Media and Entrepreneurship: What Do We Know and Where Should We Go?

References

• *Auger, P., BarNir, A. and Gallaugher, J. M. (2003). Strategic Orientation, Competition, and Internet-Based Electronic Commerce. Information Technology and Management, 4 (2–3).
   Google Scholar
• *Bakker, G. (2003). Entertainment Industrialized: The Emergence of the International Film Industry, 1890–1940. Enterprise and Society, 4 (4).
   Google Scholar
• *Banks, M. (2003). Managing Creativity and Competitive Advantage in SMEs: Examining Creative, New Media Firms, in Competitive Advantage in SMEs: Organizing for Innovation and Change, Jones, O. and Tilley, F. (Eds.). Chichester: Willey.
   Google Scholar
• *Banks, M., Calvey, D., Owen, J. and Russell, D. (2002). Where the Art is: Defining and Managing Creativity in New Media SMEs, Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(2).
   Google Scholar
• *Blewett, R. & Farley, M. (1998). Institutional Constraints on Entrepreneurship in Kenya's Popular Music Industry, in African entrepreneurship: theory and reality, Spring, A. and McDade, B. E. (Eds.), University Press of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• *Boyle, E & Mezias, S. J. (2002a). Industry Creation, Legitimacy and Foundings: the Case of the American Film Industry, 1896–1928, in Organizational Dynamics of Creative Destruction: Entrepreneurship and the Emergence of Industries/ Mezias, S. J. & Boyle, E. (Eds.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• *Boyle, E & Mezias, S. J. (2002b). Legal Environments and the Population Dynamics of Entrepreneurship: Litigation and Foundings in the Early American Film Industry, 1897–1918, in Organizational Dynamics of Creative Destruction: Entrepreneurship and the Emergence of Industries, Mezias, S. J. and Boyle, E. (Eds.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• *Brady, A. (1995). What big companies can learn from the small. The Journal of Business Startegy, 16 (4).
   Google Scholar
• *Brindley, P. (2000). New Musical Entrepreneurs, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• *Brown, R. (2005). Performing arts creative enterprise: Approaches to promoting entrepreneurship in arts higher education. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 6 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Burke, A. (1997). Small Firm Start-up by Composers in the Recording Industry, Small Business Economics, Vol9 (6).
   Google Scholar
• *Carroll, J. (2005). What a Way to Make a Living. American Journalism Review, 27 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Casson, M. (1982). The Entrepreneur. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble Books.
   Google Scholar
• Caves, R. E. (2000). Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Colbert, F. (2003). Entrepreneurship and Leadership in Marketing the Arts. International Journal of Arts Management, 6 (1).
   Google Scholar
• *Cook, G. & Pandit, N. (2002). Innovation, small firms and clustering: insights from the British broadcasting industry, in New Technology-based Firms in the New Millennium (Vol. 2), Oakey, R., During, W. and Kauser, S. (Eds.). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P. (2004). Researching Entrepreneurship, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• *De Bruin, A. (2005). Multi-level entrepreneurship in the creative industries: New Zealand’s screen production industry. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 6 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Demers, D. (1996). Corporate newspaper structure, editorial page vigor, and social change. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, G. (2002). Understanding Media Economics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Eisenmann, T.R & Bower, J. L (2000). The Entrepreneurial M-Form: Strategic integration in Global Media Firms, Organization Science, 11 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Emes, J. (2002). Entrepreneurship in the Music Industry, RENT XVI: Research in Entrepreneurship and Small Business, November 21–22, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• *Eriksson, P. (2001). Female Entrepreneuring and Strategising: Articulations of Gendering Processes within the Finnish New Media Business, Kuluttajatutkimus-keskus, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• *Fee, C. E. (2002). The costs of outside equity control: Evidence from motion picture financing decisions. The Journal of Business, 75 (4).
   Google Scholar
• *Fitzgibbon, M. (2001). Managing Innovation in the Arts: Making Art Work, Westport, Conn: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• *Fuller-Love, N. (2000). The impact of digital technology on small business in the media industry. International Small Business Journal, 18 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Gartner, W. B. (1988). “Who is an entrepreneur” is the wrong question. American Small Business Journal, Spring.
   Google Scholar
• *Ghiglione, L. (1984). The Buying and Selling of America’s Newspapers. Indianapolis: R. J. Berg & Co.
   Google Scholar
• *Giner, J. & Sussman, B. (2002). Innovations in Newspapers: 2002 World Report, Ed. Juan Antonio Giner, Barry Sussman, Pamplona: Innovation, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• *Gordon, S. (2005). The Future of the Music Business: How to Succeed with the New Digital Technologies, Backbeat Books.
   Google Scholar
• *Gremillion, J. (1995). Showdown at generation gap. Columbia Journalism Review, 34 (2).
   Google Scholar
• *Greve, H. R. and Taylor, A. (2000). Innovations as catalysts for organizational change: Shifts in organizational cognition and search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (1).
   Google Scholar
• *Griffith, M. W. and Taylor, B. (1994). Entrepreneurs in entertainment: Putting on the top of the hat. Long Range Planning, 27 (6).
   Google Scholar
• *Griset, P. (1995). Innovation and Radio Industry in Europe during the Interwar Period, in Innovations in the European Economy between the Wars, Caron, F., Erker, P. and Fischer, W. (Eds.), Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• *Hart, S. (1996). The Small Business Guide to the Media. Benfleet: S. Hart, 1996
   Google Scholar
• *Hensmans, M. (2003). Social movement organizations: A metaphor for strategic actors in institutional fields. Organization Studies, 24 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Howat, K. J. (2000). Start-up of online ventures from a corporate base and from point zero. Publishing Research Quarterly, 16 (2).
   Google Scholar
• *Huygens, M., Baden-Fuller, C., Van Den Bosch F. A. J., and Volberda, H. W. (2001). Co-evolution of firm capabilities and industry competition: Investigating the music industry, 1877–1997. Organization Studies, 22 (6).
   Google Scholar
• *Indergaard, M. (2004). Silicon Alley: The Rise and Fall of a New Media District, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• *Jones, C. (2001). Co-evolution of entrepreneurial careers, institutional rules and competitive dynamics in American film, 1895–1920. Organization Studies, 22 (6).
   Google Scholar
• *Kaghan, W. & Barnett, G. (2001). The Desktop Model of Innovation in Digital Media, in Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: a Triple Helix of University -Industry-Government Relations, Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• *Kanter, R. M. (2002). News innovation and leadership. Nieman Reports, 56 (2).
   Google Scholar
• *Karlsson, A. (1996). The Family Business as an Heirloom, EFI Research Report, Stockholm School of Economics, April 1996.
   Google Scholar
• *Kaufman, J. (1986). Carol Taber, Working Woman. Management Review, 75 (10).
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1986). A Dictionary of Cybernetics. Retrieved from http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASC/MEDIA.html (15 April 2005).
   Google Scholar
• *Koulouvari, P. (2004). Family-owned Media Companies in the Nordic Countries: Research Issues and Challenges, JIBS, Working Paper Series, No. 2004–2.
   Google Scholar
• *Lesonsky, R. & Anderson, L. (2001). Start Right: Entrepreneur magazine's 103 Start-up Marketing Tips, CA : Entreprenuer Media.
   Google Scholar
• Low, M. B. and McMillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T. & Dess, Gregory G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. Academy of Management Review, 21 (1).
   Google Scholar
• *Mabry, D. J. (1990). The Rise and Fall of Ace Records: A Case Study in the Independent Record Business. Business History Review, 64 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Manzer, L. L., Ireland R. D. and van Auken, P. M. (1980). Image Creation in Small Business Retailing: Applications of Newspaper Advertising, Journal of Small Business Management, 18 (2).
   Google Scholar
• *McLeod, K. (2005) MP3s Are Killing Home Taping: The rise of Internet Distribution and its challenge to the major label music monopoly. Popular Music & Society, 28 (4).
   Google Scholar
• *McPherson, C. (2000). Asymmetry of information, entrepreneurship and complex environments: a study of market stimulation and destruction in the satellite television industry. European Business Review, 12 (4).
   Google Scholar
• *Mezias, J. M. and Mezias, S. J. (2000). Resource partitioning, the founding of specialist firms, and innovation: The American feature film industry, 1912–1929.Organization Science, 11 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Mezias, S. J. & Kuperman, J. C. (2001). The Community Dynamics of Entrepreneurship: the Birth of the American Film Industry, 1885–1929. Journal of Business Venturing, 16 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Molina, A. H. (1996). Innovation in the context of European R&D collaborative programmes: The case of multimedia and the newspaper industry. International Journal of Technology Management, 12 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Moss, L. (2005) Encouraging small cultural enterprises in Russia: Gateways and barriers in Russian society. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 6 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Mossig, I. (2004). The Networks Producing Television Programmes in the Cologne Media Cluster: New Firm Foundation, Flexible Specialization and Efficient Decision-making Structures. European Planning Studies, 12 (2).
   Google Scholar
• *Murphy, D. G. (1997). The entrepreneurial role of organized labour in the British Columbia motion picture industry. Relations Industrielles, 52 (3).
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. M. (2003). Audience Economics: Media Institutions and the Audience Market Place, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Neiva, E. M. (1995). Chain building: The consolidation of the American newspaper industry, 1955–1980. Business and Economic History, 24 (1).
