640
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

News website personalisation: the co-creation of content, audiences and services by online journalists and marketers

ORCID Icon
Pages 230-247 | Received 17 Aug 2018, Accepted 04 Nov 2019, Published online: 14 Nov 2019

References

  • Anderson, C. W. (2011). Between creative and quantified audiences: Web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local US newsrooms. Journalism, 12(5), 550–566.
  • Araujo, L., & Spring, M. (2006). Services, products and the institutional structure of production. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(7), 797–805.
  • Attaway-Fink, B. (2004). Market-driven journalism: Creating special sections to meet reader interests. Journal of Communication Management, 9(2), 145–154.
  • Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2009). Gatekeeping: A critical review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 1(43), 1–79.
  • Benson, R. (2002). Journalisme et marketing: L’enjeu de la diversité. Quaderni, 47(1), 85–100.
  • Bermejo, F. (2009). Audience manufacture in historical perspective: From broadcasting to Google. New Media & Society, 11(1–2), 133–154.
  • Bijker, W. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Callon, M., Méadel, C., & Rabeharisoa, V. (2002). The economy of qualities. Economy and Society, 31(2), 194–217.
  • Carlson, M. (2018). Confronting measurable journalism. Digital Journalism, 6(4), 406-417. doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1445003
  • Cestino, J., & Berndt, A. (2017). Institutional limits to service dominant logic and servitisation in innovation efforts in newspapers. Journal of Media Business Studies, 14(3), 188–216.
  • Christin, A. (2017). Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1–14.
  • Coddington, M. (2015). The wall becomes a curtain: Revisiting journalism’s news–Business boundary. In M. Carlson & S. C. Lewis (Eds.), Boundaries of journalism: Professionalism, practices and participation (pp. 67–82). London: Routledge.
  • Collet, L. (2011). La presse écrite sur le web et ses lecteurs comme limites aux techniques de personnalisation de l’information. Document Numérique, 14(3), 81–102.
  • Damian, B. (1995), Les dames du temps présent. Places et fonctions des études de marketing dans la conception des discours de la presse féminine généraliste. ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université Grenoble 3: Grenoble.
  • Deuze, M. (2003). The web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New Media & Society, 5(2), 203–230.
  • Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442–464.
  • Diakopoulos, N. (2014). Algorithmic-Accountability: The investigation of black boxes. Tow Center for Digital Journalism. Advance online publication. doi: 10.7916/D8ZK5TW2].
  • Domingo, D. (2008). Interactivity in the daily routines of online newsrooms: Dealing with an uncomfortable myth. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 680–704.
  • Evans, D. S. (2003). The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets. Yale Journal on Regulation, 20(2), 327–379.
  • Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2007). The industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms. Competition Policy International, 3(1), 151–179.
  • Evens, T., & Van Damme, K. (2016). Consumers’ willingness to share personal data: Implications for newspapers’ business models. International Journal on Media Management, 18(1), 25–41.
  • Foster, R. J. (2011). The uses of use value: Marketing, value creation, and the exigencies of consumption work. In D. Zwick & J. Cayla (Eds.), Inside marketing: Practices, ideologies, devices (pp. 42–57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gabszewicz, J., Resende, J., & Sonnac, N. (2015). Media as multi-sided platforms. In R. G. Picard & S. S. Wildman (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of the media (pp. 3–35). Cheltenham: EE Publishing.
  • Gadrey, J. (2000). The characterization of goods and services: An alternative approach. Review of Income and Wealth, 46(3), 369–387.
  • Grubenmann, S. (2016). Action research: Collaborative research for the improvement of digital journalism practice. Digital Journalism, 4(1), 160–176.
  • Guibert, G., Rebillard, F., & Rochelandet, F. (2016). Médias, culture et numérique: Approches socioéconomiques. Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Heinderyckx, F. (2015). Gatekeeping Theory Redux. In T. P. Vos & F. Heinderyckx (Eds.), Gatekeeping in transition (pp. 253–267). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Heinderyckx, F., & Vos, T. P. (2016). Reformed gatekeeping. CM: Communication and Media, 11(36), 29–46.
  • Jouët, J. (2004). Les dispositifs de construction de l’internaute par les mesures d’audience. Le Temps Des Médias, 2(3), 160–174.
  • Jouison-Laffitte, E. (2009). La recherche action: Oubliée de la recherche dans le domaine de l’entrepreneuriat. Revue De l’Entrepreneuriat, 8(1), 1–35.
  • Kessous, E., Mellet, K., & Zouinar, M. (2010). L’économie de l’attention: Entre protection des ressources cognitives et extraction de la valeur. Sociologie Du Travail, 52(3), 359–373.
  • Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29.
  • Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27(1), 28–52.
  • Kormelink, T. G., & Meijer, I. C. (2014). Tailor-made news. Meeting the demands of news users on mobile and social media. Journalism Studies, 15(5), 632–641.
