Principles of justice and the idea of practice-dependence

References

• Abizadeh, A. 2008. “Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders.” Political Theory 36: 37–65. doi:10.1177/0090591707310090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwood, M. 1985. The Handmaid’s Tale. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
   Google Scholar
• Brännmark, J. 2016. “Moral Disunitarianism.” Philosophical Quarterly 66: 481–499. doi:10.1093/pq/pqv114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännmark, J. 2019. “Institutions, Ideology, and Nonideal Social Ontology.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 49: 137–159. doi:10.1177/0048393118823265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännmark, J., and E. Brandstedt. 2019. “Rawlsian Constructivism and the Assumption of Disunity.” Journal of Political Philosophy 27: 48–66. doi:10.1111/jopp.12157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carens, J. 2013. The Ethics of Immigration. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 1986. Law’s Empire. London: Fontana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, E., and N. Möller. 2016. “What Distinguishes the Practice-Dependent Approach to Justice?” Philosophy & Social Criticism 42: 3–23. doi:10.1177/0191453715580475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, E., and N. Möller. 2019. “How Practices Do Not Matter.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22: 103–118. doi:10.1080/13698230.2017.1403130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, S. M. 2009. “A Contract on Future Generations?” In Intergenerational Justice, edited by A. Gosseries and L. H. Meyer, 77–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, A. 2005. “Constructing Justice for Existing Practice: Rawls and the Status Quo.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 33: 281–316. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00034.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, A. 2012. Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for A Global Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jubb, R. 2016. “Recover It from the Facts as We Know Them.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 13: 77–99. doi:10.1163/17455243-4681059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, C. 2017. Justice and Reconciliation in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meckled-Garcia, S. 2013. “The Practice-Dependence Red Herring and Better Reasons for Restricting the Scope of Justice.” Raisons Politiques 51: 97–120. doi:10.3917/rai.051.0097.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 2007. National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 2013. Justice for Earthlings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 2016. Strangers in Our Midst: The Political Philosophy of Immigration. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postema, G. J. 1987. “‘Protestant’ Interpretation and Social Practices.” Law and Philosophy 6: 283–319. doi: 10.2307/3504600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1955. “Two Concepts of Rules.” Philosophical Review 64: 3–32. doi:10.2307/2182230.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1989. “The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus.” New York University Law Review 64: 233–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1999a. A Theory of Justice. Rev ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1999b. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reglitz, M. 2016. “The Practice-Independence of Intergenerational Justice.” Utilitas 28: 415–440. doi:10.1017/S095382081600008X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reglitz, M. 2017. “Fairness to Non-Participants: A Case for A Practice-Independent Egalitarian Baseline.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20: 466–485. doi:10.1080/13698230.2015.1037575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronzoni, M. 2012. “Life Is Not a Camping Trip: On the Desirability of Cohenite Socialism.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11: 171–185. doi:10.1177/1470594X11417239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangiovanni, A. 2007. “Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 35: 3–39. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00097.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangiovanni, A. 2008. “Justice and the Priority of Politics to Morality.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 16: 137–164. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00291.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangiovanni, A. 2016. “How Practices Matter.” Journal of Political Philosophy 24: 3–23. doi:10.1111/jopp.12056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, J. J. C. 1973. An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics.”In Utilitarianism: For and Against, by J.J.C. Smart and B. Williams, 3–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tasioulas, J. 2007. “The Moral Reality of Human Rights.” In Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor? edited by T. Pogge, 75–101. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valentini, L. 2011. “Global Justice and Practice-Dependence: Conventionalism, Institutionalism, Functionalism.” Journal of Political Philosophy 19: 399–418. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00373.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar