The function of solidarity and its normative implications

References

• Alexander, J. 2014. “Morality as a Cultural System: On Solidarity Civil and Uncivil.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity, edition, 303–310. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137391865_13.
   Google Scholar
• Banting, K., and W. Kymlicka, eds. 2017. The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bayertz, K. 1999. Solidarity. Dordrecht, Netherlands, Boston, USA and London, UK: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Beer de, P., and F. Koster. 2009. Sticking Together or Falling Apart?: Solidarity in an Era of Individualization and Globalization. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, S. 2006. The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe’s Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, S. 2021. “The Causes of Populism in the West.” Annual Review of Political Science 24 (1): 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102503.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, L. 2007. “Three Kinds of Race-Related Solidarity.” Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (1): 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00366.x.
   Google Scholar
• Brunkhorst, H. 2005. Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burelli, C. 2018. “Solidarity, Stability and Enlightened Self-Interest in the EU.” Social Policies 3 (2018): 449–464. https://doi.org/10.7389/91923.
   Google Scholar
• Burelli, C. 2020. “Political Normativity and the Functional Autonomy of Politics.” European Journal of Political Theory 21 (4): 627–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885120918500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceva, E., and M. P. Ferretti. 2021. “An Ethics of Office Accountability for Well-Functioning Public Institutions.” Public Affairs Quarterly 35 (4): 277–296.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L. 1977. “Equality, Solidarity, and Rawls’ Maximin.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 6 (3): 262–266. Accessed July 31, 2023. JSTOR http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P. S. 2003. Norms of Nature: Naturalism and the Nature of Functions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1984. The Division of Labour in Society. edited by. C Lewis tran. WD Halls, London: The Macmillan Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17729-5.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 2013. The Division of Labour in Society , edited by S Lukes. London, UK and NY, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. 1979. A Framework for Political Analysis. University of Chicago Press. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:621524.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 1982. “Marxism, Functionalism, and Game Theory: A Case for Methodological Individualism.” Theory and Society 11 (4): 483–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 1994. “Functional Explanation: In Social Science.” In Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, edited by M. Martin and M. LC, 403–414. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, E. 2020. “A Function-Sensitive Approach to the Political Legitimacy of Global Governance.” British Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 1001–1024. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, E., and N. Möller. forthcoming. “The Problem of Political Normativity Understood as Functional Normativity.” Journal of Philosophical Research. https://philpapers.org/rec/EVATPO-26.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M. 2005. The Boundaries of Welfare: European Integration and the New Spatial Politics of Social Protection. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199284660.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M. 2014. “Solidarity in Europe After the Crisis.” Constellations 21 (2): 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12091.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M. 2017a. “The European Social Union: A Missing but Necessary “Political Good.” In A European Social Union After the Crisis, edited by F. Vandenbroucke, C. Barnard, and G. Baere. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235174.003.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M. 2017b. “The Stein Rokkan Lecture 2016 Mission Impossible? Reconciling Economic and Social Europe After the Euro Crisis and Brexit.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M., and C. Burelli. 2019. “Cross-National Solidarity and Political Sustainability in the EU After the Crisis.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (1): 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flora, P., and A. J. Heidenheimer. 2009. The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. New Brunswick, USA and London, UK: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., and M. Jachtenfuchs. 2021. “Postfunctionalism Reversed: Solidarity and Rebordering During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of European Public Policy 28 (3): 350–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1881588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2013. “Democracy, Solidarity and the European Crisis.” Roadmap to a Social Europe 4:4–13. Social Europe Report.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2015. The Lure of Technocracy. Cambridge, Malden, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halmwood, J. 2008. “Functionalism.“ The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology, edited by Bryan S. Turner, 218–2020. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardcastle, V. G. 2002. “On the Normativity of Functions.” In Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology, edited by A. Ariew, R. Cummins, and M. Perlman, 144–156. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyd, D. 2015. “Solidarity: A Local, Partial and Reflective Emotion.” Diametros 43:55–64. https://pluto.huji.ac.il/~msheyd/files/Solidarity_health.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2009. “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hufendiek, R., D. James, and R. R. van. 2020. “Introduction.” In Social Functions in Philosophy: Metaphysical, Normative, and Methodological Perspectives, R. Hufendiek, D. James, and R. R. van. edited by, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429435393.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. S. 2007. “Functionalism of Mind and Functionalism of Society: The Concept of Conscience and Durkheim’s Division of Social Labour.” Durkheimian Studies 13 (1): 85–104. Berghahn Journals. https://doi.org/10.3167/ds.2007.130104.
   Google Scholar
• Kapeller, J., and F. Wolkenstein. 2013. “The Grounds of Solidarity: From Liberty to Loyalty.” European Journal of Social Theory 16 (4): 476–491. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431013479689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolers, A. 2016. A Moral Theory of Solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, A., and A. B. Pessi. 2014. Solidarity: Theory and Practice. New York: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Leroux, P. 1840. De l’humanité: de son principe, et de son avenir, où. se trouve exposée la vraie définition de la religion et où l’on explique le sens, la suite, et l’enchaînement du Mosaisme et du Christianisme. Première partie. Paris (FR): Perrotin.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J. T. 2017. “Against Fraternity.” In The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, edited by K. Banting and W. Kymlicka, 1st. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795452.003.0004.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. 1971. Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work, a Historical and Critical Study. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. 1999. “Solidarity and Citizenship.” In Solidarity. Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture, edited by K. Bayertz, 273–279. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9245-1_14.
