857
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Fluid institutional logics in digital journalism

ORCID Icon
Pages 113-131 | Received 05 Oct 2018, Accepted 28 Nov 2019, Published online: 09 Dec 2019

References

  • Achtenhagen, L. (2015). Understanding entrepreneurship in traditional media. Journal of Media Business Studies, 5(1), 123–142.
  • Achtenhagen, L., & Raviola, E. (2009). Balancing tensions during convergence: Duality management in a newspaper company. International Journal on Media Management, 11(1), 32–41.
  • Alvesson, M., Hallett, T., & Spicer, A. (2019). Uninhibited institutionalisms. Journal of Management Inquiry, 51, 105649261882277.
  • Andersson, U., & Wiik, J. (2013). Journalism meets management. Journalism Practice, 7(6), 705–719.
  • Beam, R. A. (2003). Content differences between daily newspapers with strong and weak market orientations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(2), 368–390.
  • Bex Lempert, L. (2011). Asking questions of the data: Memo writing in the grounded theory tradition. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 254–264). Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage Publ.
  • Brès, L., Raufflet, E., & Boghossian, J. (2018). Pluralism in organizations: learning from unconventional forms of organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 364–386.
  • Bro, P. (2019). Constructive journalism: proponents, precedents, and principles. Journalism, 20(4), 504–519. doi: 10.1177/1464884918770523
  • Bro, P., Hansen, K. R., & Andersson, R. (2016). Improving productivity in the newsroom? Deskilling, reskilling and multiskilling in the news media. Journalism Practice, 10(8), 1005–1018. doi:10.1080/17512786.2015.1090883
  • Burrowes, C. P. (2011). Property, power and press freedom: Emergence of the fourth estate, 1640–1789. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 13(1), 2–66.
  • Carlson, M. (2016). Order versus access: News search engines and the challenge to traditional journalistic roles. Media, Culture & Society, 29(6), 1014–1030.
  • Carlson, M., & Usher, N. (2016). News startups as agents of innovation. Digital Journalism, 4(5), 563–581.
  • Cherubini, F., & Nielsen, R. K. (2016). Editorial analytics: How news media are developing and using audience data and metrics. Retrieved from http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/publications/2016/editorial-analytics-2016/
  • Chua, S., & Westlund, O. (2019). Audience-centric engagement, collaboration culture and platform counterbalancing: A longitudinal study of ongoing sensemaking of emerging technologies. Media and Communication, 7(1), 153.
  • Coates Nee, R. (2014). Social responsibility theory and the digital nonprofits: Should the government aid online news startups? Journalism, 15(3), 326–343.
  • Cornia, A., Sehl, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). ‘We no longer live in a time of separation’: A comparative analysis of how editorial and commercial integration became a norm. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 22(2), 146488491877991.
  • Dennis, E. E., Warley, S., & Sheridan, J. (2006). Doing digital: An assessment of the Top 25 U.S. Media companies and their digital strategies. Journal of Media Business Studies, 3(1), 33–51.
  • Deuze, M. (2003). The web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New Media & Society, 5(2), 203–230.
  • Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442–464.
  • DeVito, M. A. (2017). From editors to algorithms. Digital Journalism, 5(6), 753–773.
  • Duffy, A. (2019). Out of the shadows: The editor as a defining characteristic of journalism. Journalism, 11(3), 146488491982681.
  • Ekdale, B., Singer, J. B., Tully, M., & Harmsen, S. (2015). Making change: Diffusion of technological, relational, and cultural innovation in the newsroom. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(4), 938–958.
  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back In: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gilbert, C. G. (2005). Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 741–763.
  • Gilbert, C. G. (2006). Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist? Organization Science, 17(1), 150–167.
  • Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergences vs forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  • Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371.
  • Haigh, N., & Hoffman, A. J. (2012). Hybrid organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 126–134.
  • Hamilton, J. T. (2004). All the news that’s fit to sell: How the market transforms information into news. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hanitzsch, T. (2007). Deconstructing journalism culture: Toward a Universal theory. Communication Theory, 17(4), 367–385.
  • Hanitzsch, T., & Vos, T. P. (2017). Journalistic roles and the struggle over institutional identity: The discursive constitution of journalism. Communication Theory, 27(2), 115–135.
  • Hanusch, F. (2017). Web analytics and the functional differentiation of journalism cultures: Individual, organizational and platform-specific influences on newswork. Information, Communication & Society, 20(10), 1571–1586.
  • Healey, K., & Woods, R. H. (2017). Processing is not judgment, storage is not memory: A critique of Silicon Valley’s moral catechism. Journal of Media Ethics, 32(1), 2–15.
  • Hedman, U., & Djerf-Pierre, M. (2013). The social journalist: Embracing the social media life or creating a new digital divide? Digital Journalism, 1(3), 368–385.
  • Holton, J. A. (2011). The coding process and its challenges. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 265–289). Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage Publ.
  • Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
  • Kosterich, A. (2019). Managing news nerds: Strategizing about institutional change in the news industry. Journal of Media Business Studies, 78(2), 1–18.
  • Küng, L. (2015). Innovators in digital news. London, New York: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd in association with the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.
  • Küng, L. (2017). Going digital: A roadmap for organisational transformation. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/going-digital-roadmap-organisational-transformation
  • Larrondo, A., Domingo, D., Erdal, I. J., Masip, P., & van den Bulck, H. (2016). Opportunities and limitations of newsroom convergence. Journalism Studies, 17(3), 277–300.
  • Lischka, J. A. (2015). How structural multi-platform newsroom features and innovative values alter journalistic cross-channel and cross-sectional working procedures. Journal of Media Business Studies, 12(1), 7–28.
  • Lischka, J. A. (2018). Logics in social media news making: How social media editors marry the Facebook logic with journalistic standards. Journalism, 146488491878847. doi:10.1177/1464884918788472
  • Lischka, J. A. (2019a). A badge of honor? How the New York Times discredits President Trump’s fake news accusations. Journalism Studies, 20(2), 287–304.
  • Lischka, J. A. (2019b). Strategic renewal during technology change: Tracking the digital journey of legacy news companies. Journal of Media Business Studies, 20(2), 1–20.
  • Lischka, J. A. (2019c). Strategic communication as discursive institutional work: a critical discourse analysis of mark zuckerberg’s legitimacy talk at the european parliament. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(3), 197–213. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2019.1613661
  • Lowrey, W., & Erzikova, E. (2014). Shifting institutional orders and responses to technological disruption among local journalists in Russia and the U.S. International Communication Gazette, 76(7), 552–574.
  • McChesney, R. W. (2000). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times (Publ. in paperback). New York NY: The New Press.
  • McManus, J. H. (1992a). Serving the public and serving the market: A conflict of interest? Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 7(4), 196–208.
  • McManus, J. H. (1992b). What kind of commodity is news? Communication Research, 19(6), 787–805.
  • McManus, J. H. (2009). The commercialization of news. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 218–235). New York: Routledge.
  • Møller Hartley, J. (2013). The online journalist between ideals and audiences: Towards a (more) audience-driven and source-detached journalism? Journalism Practice, 7(5), 572–587.
  • Nee Coates, R. (2013). Creative destruction: An exploratory study of how digitally native news nonprofits are innovating online journalism practices. International Journal on Media Management, 15(1), 3–22.
  • Nelson, J. L., & Tandoc, E. C., Jr. (2018). Doing “well” or doing “good”: What audience analytics reveal about journalism’s competing goals. Journalism Studies, 5(1), 1–17. 10.1080/1461670X.2018.1547122
  • Neuberger, C., Langenohl, S., & Nuernbergk, C. (2014). Social media und journalismus. LfM-Dokumentation: Vol. 50. Düsseldorf: Landesanst. für Medien Nordrhein-Westfalen (LfM).
  • Nicolini, D., Delmestri, G., Goodrick, E., Reay, T., Lindberg, K., & Adolfsson, P. (2016). Look what’s back! Institutional complexity, reversibility and the knotting of logics. British Journal of Management, 27(2), 228–248.
  • Nielsen, R. K., & Ganter, S. A. (2017). Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1600–1617.
  • Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001.
  • Peters, C., & Carlson, M. (2019). Conceptualizing change in journalism studies: Why change at all? Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 20(5), 637–641. doi:10.1177/1464884918760674
  • Picard, R. G. (2003). Cash cows or entrecôte: Publishing companies and disruptive technologies. Trends in Communication, 11(2), 127.
