Consumer Evaluations of Cable Network Brand Extensions: A Case Study of the Discovery Channels

References

• Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing 54(1): 27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barwise, P. (1993). Introduction to the special issue on brand equity. International Journal of Research in Marketing 10(1): 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R. V. (2000). Television branding as promotion. In S. T. Eastman (Ed.), Research in Media Promotion (pp. 127–159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Boush, D. M., Shipp, S., & Loken, B. (1987). Affect generalization to similar and dissimilar brand extensions. Journal of Psychology and Marketing 4(3): 225–237.
   Google Scholar
• Boush, D., & Loken, B. (1991). A process tracing study of brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research 28(1): 16–28.
   Google Scholar
• Boush, D. M. (1993). How advertising slogans can prime evaluations of brand extensions. Psychology & Marketing 10(1): 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, S. (1992). A schema unification model for the evaluations of brand extensions. Working Paper, Marketing Science Institute Report 92–123.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, S., Keller, K. L., & Sood, S. (2000). Communication strategies for brand extensions: enhancing perceived fit by establishing explanatory links. Journal of Advertising 29(4): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Broniarczyk, S. M., & Alba, J. W. (1994). The importance of the brand in brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research 31(2): 214–228.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravarti, D., MacInnis, D., & Nakamoto, K. (1990). Product category perceptions, elaborative processing and brand name extension strategies. In M. E. Goldberg, G. Gorn & R. W. Pollay (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (pp. 910–916). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Chan-Olmsted, S. M., & Jung, J. (2001). Stategizing the Net business: How the U.S. television networks diversify, brand, and compete in the age of the Internet. International Journal on Media Management 3(4): 213–225.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Basu, K. (1987). Alternative models of categorization: toward a contingent processing framework. Journal of Consumer Research 13(4): 455–472.
   Google Scholar
• Dacin, P. A., & Smith, D. C. (1994). The effect of brand portfolio characteristics on consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research 31(2): 229–242.
   Google Scholar
• Dawar, N., & Anderson, P. F. (1994). The effects of order and direction on multiple brand extensions. Journal of Business Research 30(2): 119–129.
   Google Scholar
• DeGraba, P., & Sullivan, M. W. (1995). Spillover effects, cost savings, research-and-development and the use of brand extensions. International Journal of Industrial organization 13(2): 229–248.
   Google Scholar
• Delvecchio, D. (2000). Moving beyond fit: The role of brand portfolio characteristics in consumer evaluation of brand reliability. Journal of Product & Brand Management 9(7): 457–471.
   Google Scholar
• Dupree, S. (1996, Feb. 12). Network TV: Building better brands. Media Week, 27.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, D. A., & Melkote, S. R. (1997). Leisure time and channel repertoire in a multichannel environment. Communication Research Reports 14(2): 189–194.
   Google Scholar
• Galbi, D. (2001). The new business significance of branding. International Journal on Media Management 3(4): 192–198.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo, A. E. (1992). Record number of new products in 1991. Food Review 15(3): 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, M. S., & Brodie, R. J. (1998). The importance of brand-specific associations in brand extension: further empirical results. Journal of Product & Brand Management 7(6): 509–518.
   Google Scholar
• Gujarati, D. N. (1995). Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, L., & Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2001). Enhanced TV as brand extension: TV viewers’ perception of enhanced TV features and TV commerce on broadcast networks’ web sites. International Journal on Media Management 3(4): 202–213.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, P. M., Farquhar, P. H., & Fazio, R. H. (1996). Impact of dominance and relatedness on brand extensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology 5(2): 135–159.
   Google Scholar
• John, D. R., Loken, B., & Joiner, C. (1998). The negative impact of extension: Can flagship products be diluted? Journal of Marketing 62(1): 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, K. L., & Aaker, D. A. (1992). The effecfs of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research 29(1): 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing 57(1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C. K., & Lavack, A. M. (1996). Vertical brand extensions: current research and managerial implications. Journal of Product & Brand Management 5(6): 24–37.
