Assessing the Changing Network TV Market: A Resource-Based Analysis of Broadcast Television Networks

References

• Albarran, A.B. (2002). Management of Electronic Media. Second ed. Belmont, California: Wadsworth/Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Albarran, A.B. & T. Moellinger (2002). “The top six communication industry firms: Structure, performance, and strategy,” pp. 103–122 in R.G. Picard (ed.). Media Firms: Structures, Operations and Performance. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Amit, R. & P.J.H. Schoemaker (1993). “Strategic assets and organizational rent.” Strategic Management Journal 14(1): 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1986). “Types of competition and the theory of strategy: Toward an integrative framework.” The Academy of Management Review 11(4): 791–800.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.” Journal of Management 17(1): 99–120.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J.A. & K.B. Boal (1994, Summer). “Strategic resources: Traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage.” Strategic Management Journal 15 (Special Issue Strategy: Search for New Paradigms): 131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, B.K. & J. Fulk (1996). “Executive scanning and perceived uncertainty: A multidimensional model.” Journal of Management 22(1): 1–21. Retrieved July 15, 2002, from Gale Group Database (A18345342).
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, T. & E. Marsh (1999). The Complete Directory to Prime Time Network and Cable TV Shows. New York: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S. & B. Wernerfelt (1988). “Related or unrelated diversification: A resource-based approach.” Academy of Management Proceedings: 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Choe, H. (2001, January 25). “Industry Surveys: Broadcasting & Cable.” Standard & Poor’s. Retrieved March 1, 2003 from Standard & Poor’s NetAdvantage database.
   Google Scholar
• Choe, H. (2002a, January 24). “Industry Surveys: Broadcasting & Cable.” Standard & Poor’s. Retrieved June 5, 2002 from Standard & Poor’s NetAdvantage database.
   Google Scholar
• Choe, H. (2002b, July 25). “Industry Surveys: Broadcasting & Cable.” Standard & Poor’s. Retrieved July 27, 2002 from Standard & Poor’s NetAdvantage database.
   Google Scholar
• Das, T.K. & B. Teng (2000). “A resource-based theory of strategic alliances.” Journal of Management 26(1): 31–61.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, P. (2002, February). “FCC must justify limits on media holdings.” USA Today [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/universe.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, P.H. & K.M. Weaver (1997). “Environmental determinants and individual-level moderators of alliance use.” Academy of Management Journal 40(2): 404–425.
   Google Scholar
• Donald, W.H. (1999, January). “Industry Surveys: Broadcasting & Cable.” Standard & Poor’s. Retrieved July 27, 2002 from Standard & Poor’s NetAdvantage database.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, M. (2002, September). “Program diversity and the program selection process on broadcast network television.” Media Ownership Working Group: Federal Communications Commission. [Online]. Available: http://hraunfoss.fcc. gov/edocs_ public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A10.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FCC Biennial Review Report, Section 202 of Telecommunications Act of 1996, FCC00–191 (2000) [Online]. Available: http://ftp.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/ Orders/2000 fcc00191.doc.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrier, W.J., Smith, K.G. & C.M. Grimm (1999). “The Role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A Study of industry leaders and challengers.” Academy of Management Journal 42(4): 372–388.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, C. (2000). The Business of Digital Television. Oxford: Focal Press.
   Google Scholar
• “Hollywood wired.” (2001, January). Multichannel News International. Retrieved June 21, 2002 from OneSource database.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskisson, R.E., Hitt, M.A., Wan, W.P. & D. Yiu (1999). “Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum.” Journal of Management 25(3): 417–456.
   Google Scholar
• “It’s Official: Vivendi, GE Make Deal.” (2003). General Electric. [Online]. Available: http://www.ge.com/en/company/news/vivendi_wsj.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J., Ford-Livene, M. & A. Levine (2002, September). “Broadcast Television: Survivor in a sea of competition.” Office of Plans & Policy Working Paper No. 37. Federal Communications Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T.R. (1995). Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Volume 3. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, C. (2001, July 18). “Fox clocks in with ‘24’ plan.” [Online]. Retrieved June 21, 2002 from OneSource database.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F. & S. Chan-Olmsted (2003). “Partnerships between the old and the new: Examining the strategic alliances between broadcast television networks and Internet firms in the context of convergence.” The International Journal on Media Management 5(1). [Online]. Available: http://www.mediajournal.org/modules/pub/ view.php/mediajournal-122.
   Google Scholar
• McEvily, S.K. & B. Chakravarthy (2002). “The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: An empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge.” Strategic Management Journal 23: 285–305.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. & J. Shamsie (1996). “The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965.” Academy of Management Journal 39(3): 519–543.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, V.B., Ensley, C.H., Young, T.B. & R.L. Katz (2002). Broadcast Television Fact Book. New York: Bear Sterns Equity Research.
   Google Scholar
• Milliken, F.J. (1987). “Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty.” Academy of Management Review 12(1): 133–143.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R.G. (2002). “The centrality of media firms,” pp. 1–7 in R.G. Picard (ed.), Media Firms: Structures, Operations and Performance. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. (1996). “Toward a dynamic theory of strategy,” pp. 423–461 in R.P. Rumelt, D.E. Schendel, & D.J. Teece (eds.), Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda. Harvard: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelt, R.P., Schendel, D.E. & D.J. Teece (eds.) (1996). “Fundamental issues in strategy,” pp. 9–47 in Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda. Harvard: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• SubbaNarasimha, P.N. (2001). “Strategy in turbulent environments: The role of dynamic competence.” Managerial and Decision Economics 22: 201–212.
   Google Scholar
• “TV needs ‘new paradigm’ of change to survive, Iger tells NAB.” (1998, April 7). Communications Daily. [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/universe.
   Google Scholar
• Viacom Television Stations Group. [Online]. Available: http://www.viacom.com/ prodbyunit1.tin?ixBusUnit=10000019.
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. & A. Karnani (1987). “Competitive strategy under uncertainty.” Strategic Management Journal 8(2): 187–194.
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, R.D. & J.R. Dominick (1997). Mass Media Research: An Introduction. Fifth ed. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar