PET study of auditory plasticity: Helping to address decision making for cochlear implantation of adults

References

• Fallon JB, Irvine DRF, Shepherd RK. Cochlear implants and brain plasticity. Br Med Bull. 2002; 63: 183–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohl FW, Scheich H. Learning induced plasticity in animal and human auditory cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005; 15: 470–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata DK. Differences in brain structure in deaf persons on MR imaging studied with voxel based morphometry. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28: 243–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen B, Skinhoj E, Soh K, Endo H, Lassen NA. The pattern of cortical activity provoked by listening and speech revealed by rCBF measurements. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1977; 64: 268–9, 280–1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parving A, Christensen B, Salomon G, Pedersen CB, Friberg L. Regional cerebral activation during auditory stimulation in patients with cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995; 121: 438–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suárez H, Mut F, Lago G, Silveira A, De Bellis C, Velluti R, et al. Changes in the cerebral blood flow in post-lingual cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1999; 119: 239–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbizu J, Insausti R, Martí JM, Manrique M, Richter JA. Estudio de la actividad cortical auditiva mediante SPECT cerebral: validación del método y aplicación en la hipoacusia profunda bilateral. An Sist Sanit Navar. 1999; 22: 327–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis JP, Maisey MN, Chevretton EB. Positron emission tomography: a useful imaging technique for otolaryngology, head and neck surgery?. J Laryngol Otol. 1998; 112: 125–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magistretti PJ, Pellerin L, Rothman DL, Shulman RG. Energy on demand. Science. 1999; 283: 496–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordes M, Wszole ZK. Deafness and cerebral plasticity. J Nucl Med. 2003; 44: 1440–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruytjens L, Willemsen AT, van Dijk P, Wit HP, Albers FW. Functional imaging of the central auditory system using PET. Acta Oto-Laryngol. 2006; 126: 1236–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berding G, Matzke KH, Brunkhorst T, Knapp WH, Lenarz T, Lesinski-Schiedat A. PET and cochlear implant patients: the impact on selection of candidates difficult to assess. Fourth International Symposium and Workshops: Objective Measures in Cochlear Implants. Hannover, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog H, Lamprecht A, Kühn A, Roden W, Vosteen KH, Feinendegen LE. Cortical activation in profoundly deaf patients during cochlear implant stimulation demonstrated by H215O PET. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1991; 15: 369–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh SH, Kim CS, Kang EJ, Lee DS, Lee HJ, Chang SO, et al. Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a four-year time period. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003; 123: 148–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kral A, Hartmann R, Tillein J, Heid S, Klinke R. Hearing after congenital deafness: central auditory plasticity and sensory deprivation. Cereb Cortex. 2002; 12: 797–807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobey EA, Devous MD. Neuroimaging and cochlear implants: a look at how the brain hears. ASHA Leader. 2007; 12: 6–9
   Google Scholar
• Salvi RJ, Lockwood AH, Frisina RD, Coad ML, Wack DS, Frisina DR. PET imaging of the normal human auditory system: responses to speech in quiet and in background noise. Hear Res. 2002; 170: 96–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truy E. Neurofunctional imaging and profound deafness. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1999; 47: 131–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud AL, Lee HL. Predicting cochlear implant outcome from brain organization in the deaf. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007; 25: 381–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Gilley PM, Dorman MF, Baldwin R. Deprivation induced cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants. Int J Audiol. 2007; 46: 494–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uziel AS, Sillon M, Vieu A, Artieres F, Piron JP, Daures JP, Mondain M. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol. 2007; 28: 615–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito J, Sakakibara J, Iwasaki Y, Yonekura Y. Positron emission tomography of auditory sensation in deaf patients and patients with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993; 102: 797–801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DS, Lee JS, Oh SH, Kim SK, Kim JW, Chung JK, et al. Cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants. Nature. 2001; 409: 149–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, Giraud AL, Kang E, Oh SH, Kang H, Kim CS, Lee DS. Cortical activity at rest predicts cochlear implantation outcome. Cereb Cortex. 2007; 17: 909–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green KMJ, Julyan PJ, Hastings DL, Ramsden RT. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness. Hear Res. 2005; 205: 184–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffler K, Bilecen D, Schmid N, Tschopp K, Seelig J. Auditory cortical responses in hearing subjects and unilateral deaf patients as detected by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb Cortex. 1998; 8: 156–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertz N, GizewskiC ER, de Greiff A, Forsting M. Cross-modal plasticity in deaf subjects dependent on the extent of hearing loss. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005; 25: 884–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nishimura H, Hashikawa K, Doi K, Iwaki T, Watanabe Y, Kusuoka H, et al. Sign language ‘heard’ in the auditory cortex. Nature. 1999; 397: 116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud AL, Price CJ, Graham JM, Truy E, Frackowiak RS. Cross-modal plasticity underpins language recovery after cochlear implantation. Neuron. 2001; 30: 657–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura H, Doi K, Iwaki T, Hashikawa K, Oku N, Teratani T, et al. Neural plasticity detected in short- and long-term cochlear implant users using PET. Neuroreport. 2000; 11: 811–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen LG, Weeks RA, Sadato N, Celnik P, Ishii K, Hallett M. Period of susceptibility for cross-modal plasticity in the blind. Ann Neurol. 1999; 45: 451–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, Kang E, Oh SH, Kang H, Lee DS, Lee MC, et al. Preoperative differences of cerebral metabolism relate to the outcome of cochlear implants in congenitally deaf children. Hear Res. 2005; 203: 2–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen MV, Mirz F, Gjedde A. Restored speech comprehension linked to activity in left inferior prefrontal and right temporal cortices in postlingual deafness. Neuroimage. 2006; 31: 842–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naito Y, Okazawa H, Honjo I, Hirano S, Takahashi H, Shiomi Y, et al. Cortical activation with sound stimulation in cochlear implant users demonstrated by positron emission tomography. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1995; 2: 207–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okazawa H, Naito Y, Yonekura Y, Sadato N, Hirano S, Nishizawa S, et al. Cochlear implant efficiency in pre- and post-lingually deaf subjects. A study with H215O and PET. Brain. 1996; 119: 1297–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naito Y, Hirano S, Honjo I, Okazawa H, Ishizu K, Takahashi H, et al. Sound induced activation of auditory cortices in cochlear implant users with post- and pre-lingual deafness demonstrated by positron emission tomography. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh.) 1997; 17: 490–6
   Google Scholar
• Coez A, Zilbovicius M, Ferrary E, Bouccara D, Mosnier I, Ambert-Dahan E, et al. Cochlear implant benefits in deafness rehabilitation: PET study of temporal voice activations. J Nucl Med. 2008; 49: 60–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Lee DS, Oh SH, Kim CS, Kim JW, Hwang CH, et al. PET evidence of neuroplasticity in adult auditory cortex of postlingual deafness. J Nucl Med. 2003; 44: 1435–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar