The Adaptive Behavior of Music Firms: A Music Industry Feedback Model

References

• Abbate, J. (1999). Cold war and white heat: The origins and meanings of packet switching, in McKenzie, D. & Wajcman, J. (eds.) The social shaping of technology (2nd edition) (pp. 351–71). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlkvist, J. (2001). Programming philosophies and the rationalization of music radio. Media, Culture and Society 23: 339–359.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlkvist, J., & Faulkner, R. (2002). Will this record work for us? Managing music formats in commercial radio. Qualitative Sociology 25: 189–215.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlkvist, J., & Fisher, G. (2000). And the hits just keep on coming: music programming standardization in commercial radio. Poetics 27: 301–325.
   Google Scholar
• Alderman, J. (2001). Sonic Boom: Napster, MP3 and the new pioneers of music. London: Fourth Estate.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, R.G.D. (1955). The Engineer’s Approach to Economic Models. Economica 22: 158–68.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (1977). Double loop learning in organizations, Harvard Business Review (September):115–25.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming Organizational Defences: Facilitating Organizational Learning. Boston: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (2004). Reasons and Rationalizations: The Limits to Organizational Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Augier, M.A. (2005). Carnegie School, in Berckert, J. & Zafirovski, M. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Economic Sociology (pp. 47–51). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barfe, L. (2004). Where have all the good times gone? - The rise and fall of the record industry. London: Atlantic.
   Google Scholar
• Beinhocker, E. (2006). The adaptable corporation. McKinsey Quarterly 2006(2): 76–87.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, S. (1987). The Media Lab: Inventing the Future at MIT. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, R. (1996). The Global Jukebox. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. (1987). The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Modern Consumerism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. (2003). Playback: From the Victrola to MP3, 100 Years of Music, Machines, and Money. New York: Da Capo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A.L. (1990). Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13(1): 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, R.M., & March, J.G. (1992 [1963]). A Behavioural Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• D’Aveni, R.A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, M. (1997). The Movie Game. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Digital Music News (2006). File-sharing levels remain strong in January. Digital Music News. February 8, 2006. Retrieved October 22, 2007, from < http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/stories/020806p2p/ >.
   Google Scholar
• EMI (2004). EMI announces steps to further strengthen its business. EMI Corporate press release. March 31, 2004. Retrieved April 7, 2006, from <http://www.emigroup.com/Press/2004/press6.htm>.
   Google Scholar
• EMI (2005). EMI Annual Report 2005. Retrieved March 1, 2006, from <http://www.emigroup.com/Financial/Default.htm>.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J.W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, USA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J.W. (1968). Principles of systems. Cambridge, USA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, D. (2003). Managing Pirate Culture: Corporate Responses to Peer-to-Peer Networking. The International Journal on Media Management 5(3): 173–9.
   Google Scholar
• GLF (2005). Marknadsandelar kalenderåret 2004. Press release, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (1992). What’s wrong with Ethnography? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D. (2002). The Cultural Industries. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, P.M. (1970). The Structure of the Popular Music Industry. Survey Research Center, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Hollifield, C.A. (2003). The Economics of International Media, in Alexander A. et al (eds.). Media economics: theory and practice (pp. 85–106). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins, C., & McFadyen, S. (2004). Media Economics. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• IFPI (2005). The recording industry in numbers 2005. The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. London.
   Google Scholar
• IFPI (2007). The recording industry in numbers 2006. The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. London.
   Google Scholar
• Imfeld, C.J. (2004). Repeated resistance to new technologies: A case study of the recording industry’s tactics to protect copyrighted works in cyberspace between 1993 and 2003.
   Google Scholar
• PhD dissertation. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.S. (2004). Predicting cultural output diversity in the radio industry, 1989–2002. Poetics 32: 325–342.
   Google Scholar
• Liebowitz, S. (2002). Re-thinking the network economy. New York: Amacom.
   Google Scholar
• Lyneis, J.M. (1980). Corporate planning and policy design – A systems dynamics approach. Cambridge, USA: Pugh-Roberts Associates.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G. & Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1987). Crafting strategy. Harvard Business Review (July-August): 66–75.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, C. (2006). Uni Music tops ‘05 market share with 39%. Hollywood Reporter. Jan 5, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Negus, K. (1992). Producing Pop – culture and conflict in the popular music industry. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Negus, K. (1996). Popular Music Theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. & Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. (2003). At SXSW, A&R Reps Adjust to Tough Times. Billboard Magazine. March 29, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D.A. (1983). Some Observations on Mental Models, in Gentner, S., & Stevens, A.L. (ed.). Mental Models (pp. 7–14). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R.A. (1994). Culture studies through the production perspective, in Crane, D. (ed.). The sociology of culture: Emerging theoretical perspectives (pp. 163–190). Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A.W. (1950). Mechanical Models in Economic Dynamics. Econometrica 17: 283–305.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R.G. (2002). The Economics and Financing of Media Companies. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E. (1996). What is strategy?. Harvard Business Review (Nov-Dec): 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. London: Century Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. (1952). On the Application of Servomechanism Theory in the Study of Production Control. Econometrica 20(2).
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. (1954). Some Strategic Considerations in the Construction of Social Science Models, in Lazarsfeld, P.F. (ed.) Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences. Glencoe: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J.D. (1989). Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment. Management Science 35(3):321–339.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J.D. (1991). A Sceptic’s guide to computer models, in Barney, G.O. et al. (eds.). Managing a Nation: The Microcomputer Software Catalogue (pp. 209–229). Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J.D. (1994). Learning in and about Complex Systems. System Dynamics Review 10: 291–330.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J.D. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D.J. & Pisano, G. (1994). The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change 3(3), 537–56.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509–33.
   Google Scholar
• Thorburn, D. & Jenkins H. (eds.) (2003). Rethinking Media Change: The Aesthetics of Transition. Cambridge, USA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tustin, A. (1953). The Mechanism of Economic Systems: an approach to the problem of economic stabilisation from the point of view of control-system engineering. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, H.L. (2001). Entertainment Industry Economics (5th edition). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, R. (1995). The Future of Radio as Seen from the Outside. Nordicom-Information 1995(1): 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, D. (ed.) (2003). The Impact of New Technologies on the Traditional Media. Trends in Communication 11(2). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, K. (2002). Competitive Strategy Dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge, USA: The Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, P. (2005). The enemy of music - modeling the behavior of a cultural industry in crisis. The International Journal on Media Management 7(1&2): 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, P. (2006). Reluctantly Virtual – Modelling Copyright Industry Dynamics. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Media and Communication, Karlstad University, Sweden.
   Google Scholar