Audience Interactivity on Video Websites and the Business Implications for Online Media Platforms

References

• Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & Beckhamm, J. (Eds.), Springer Series in Social Psychology (pp.11–39). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for Public Opinion Research (2013). Response rates: An overview. Available at http://www.aapor.org/Response_Rates_An_Overview.htm
   Google Scholar
• Atkin, D., Jeffres, L., & Neuendorf, K. (1998). Understanding Internet adoption as telecommunications behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(4), 475–490.
   Google Scholar
• Atkin, D., Neuendorf, K., Jeffres, L., & Skalski, P. (2003). Predictors of audience interest in adopting digital television. Journal of Media Economics, 76(3), 159–173.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, I. (1996). Early adoption of DBS: Information, attitudes and early adoption. Paper presented at the AEJMC in Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bucy, E. (2000). Social access to the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics, 5(1), 50–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bumgarner, B. (2007, October 28). You have been poked: Exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults. First Monday, 12(11). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php-/fm/article/view/2026/1897
   Google Scholar
• Chan-Olmsted, S. M., Li, C.C., & Jung, J. (2005). The profiling of cable modem broadband subscribers: Characteristics, perceptions, and satisfaction. Journal of Targeting, Measurement, and Analysis for Marketing, 13(4), 327–345.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, B., Lee, S., & Kim, B. (2006). Exploring factors affecting the adoption and continuance of online games among college students in South Korea. New Media and Society, 8(2), 295–319.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H.-T. (2007). Sharing, connection and creation in the Web 2.0 era: Profiling the adopters of video-sharing and social-networking sites. Paper presented at the AEJMC national conference in Washington, D. C.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, C., & Leckenby, J. (1999). Interactivity as a measure of advertising effectiveness: Antecedents and consequences of interactivity in web advertising. In M. Roberts (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 162–179), Gainesville, FL: American Academy of Advertising.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, D. (2004). Into interactivity? How news websites use interactive features. Paper presented at the International Communication Association conference, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, D., & Yoo, C. (2006). Online user motivations and use of interactive features on an online news site: A uses and gratifications approach. Paper presented at the International Communication Association conference, Dresden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• comScore (2013). comScore releases November 2013 U.S. online video rankings. Available at http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2013/12/comScore_Releases_November_ 2013_U.S._Online_Video_Rankings
   Google Scholar
• comScore (2011). comScore releases July 2011 U.S. online video rankings. Available at http://www.comscore-.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2011/8/comScore_Releases_July_2011_U.S._Online_Video_Ra nkings
   Google Scholar
• Correa, T. (2010). The participation divide among “online experts”: Experience, skills and psychological factors as predictors of college students' web content creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 71–92.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, T., & Jeong, S. (2011). Race and online content creation: Why minorities are actively participating on the web. Information, Communication & Society, 14(5), 638–659.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, J. (2004). A multifaceted dynamic model of the digital divide. IT and Society, 1 (7), 66–88.
   Google Scholar
• Dupagne, M., & Driscoll, P. (2009). A discriminant analysis of high-definition Television owners and non-owners. Paper presented at the 2009 AEJMC conference in Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Eastin, M. (2002). Diffusion of e-commerce: An analysis of the adoption of four e-commerce activities. Telematics and Informatics, 19(3), 251–267.
   Google Scholar
• Eastin, M., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1083–6101.2000-.tb00110.x
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S. (2009). Latinos online. Pew Research Center. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org-/Commentary/2009/December/Latinos-Online-20062008.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Golan, G., Lim, J., & Sedita, M. (2009). The uses and gratifications of social networking sites (SNS): Investigating the roles of gender, media uses, and religiosity in predicting different motivations. Paper presented at the AEJMC national conference in Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Golding, P., & Murdock, G. (2001). Digital divides: Communications policy and its contradictions. New Economy, 8(2), p. 110–115.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. (1990). Energy in the eighties: Education, communication and the knowledge gap. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 554–566.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, L., & James, E. (1998). Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(4), 457–474.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F. Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/-article/view/942/864
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2005). Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 371–379.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602–621.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society, 11(2), 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D., Novak, T., & Scholsser, A. (2000). The evolution of the digital divide: Examining the relationship of race to Internet access and usage over time. In B. Compaine, (Ed.) The Digital Divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth? (pp. 47–98). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, M., Wotring, C., & Forrest, E. (1995). An exploratory study of the perceived benefits of electronic bulletin board use and their impact on other communication activities. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39(1), 30–50.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. (1998). Interactivity: Tracing a new concept in media and communication studies. Nordicom Review 19(1), 185–204.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, M. (2002). Digital cable: Exploring factors associated with early adoption. Journal of Media Economics, 15(3), 193–207.