   Google Scholar
• *Ngwainmbi, E. K. (2005). The black media entrepreneur and economic implications for the 21st century. Journal of Black Studies, 36 (1).
   Google Scholar
• *Nyberg, D. (2003). Long-term Ownership and Ownership Strategies in Family Firms: the Case of Bonniers, 1950–1990, Paper presented at seminar at JIBS (Jönköping International Business School), 9th of September 2003.
   Google Scholar
• *Owens, J. W. and Dillman Carpentier (2004). Radio Station Innovation and Risk Taking: A Survey of Programmers and General Managers. The International Journal on Media Management, 6 (3–4).
   Google Scholar
• *Peterson. R. A. & Berger, D. (1971). Entrepreneurship in Organizations: Evidence from the Popular Music Industry, Administrative Science Quarterly, 16 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G. (1989). Media Economics: Concepts and Issues. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G. (2002). The Economics and Financing of Media Companies. NY: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Picard, R. G. (2004). A Typology of Risk in Family Media Enterprises. Journal of Media Business Studies, 1 (1).
   Google Scholar
• *Poettschacher, E. (2005). Strategic creativity: How values, beliefs and assumptions drive entrepreneurs in the creative industries. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 6 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Rae, D. (2002). Entrepreneurial Emergence: a Narrative Study of Entrepreneurial Learning in Independently Owned Media Businesses. The International Journal of Eentrepreneurship and Innovation, 3 (1).
   Google Scholar
• *Rae, D. (2005). Cultural diffusion: A formative process in creative entrepreneurship. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 6 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Reese, R. M. and Stanton, W. W. (1980). “Home Grown” Audience Research for Small Radio Stations. Journal of Small Business Management, 18 (2).
   Google Scholar
• *Rentschler, Ruth, R. (2002). The Entrepreneurial Arts Leader, University of Queensland Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Sawhney, H. and Lee, S. (2005). Arenas of innovation: Understanding new configurational potentialities of communication technologies. Media, Culture & Society, 27 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Schweizer, T. (2002). Managing Interactions between Technological and Stylistic Innovation in the Media industry: Insights from the Introduction of EBook Technology in the Publishing Industry, Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management.
   Google Scholar
• *Schweizer, T. S. (2003). Managing interactions between technological and stylistic innovation in the media industries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15 (1).
   Google Scholar
• *Seidler, J. E. (1996). Ukraine startup faces tough going. Neiman Reports, 50 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: the individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S. A., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1).
   Google Scholar
• *Singer, M. H. (2003). A delicate situation family and business. Consulting to Management, 14 (2).
   Google Scholar
• *Springhall, J. (1994). ‘Disseminating impure literature’: The ‘penny dreadful’ publishing business since 1860. The Economic History Review, 47 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Thompson, J. L. (1989). Independent Motion Pictures Financing: Unregistered Limited Partnership Offerings. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1989 (4).
   Google Scholar
• *Tjernstrom, S. (1994). Strategic renewal in newspaper companies: contributions to a methodology for small business research, 8th Nordic Conference on Small Business Research : Halmstad University, Sweden, 13–15 June 1994.
   Google Scholar
• *Turner, T. (2005). My Beef With Big Media: How government protects big media –and shuts out upstarts like me. Federal Communications Law Journal, 57 (2).
   Google Scholar
• *Vedin, B-A. (1981). Media industry creativity management applied to technology. Technovation, 1 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective. In J. Katz & J. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Wacholtz, L. & Sexton, D. (1995). The Interface of Entrepreneurship and Marketing in the Music and Entertainment Industry, in Research at the marketing/entrepreneurship interface: Working Paper of the University of Illinois at Chicago Symposium on Marketing and Entrepreneurship, Hills, G. E. (Ed.), Chicago, Ill.: Institute for Entrepreneurial Studies, University of Illinois at Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• *Webber, A. M. (1992). Japanese-Style Entrepreneurship: An Interview with Softbank’s CEO, Mayoshi Son. Harvard Business Review, 70 (1).
   Google Scholar
• *Weber, W. (2004). The Musician as Entrepreneur, 1700–1914: Managers, Charlatans and Idealists, Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Wilson, N. C. and Stokes, D. (2004). Laments and serenades: relationship marketing and legitimation strategies for the cultural entrepreneur. Qualitative Market Research, 7 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Wilson, N. C. and Stokes, D. (2005). Managing creativity and innovation: The challenge for cultural entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12 (3).
   Google Scholar
• *Wineka, M. (1999). A Family Affair: The Life, Times, and Sale of a Family Owned Newspaper. Winston-Salem, N.C.: John F. Blair.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media (05 April 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. and Dess, G. G. (2001). Entrepreneurship as a field of research: Encouraging dialogue and debate. Academy of Management Review, 26 (1).
   Google Scholar