of pre-fitting counselling on the outcome of hearing aid fittings. Scand Audiol. 1994; 23: 257–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemker B, Holmes AE. Analysis of pre-fitting versus post-fitting hearing aid orientation using the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP). J Am Acad Audiol. 2004; 15: 311–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooks DN, Johnson D. Pre-issue assessment and counselling as a component of hearing aid provision. Br J Audiol. 1981; 15: 13–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webber G. Patient education: a review of the issues. Med Care. 1990; 28: 1089–1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler G, Hurley C, Buchanan K, Smith-vanHorne J. Prehospital education:effectiveness with total hip replacement surgery patients. Patient Educ Couns. 1996; 29: 189–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson-Mangold M, Ringdahl A, Bjorklund AK, Wahlin B. The active fitting (AF) programme of hearing aids: a psychological perspective. Br J Audiol. 1990; 24: 277–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephens D, Hétu R. Impairment, disability and handicap in audiology: towards a consensus. Audiology. 1991; 30: 185–200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins DB. Effectiveness of counselling-based adult group aural rehabilitation programmes: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005; 16: 485–93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak M. Neuropsychological assessment3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York 1995
   Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A. Unravelling the mystery of health. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1987
   Google Scholar
• Cox RM, Alexander GC. Expectations about hearing aids and their relationship to fitting outcome. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000; 11: 368–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear. 1999; 20: 306–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear. 1982; 3: 128–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demorest ME, Erdman SA. Development of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Disord. 1987; 52: 129–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox R, Hyde M, Gatehouse S, Noble W, Dillon H, Bentler R, et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear. 2000; 21: S106–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67: 361–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öberg M, Lunner T, Andersson G. Psychometric evaluation of hearing specific self-report measures and their associations with psychosocial and demographic variables. Audiol Med. 2007; 5: 188–99
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 1997; 8: 27–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magnusson L. Reliable clinical determination of speech recognition scores using Swedish PB words in speech-weighted noise. Scand Audiol. 1995; 24: 217–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman B, Kinnefors C. Efficient adaptive methods for measurements of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Scand Audiol. 1995; 24: 71–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C. A new digital hearing instrument. Hear Rev 1996;May:38–9.
   Google Scholar
• Schum D. Adaptive speech alignment: a new rationale made possible by DSP. Hear J. 1996; 49: 25–30
   Google Scholar
• Lunner T, Hellgren J, Arlinger S, Elberling C. A digital filterbank hearing aid: three DSP algorithms – user preference and performance. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 373–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn M. Envirograms: bringing greater utility to datalogging. Hear Rev. 2005;Nov:32–8.
   Google Scholar
• Statsoft. Inc . STATISTICA (data analysis software system). Version 7. 2004 www.statsoft.com.
   Google Scholar
• McArdle R, Chisolm TH, Abrams HB, Wilson RH, Doyle PJ. The WHO-DAS II: Measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults. Trends Amplif 2005; 9: 127–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor KS. Self-perceived and audiometric evaluations of hearing aid benefit in the elderly. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 390–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman CW, Weinstein BE. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly as a measure of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1988; 9: 81–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulrow CD, Tuley MR, Aguilar C. Sustained benefits of hearing aids. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 1402–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newman CW, Hug GA, Wharton JA, Jacobson GP. The influence of hearing aid cost on perceived benefit in older adults. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 285–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark P, Hickson L. Outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older people with hearing impairment and their significant others. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 390–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams HB, Hnath-Chisolm T, Guerreiro SM, Ritterman SI. The effects of intervention strategy on self-perception of hearing handicap. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 371–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 30–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams HB, Hnath-Chisolm T, McArdle R. A cost-utility analysis of adult group audiological rehabilitation: Are the benefits worth the cost?. J Rehab Res Dev 2002; 39: 549–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges J, Bentler R. Relating hearing aid use to well-being among older adults. Hear J 1998; 51: 39–44
   Google Scholar
• Wong LA, Hickson L, Mc Pehrson B. Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say?. Trends Amplif 2003; 7: 117–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barfod J. Speech perception processes and fitting of hearing aids. Audiology 1979; 18: 430–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rankin S, Stallings K. Patient education: Principles and Practice4th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia 2001
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson-Mangold ME. Adaptation to acquired hearing loss: the handicap experience and its determinants. Diss., University of Göteborg; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• English K. Get ready for the next big thing in audiological counselling. Hear J 2005; 58: 10–5
   Google Scholar