Public Policy and Independent Television Production In the U.K.

References

• Annan, Lord (1977). Report of the Committee on the Future of Broadcasting, Cmnd 6753, London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Aris, A. & Bughin, J. (2005).Managing Media Companies: Harnessing Creative Value, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bilton, C. (2007). Management and Creativity: From Creative Industries to Creative Management, London: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Broadcast (2008). ‘Indies 2008: The Annual Survey of the UK’s Independent TV Producers’, pp1–34, supplement of Broadcast, March 14 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. (1999).European Cable and Satellite Economics, Special Report published by Screen Digest.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. (1937).‘The Nature of the Firm’ reprinted in Williamson O and Winter S, The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution and Development, Oxford University Press, 1993: 18–74.
   Google Scholar
• Collie, C. (2007). The Business of TV Production, Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, T. & Price, D. (2005), Rights of Passage: British Television in the Global Market, London: BTDA.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S., Coles, H., Olczak, M., Pike, C., & Wilson, C (2004). The Benefits of Competition: some illustrative UK cases, DTI Economics Paper No 9, DTI.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C., Vladica, F., & Berkowitz, I. (2008). ‘Business Capabilities of Small Entrepreneurial Media Firms: Independent Production of Children’s Television in Canada’, Journal of Media Business Studies, 5(1): 9–39.
   Google Scholar
• Dignam, C. (2007). ‘Will small producers be drowned out by the flood of ‘super-indies’?’ Independent, July 2.
   Google Scholar
• Dowell, Ben (2008). Guardian, ‘Channel 4 fund targets “new creative generation”, March 13, 2008: 11.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, G. (2002). Understanding Media Economics, London and New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, D. (2001). ‘What use is a public inquiry? Labour and the 1977 Annan Committee on the Future of Broadcasting’, Media, Culture & Society, 3 (2): 195–211.
   Google Scholar
• Geroski, P. (2006). ‘Is Competition Policy Worth it’? Essays in Competition Policy, London: Competition Commission, 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, J., O’Keefe, A., Scneider, P., Andari R. & Bakhshi, H. (2007). Staying Ahead: the Economic Performance of the UK’s Creative Industries, London: The Work Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• ITC (2002). Program Supply Review, London: Independent Television Commission (November).
   Google Scholar
• Kung, L. (2008). Strategic Management in the Media: Theory to Practice, London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D. (2008). ‘The Way Ahead: Towards a New Communications Act’ in Gardam, T & Levy, D (2008), The Price of Plurality: Choice, Diversity and Broadcasting Institutions in the Digital Age, OFCOM, Oxford, England: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 209–216.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, B. (1998). ‘The Economics of Television Networks: New Dimensions and New Alliances’ in Alexander A. et al, Media Economics: Theory and Practice (2nd Ed), Mahwah, NJ: LEA: 131–50.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald , I., Burke, C. & Stewart, K. (2006). Systems leadership : creating positive organizations, Aldershot ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, S. (2008). ‘Plurality and the Sustainability of the British Production Industry’ in Gardam, T & Levy, D (2008), The Price of Plurality: Choice, Diversity and Broadcasting Institutions in the Digital Age, OFCOM, Oxford, England: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 91–94.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the Public Sector, at http://www.cabinet office.gov.uk/strategy/work_areas/innovation/index.asp
   Google Scholar
• Ofcom (2006a). Review of the Television Production Sector: Consultation Document, London: Ofcom, 10 January 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ofcom (2006b). Review of the Television Production Sector: Statement, London: Ofcom, 25 October 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver & Ohlbaum Associates Ltd (2006). UK Television Content in the Digital Age: Opportunities and Challenges, Report for PACT, London: PACT.
   Google Scholar
• PACT (2006). Response to Ofcom Review of the Television Production Sector, London: PACT.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, R. (2001). ‘Work histories in television’, Media, Culture & Society, 23(4): 495–520.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock, A. (1986). Report of the Committee on Financing the BBC, Cmnd 9824, London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. (2005). ‘Unique Characteristics and Business Dynamics of Media Products’, Journal of Media Business Studies 2(2): 61–9.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, A. (2002). Risky Business: Inside the Indies, Glasgow: The Research Centre (TRC) for Television and Interactivity.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, B. (1992). Making Capital from Culture, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Steemers, J. (2004). British Television in the Global Marketplace, London: BFI.
   Google Scholar
• Towse, R. (1999). ‘Copyright and Economic Incentives: An Application to Performers’ Rights in the Music Industry’, Kyklos, 52 (3): 369–390.
   Google Scholar
• Ursell, G. (2000). ‘Television production: issues of exploitation, commodification and subjectivity in UK television labour markets’, Media, Culture & Society, 22(6): 805–825.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wurff, R. (2005). ‘Competition, Concentration and Diversity in European Television Markets’, Journal of Cultural Economics, 29: 249–275.
   Google Scholar