  • Lewis, S. C., & Westlund, O. (2015). Big data and journalism: Epistemology, expertise, economics, and ethics. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 447–466.
  • Liu, J., Dolan, P., & Pedersen, E. R. (2010). Personalized news recommendation based on click behavior. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, Mountain View, USA: Google Inc.
  • Liu, M. (1997). La validation des connaissances au cours de la recherche-action. Etudes Et Recherches Sur Les Systèmes Agraires Et Le Développement, 30, 183–196.
  • Malcorps, S. (2017). L’entreprise de presse et son audience en ligne. Réseaux, 5(205), 145–173.
  • Méadel, C. (2010). Quantifier le public. Paris: Economica.
  • Montanola, S., & Souanef, K. (2012). Les études de lectorat et leurs discours : Entre outil de gestion, mythe journalistique et instrumentalisation. Sciences De La Société, 84–85(1), 152–169.
  • Moreira, D. A., Malcorps, S., & Vitorino, M. M. (2019). When journalists and marketers negotiate: A competency-based analysis of negotiation processes in Brazilian and Belgian media organizations. Brazilian Journalism Research, 15(2), 310–337.
  • Napoli, P. M. (2003). Audience economics: Media institutions and the audience marketplace. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Nielsen, R. K. (2016). The business of news. In (Eds), The sage handbook of digital journalism (pp. 51-67). Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Olsen, R. K., & Solvoll, M. K. (2018). Reinventing the business model for local newspapers by building walls. Journal of Media Business Studies, 15(1), 24–41.
  • Petre, C. (2015). Managing metrics: The containment, disclosure, and sanctioning of audience data at the New York Times. In The Tow Center for Digital Journalism. 1–35.
  • Petre, C. (2018). Engineering consent: How the design and marketing of newsroom analytics tools rationalize journalists’ labor. Digital Journalism, 6(4), 509–527.
  • Picard, R. G. (2006). Les médias au risque du management et du marketing. Le Temps Des Médias, 1(6), 165–174.
  • Pradié, C. (2004). L’irrésistible montée des études de marché dans la presse française (1920-1990). Le Temps Des Médias, 3(2), 126–137.
  • Rhéaume, J. (1982). La recherche-action : Un nouveau mode de savoir? Sociologie Et Sociétés, 14(1), 43–51.
  • Riemer, K., & Totz, C. (2003). The many faces of personalization. In M. M. Tseng & F. T. Piller (Eds.), The customer centric enterprise (pp. 35–50). Berlin: Springer.
  • Rouvroy, A., & Berns, T. (2013). Gouvernementalité algorithmique et perspectives d’émancipation. Réseaux, 177(1), 163–196.
  • Sackmann, S., Strüker, J., & Accorsi, R. (2006). Personalization in privacy-aware highly dynamic systems. Communications of the ACM, 49(9), 32–38.
  • Salerno, A. (2001). Une étude empirique des relations entre personnalisation, proximité dyadique et identité de clientèle. Recherche Et Applications En Marketing (French edition), 16(4), 25–46.
  • Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Shoemaker, P. J., & Riccio, J. R. (2016). Gatekeeping. In G. Mazzoleni (Eds) (Eds), The international encyclopedia of political communication (pp. pp. 2–5). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell-ICA.
  • Sonnac, N. (2013). L’écosystème des médias. Les enjeux socio-économiques d’une interaction entre deux marchés. Communication [En Ligne], 32(2), 1–40.
  • Sullivan, D. (2006). Business service model promotes better newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal, 27(4), 66–79.
  • Sundar, S. S., & Marathe, S. S. (2010). Personalization versus customization: The importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 298–322.
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic 2.0 (pp. 272). Princeton : Princeton University Press.
  • Susman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. (1978). An assessment of scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(4), 582–603.
  • Tandoc, E. C. (2014). Journalism is twerking? How web analytics is changing the process of gatekeeping. New Media & Society, 16(4), 559–575.
  • Tandoc, E. C., & Thomas, R. J. (2014). The ethics of web analytics. Digital Journalism, 3(2), 1–16.
  • Tandoc, E. C., & Vos, T. P. (2016). The journalist is marketing the news: Social media in the gatekeeping process. Journalism Practice, 10(8), 950–966.
  • Thurman, N. (2011). Making “the daily me”: Technology, economics and habit in the mainstream assimilation of personalized news. Journalism, 12(4), 395–415.
  • Thurman, N. (2015). Journalism, gatekeeping, and interactivity. In S. Coleman & D. Freelon (Eds.), A handbook of digital politics (pp. 357–374). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Thurman, N., & Schifferes, S. (2012). The future of personalization at news websites. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 775–790.
  • Tirole, J. (2016). Économie du bien commun. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Van Maanen, J. (1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 539–550.
  • Vos, T. P., & Thomas, R. J. (2019). The discursive (Re) construction of journalism’s gatekeeping role. Journalism Practice, 13(4), 396–412.
  • Vu, H. T. (2014). The online audience as gatekeeper: The influence of reader metrics on news editorial selection. Journalism, 15(8), 1094–1110.
  • Weber, F. (2015). Brève histoire de l’anthropologie. Paris: Flammarion.
  • Zelizer, B. (2009). Journalism and the Academy. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 29–41). New York, NY: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.