The free-to-fee transition: audiences’ attitudes toward paying for online news

References

• Brandstetter, B., & Schmalhofer, J. (2014). Paid content. A successful revenue model for publishing houses in Germany? Journalism Practice, 8(5), 499–507. doi:10.1080/17512786.2014.895519
   Google Scholar
• Chiou, L., & Tucker, C. (2013). Paywalls and the demand for news. Information Economics and Policy, 25(2), 61–69. doi:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2013.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Chyi, H. I. (2005). Willingness to pay for online news: An empirical study on the viability of the subscription model. Journal of Media Economics, 18(2), 131–142. doi:10.1207/s15327736me1802_4
   Google Scholar
• Chyi, H. I. (2012). Paying for what? How much? And why (not)? Predictors of paying intent for multiplatform newspapers. International Journal on Media Management, 14(3), 227–250. doi:10.1080/14241277.2012.657284
   Google Scholar
• Chyi, H. I., & Lee, A. M. (2013). Online news consumption. Digital Journalism, 1(2), 194–211. doi:10.1080/21670811.2012.753299
   Google Scholar
• Chyi, H. I., & Yang, M. J. (2009). Is online news an inferior good? Examining the economic nature of online news among users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(3), 594–612. doi:10.1177/107769900908600309
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J. E., & Attari, S. Z. (2012). Paying for what was free: Lessons from the New York Times Paywall. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(12), 682–687. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0251
   Google Scholar
• Danske Medier Research. (2014). Toplisten [Most visited websites]. Retrieved from http://fdim.dk/statistik2014/toplisten
   Google Scholar
• Goyanes, M. (2014). An empirical study of factors that influence the willingness to pay for online news. Journalism Practice, 8(6), 742–757. doi:10.1080/17512786.2014.882056
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. V., Jakobsen, M. B., & Hauschildt, L. J. (2013). Brugere, betalingsmur og betalingsvillighed. En modtageranalyse af betingelser for brugerbetaling på politiken.dk [Users, paywall, and willingness to pay]. Copenhagen: Department of Media, Cognition, and Communication, University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, J., & Thurman, N. (2007). Paid content strategies for news websites. An empirical study of British newspapers’ online business models. Journalism Practice, 1(2), 208–226. doi:10.1080/17512780701275523
   Google Scholar
• Hjarvard, S., & Kammer, A. (2015). Online news: Between private enterprise and public subsidy. Media, Culture & Society, 37(1), 115–123. doi:10.1177/0163443714553562
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, K. B. (2012). The complimentarity of quantitative and qualitative methodologies in media and communication research. In K. B. Jensen (Ed.), A handbook of media and communication research. Qualitative and quantitative methodologies (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., & Levine, R. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 94–101. doi:10.1093/poq/nfh006
   Google Scholar
• Krumsvik, A. H. (2012). Hvorfor er det så vanskelig å tjene penger på nettjournalistikk? [Why is making money from Internet news so difficult?]. In M. Eide, L. O. Larsen, & H. Sjøvaag (Eds.), Nytt på nett og brett. Journalistikk i forandring (pp. 55–69). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Lauf, E. (2001). Research note: The vanishing young reader: Sociodemographic determinants of newspaper use as a source of political information in Europe, 1980-98. European Journal of Communication, 16(2), 233–243. doi:10.1177/0267323101016002005
   Google Scholar
• Leckner, S., & Facht, U. (2010). A sampler of international media and communication statistics. Gothenburg: Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• McChesney, R. W. (2011). The crisis of journalism and the Internet. In G. Meikle & G. Redden (Eds.), News online. Transformations & continuities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N., & Levy, D. A. L. (Eds.). (2013). Reuters institute digital news Report 2013. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). OECD Factbook 2013: Economic, environmental and social statistics. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. (2012). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G. (1989). Media economics: Concepts and issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schrøder, K. (2007). Avislæsning i den digitale tidsalders nyhedslandskab [Newspaper reading in the news landscape of the digital age]. Journalistica, 2(5), 54–74.
   Google Scholar
• Schrøder, K., & Kobbernagel, C. (2012). Danskernes brug af nyhedsmedier 2011: En pejling af danskernes færden i nyhedsuniverset [Danes’ use of news media 2011: Charting Danes’ navigation in the news universe]. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. (2008). Why democracies need an unlovable press. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2012). The State of the news media 2012. An annual report on American journalism. Washington, DC: The Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• van der Wurff, R. (2012). The economics of online journalism. In E. Siapera & A. Veglis (Eds.), The handbook of global online journalism (pp. 231–250). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• WAN-IFRA. (2013). Paid digital content: The journey begins. Darmstadt: The World Association for Newspapers and News Publishers.
   Google Scholar