   Google Scholar
• Landow, G. (1992). Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary literary theory and technology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A. (2009). Adults and social network websites: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A. (2012). Teens and online video. Pew Internet and American Life Project.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, L., & Wei, R. (1998). Factors influencing the adoption of interactive TV in Hong Kong: Implications for advertising. Asian Journal of Communication, 8(2), 124–147.
   Google Scholar
• Li. S.-C.S. (2004). Examining the factors that influence the intentions to adopt Internet shopping and cable television shopping in Taiwan. New Media and Society, 6, 173–193.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. (2001). Audience attributes, media supplementation and likely online service adoption. Mass Communication and Society, 4(1), 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Graduations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 9(4), 671–696.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, M. (2009). The audience for online video sharing sites shoots up. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved on January 25, 2010 from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/13--The-Audience-for-Online-VideoSharing-Sites-Shoots-Up.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Massey, B., & Levy, M. (1999). Interactivity, online journalism and English-language web newspapers in Asia. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(1), 138–151.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M., & Ogan, C. (1996). The Internet as mass medium. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 1(4). doi: 10.1111/j.1083–6101.1996.tb00174.x
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, G. (2010, September 20). Custom online video drives higher brand awareness, Dynamic Logic study finds. Media Post. Retrieved from http://www.media-post.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=136051
   Google Scholar
• Ostlund, L. (1974). Perceived innovation attributes as predictors of innovativeness. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(2), 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Park, N. (2008). Adoption and use of computer-based VoIP phone service: Toward an integrated model. Paper presented at the ICA conference in Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, E. (2006). Why do advertisers still covet the 18–49s? Television Quarterly, 36, 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, K. (2013). The state of online video. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available at http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Online-Video/Summary-of-Findings.aspx#content1
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, K. (2010). The state of online video. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/State-of-Online-Video/Summary-of Findings-.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. Hawkins, J. Wiemann, and S. Pingree (Eds.) Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 110–134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2(4). doi: 10.1111/j.1083–6101.1997.tb00201.x
   Google Scholar
• Reagan, J. (1987). Classifying adopters and nonadopters of four technologies using political activity, media use and demographic variables. Telematics and Informatics, 4(1), 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Roca, J., Chiu, C., & Martinez, F. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovation. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J. M., & Geyskens, I. (2006). How country characteristics affect the perceived value of web sites. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 136–150.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). Online interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 111–132.
   Google Scholar
• The Nielsen Company, (2010). Three Screen Reports of 4th Quarter, 2009 and 1st Quarter, 2010. Available at http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2010/three-screen-report-q1–2010.html
   Google Scholar
• The Nielsen Company (2011). State of the media: Cross-platform report, 1st quarter of 2011. Available at http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/cross-platform-report-q1–2011.html?status=success
   Google Scholar
• Tichenor, P., Donohue, G., & Olien, C. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(2), 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2000). United States Census 2000. Available at http://www.census-.gov/main/www/cen2000.html
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
   Google Scholar
• Wanta, W., & Elliott, W. (1995). Did the magic work: Knowledge of HIV/AIDS and the knowledge gap hypothesis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(2), 312–321.
   Google Scholar
• Website Optimization, LLC. (2011). July 2011 bandwidth report. Available at http://www.websiteoptimization.com/bw/1107/
   Google Scholar
• Wei, R. (2006). Wi-Fi powered WLAN: When built, who will use it? Exploring predictors of wireless Internet adoption in the workplace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 155–175.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. (2009). New Media and the Young Generation: Exploring predictors in young people’s adoption of webcasting. Paper presented at the 2009 AEJMC national conference, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2009). Alternative Platforms and the Audience: Exploring the predictors in the audience’s adoption of online media platforms. Paper presented at the 2009 International Communication Association national conference, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, J., & He, Z. (2002). Perceived characteristics, perceived needs, and perceived popularity: Diffusion and use of the Internet in China. Communication Research, 29(4), 466–495.
   Google Scholar
• Zmuda, N. (2009, September 22). Luxury marketers move online but most lack digital cunning. Advertising Age. Retrieved from http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=139188
   Google Scholar
• Zickuhr, K., & Smith, A. (2012). Digital differences. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Digital_differences_041312.p df
   Google Scholar