   Google Scholar
• Kirmani, A., Sood, S., & Bridges, S. (1999). The ownership effect in consumer responses to brand line stretches. Journal of Marketing 63(1), 88–101.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, K. B. (1998). Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, V., & Jacobson, R. (1995). Stock market reactions to brand extension announcements: the effects of brand attitude and familiarity. Journal of Marketing 59(1): 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. A. (1994). Audience fragmentation in a competitive video marketplace. Journal of Advertising Research 34(6): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. A. (1995). Network prime-time programming stragies in the 1980s. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 39(4): 482–495.
   Google Scholar
• Loken, B., & John, D. R. (1993). Diluting brand beliefs: when do brand extensions have a negative impact. Journal of Marketing 57(3): 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Mandese, J. (1993, May 17). Here come the newest brands: NBC, CBS, ABC. Advertising Age, S-1.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, W. S. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring the effects of brand equity on television program ratings performance. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, W. S., & Sutherland, J. (2000). Choice versus chance: Using brand equity theory to explore TV audience lead-in effects. Journal of Media Eeconomics 13(4): 233–249.
   Google Scholar
• McGovern, G. (2001). Content builds brands on-line. International Journal on Media Management 3(4): 198–201.
   Google Scholar
• Myers. (1997, Feb. 2). The Myers report: Media 2005. Electronic Media, 28–29.
   Google Scholar
• Myers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research 16(1): 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamoto, K., MacInnis, D. J., & Jung, H. S. (1993). Advertising claims and evidence as bases for brand equity and consumer evaluations of brand extensions. In D. A. Aaker & A. Biel (Eds.), Erand Equity and Advertising (pp. 281–297). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A., Atkin, D. J., & Jeffres, L. W. (2001). Reconceptualizing channel repertoire in the urban cable environment. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 45(3): 464–482.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. W., Milberg, S., & Lawson, R. (1991). Extension boundaries of two types of brand names: Role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistencey. Journal of Consumer Research 18(2): 185–193.
   Google Scholar
• Park, R. E. (1966). Estimation with heteroscedastic error terms. Econometrica 34(4): 888.
   Google Scholar
• Perse, E. M., Ferguson, D. A., & McLeod, D. M. (1994). Cultivation in the newer media environment. Communication Research 21(1): 79–104.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, K., & Brodie, R. J. (1998). How advertising slogans can prime evaluations of brand extensions: Further empirical results. Journal of Product & Brand Management 7(6): 497–508.
   Google Scholar
• Rangaswamy, A., Burke, R. R., & Oliva, T. A. (1993). Brand equity and the extendibility of brand names. International Journal of Research in Marketing 10(1): 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Romeo, J. B. (1990). The effect of negative information on the evaluation of brand extension and the family brand. In R. H. Holman & M. R. Solomon (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 18, pp. 399–406). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sheinin, D. A., & Schmitt, B. H. (1994). Extending brand with new product concepts: the role of category attribute congruity, brand affect, and brand breadth. Journal of Business Research 31(1): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Shocker, A. D., Srivastava, R. K., & Ruekert, R. W. (1994). Challenges and opportunities facing brand management: an introduction to the special issue. Journal of Marketing Research 31(2): 149–158.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. C., & Park, C. W. (1992). The effects of brand extensions on market share and advertising efficiency. Journal of Marketing Research 29(3): 296–313.
   Google Scholar
• Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer knowledge: effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research 12(1): 16–31.
   Google Scholar
• Sunde, L., & Brodie, R. J. (1993). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions: further empirical results. International Journal of Research in Marketing 10(1): 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, V., & Bearden, W. O. (2002). The effects of price on brand extension evaluation: the moderating role of extension similarity. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 30(2): 131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Uncles, M. D. (1996). Reflections on brand management: an introduction to the special issue. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 14(7): 4–9.
   Google Scholar