  • Picard, R. G. (2010). A business perspective on challenges facing journalism. In D. A. L. Levy & R. K. Nielsen (Eds.), The changing business of journalism and its implications for democracy (pp. 17–24). Oxford: University of Oxford, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
  • Ponte, D., Pesci, C., & Camussone, P. F. (2017). Between mission and revenue: Measuring performance in a hybrid organization. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(2), 196–214.
  • Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18–42.
  • Raviola, E., & Hartmann, B. (2015). Business perspectives on work in news organizations. Journal of Media Business Studies, 6(1), 7–36.
  • Robinson, S. (2011). Convergence crises: News work and news space in the digitally transforming newsroom. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1122–1141.
  • Ruotsalainen, J. (2018). Scanning the shape of journalism—Emerging trends, changing culture? Futures, 104, 14–24.
  • Russell, F. M. (2019). The new gatekeepers: an institutional-level view of silicon valley and the disruption of journalism. Journalism Studies, 20(5), 631–648. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2017.1412806
  • Ryfe, D. M. (2009). Broader and deeper: A study of newsroom culture in a time of change. Journalism, 10(2), 197–216.
  • Scacco, J., Curry, A. L., & Stroud, N. J. (2015). Digital divisions: Organizational gatekeeping practices in the context of online news. #ISOJ, 5(1), 106–123. Retrieved from: https://isojjournal.wordpress.com/2015/04/15/digital-divisions-organizational-gatekeeping-practices-in-the-context-of-online-news/
  • Schudson, M. (1989). The sociology of news production. Media, Culture & Society, 11(3), 263–282.
  • Schultz, J. (1998). Reviving the fourth estate: Democracy, accountability, and the media. Reshaping Australian institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511597138
  • Schultze, Q. J. (2004). Habits of the high-tech heart: Living virtuously in the information age. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books.
  • Singer, J. B. (2003). Who are these guys? The online challenge to the notion of journalistic professionalism. Journalism, 4, 139–163.
  • Strauss, A. L. (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Tandoc, E. C., & Ferrucci, P. (2014). A tale of two newsrooms: How market orientation influences web analytics use. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/8264434/A_tale_of_two_newsrooms_How_market_orientation_influences_web_analytics_use
  • Tandoc, E. C., & Foo, C. Y. W. (2018). Here’s What BuzzFeed journalists think of their journalism. Digital Journalism, 6(1), 41–57.
  • Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100.
  • Tewksbury, D. (2005). The seeds of audience fragmentation: Specialization in the use of online news sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(3), 332–348.
  • Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Vos, T. P., & Singer, J. B. (2016). Media discourse about entrepreneurial journalism. Journalism Practice, 10(2), 143–159.
  • Waeger, D., & Weber, K. (2019). Institutional complexity and organizational change: An open polity perspective. Academy of Management Review, 44(2), 336–359.
  • Wagemans, A., Witschge, T., & Deuze, M. (2016). Ideology as resource in entrepreneurial journalism: The French online news startup Mediapart. Journalism Practice, 10(2), 160–177.
  • Wagemans, A., Witschge, T., & Harbers, F. (2019). Impact as driving force of journalistic and social change. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 20(4), 552–567. doi:10.1177/1464884918770538
  • Wallace, J. (2018). Modelling contemporary gatekeeping. Digital Journalism, 6(3), 274–293.
  • Wallace, S. (2013). The complexities of convergence: Multiskilled journalists working in BBC regional multimedia newsrooms. International Communication Gazette, 75(1), 99–117.
  • Wasike, B. S. (2013). Framing news in 140 characters: How social media editors frame the news and interact with audiences via Twitter. Global Media Journal: Canadian Edition, 6(1), 5–23.
  • Webster, J. G., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012). The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 39–56.
  • Welbers, K., van Atteveldt, W., Kleinnijenhuis, J., Ruigrok, N., & Schaper, J. (2016). News selection criteria in the digital age: Professional norms versus online audience metrics. Journalism, 17(8), 1037–1053.
  • Willnat, L., & Weaver, D. H. (2018). Social media and U.S. Journalists. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 889–909.
  • Wu, T. (2016). The attention merchants: The epic scramble to get inside our heads (First edition). A Borzoi book. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Zamith, R. (2018). Quantified audiences in news production. Digital Journalism, 6(4), 418–435.
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for the future at the new frontier of power. London: Profile Books.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.