   Google Scholar
• Mahner, M., and M. Bunge. 2001. “Function and Functionalism: A Synthetic Perspective.” Philosophy of Science 68 (1): 75–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. H. 1949. “Citizenship and Social Class.” In The Welfare State Reader, edited by T. Marshall, 71–134. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, P. 2001. What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498510.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. G. 1989. “In Defense of Proper Functions.” Philosophy of Science 56 (2): 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1086/289488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, S., and S. Keil. 2013. “The Territoriality of Fiscal Solidarity: Comparing Swiss Equalisation with European Union Structural Funding.” Perspectives on Federalism 5 (1): 122–148.
   Google Scholar
• Neander, K. 1999. “Fitness and the Fate of Unicorns.“ In Where Biology Meets Psychology: Philosophical Essays, edited byValerie G. Hardcastle, 3–26. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parijs, P. V. 2004. Cultural Diversity versus Economic Solidarity: Is There a Tension? How Must It Be Resolved. Bruxelles, Belgium: De Boeck.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1991. The Social System. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. 2007. “Resilience as the Explanandum of Social Theory.” In Political Contingency: Studying the Unexpected, the Accidental, and the Unforeseen, edited by I. Shapiro and S. Bedi, 79–96. NY, USA and London, UK: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814708828.003.0006.
   Google Scholar
• Piasentier, M. 2020. “As the Blowing of the Wind. Biological Functions and Natural Selection.” In Biopolitics: Between Nature and Language, 87–104. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351067539-6.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, W. 1975. “Durkheim as a Functionalist.” The Sociological Quarterly 16 (3): 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1975.tb00954.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prainsack, B. 2020. “Solidarity in Times of Pandemics.” Democratic Theory 7 (2): 124–133. Berghahn Journals. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2020.070215.
   Google Scholar
• Queloz, M. 2020. “Revealing Social Functions Through Pragmatic Genealogies.” In Social Functions in Philosophy, 200–218. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. 2017. “Solidarity, Diversity and the Quality of Government.” In The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, 1st edited by, K. Banting and W. Kymlicka, 300–326. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795452.003.0011.
   Google Scholar
• Salmela, M. 2014. “Collective Emotions as ‘The Glue’ of Group Solidarity.“ In Solidarity: Theory and Practice, edited by Laitinen, A., and Birgitta Pessi, A., 48–70. Lanham, USA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sangiovanni, A. 2015. “Solidarity as Joint Action.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (4): 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiermer, B. 2014. “Durkheim’s Concept of Mechanical Solidarity: Where Did It Go?” Durkheimian Studies 20 (1): 64–88. Berghahn Journals. https://doi.org/10.3167/ds.2014.200104.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, S. J. 2015. “Seeking Solidarity.” Philosophy Compass 10 (10): 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, M. 2009. “Means-End Coherence, Stringency, and Subjective Reasons.” Philosophical Studies 143 (2): 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9200-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Shelby, T. 2002. “Foundations of Black Solidarity: Collective Identity or Common Oppression?” Ethics 112 (2): 231–266. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/340276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stjernø, S. 2009. Solidarity in Europe: The History of an Idea. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tava, F. 2021. “Justice, Emotions, and Solidarity.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (1): 39–55. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2021.1893251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. E. 2015. “Solidarity: Obligations and Expressions.” Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (2): 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thijssen, P. 2012. “From Mechanical to Organic Solidarity, and Back: With Honneth Beyond Durkheim.” European Journal of Social Theory 15 (4): 454–470. London: Sage Publications UK. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011423589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. J. 2015. Normativity. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomela, R. 2013. Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group Agents. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turchin, P. 2010. “Warfare and the Evolution of Social Complexity: A Multilevel-Selection Approach.” Structure and Dynamics 4 (3). https://doi.org/10.5070/SD943003313.
   Google Scholar
• van, R. R. 2020. “In Search of the Missing Mechanism. Functional Explanation in Social Science.” In Social Functions in Philosophy, 70–92. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke, F. 2020. Solidarity Through Redistribution and Insurance of Incomes: The EU as Support, Guide, Guarantor or Provider? Amsterdam Centre for European Studies Research Paper ( 2020/01).
   Google Scholar
• Van Parijs, P. 2017. “Concluding Reflections: Solidarity, Diversity, and Social Justice.” In The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, 1st edited by, K. Banting and W. Kymlicka, 420–426. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795452.003.0015.
   Google Scholar
• Voland, E. 1999. “On the Nature of Solidarity.” In Solidarity. Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture, edited by K. Bayertz, 157–172. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9245-1_8.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1950. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, edited by RH Tawney tran T Parsons. New York: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, L. 1976. Teleological Explanations. 1st ed. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520333697.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. 2022. “How Non-Majoritarian Institutions Make Silent Majorities Vocal: A Political Explanation of Authoritarian Populism.” Perspectives on Politics 20 (3): 788–807. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721001043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar