‘You’re disabled, why did you have sex in the first place?’ An intersectional analysis of experiences of disabled women with regard to their sexual and reproductive health and rights in Gujarat State, India

References

• World Health Organisation. World report on disability. 2011 [ cited 2016 Aug 23].
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen TTA, Liamputtong P, Monfries M. Reproductive and sexual health of people with physical disabilities: a metasynthesis. Sex Disabil. 2016;34:30–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmail S, Darry K, Walter A, et al. Attitudes and perceptions towards disability and sexuality. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:1148–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek MA, Young ME, Rintala DH, et al. Barriers to reproductive health maintenance among women with physical disabilities. J Women’s Health. 1995;4:505–518.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek MA, Young ME, Rintala DH, et al. Sexuality issues among women with physical disabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1997;34:224–225.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. United Nations enable, standard rules on the equalisation of opportunities for persons with disabilities. 2006 [ cited 2016 Aug 23]. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/dissre00.htm
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Promoting sexual and reproductive health for persons with disabilities. 2009 [ cited 2016 Aug 23]. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/srh_for_disabilities.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Singh A, Suri V, et al. Barriers faced by women with disabilities in access to sexual and reproductive healthcare: experiences from North India. Int J Preven Curat Comm Med. 2015;1:69–73 ​.
   Google Scholar
• Ahumuza SE, Matovu JKB, Ddamulira JB, et al. Challenges in accessing sexual and reproductive health services by people with physical disabilities in Kampala, Uganda. Reprod Health. 2014;11:59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassa TA, Luck T, Bekele A, et al. Sexual and reproductive health of young people with disability in Ethiopia: a study on knowledge, attitude and practice: a cross-sectional study. Global Health. 2016;12:5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavuso SS, Maharaj P. Access to sexual and reproductive health services: experiences and perspectives of persons with disabilities in Durban, South Africa. Agenda. 2015;29:79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan C, Zayas J, Devine A, et al. W-DARE: a three-year program of participatory action research to improve the sexual and reproductive health of women with disabilities in the Philippines. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harriss-White B. On to a loser: disability in India. In: Harriss-White B, Subramanian S, editors. Illfare in India, essays on India’s social sector in honour of S Guhan. New Delhi: Sage Publications; 1999. p. 135–159.
   Google Scholar
• Ghai A. Marginalisation and disability: experiences from the third world. In: Priestly M, editor. Disability and the life course, global perspectives. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley E, Walmsley J, Earle S, et al. ‘The silence is roaring’: sterilization, reproductive rights and women with intellectual disabilities. Disabil Soc. 2012;27:413–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PARAY. Hysterectomy in the mentally handicapped. Indian J Med Ethics. 1994;2:6–7. ​
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Disability and the millennium development goals. 2011 [ cited 2016 Aug 23]. Available from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/review_of_disability_and_the_mdgs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tolhurst R, Leach B, Price J, et al. Intersectionality and gender mainstreaming in international health: using a feminist participatory action research process to analyse voices and debates from the global south and north. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1825–1832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhamoon, R. and Hankivsky, O. Why the theory and practice of intersectionality matter to health research and policy. In: Hankivksy O, de Leeuw S, Bilkis Vissandjée JL, and Khanlou N. ​, editors. Health inequalities: intersectional frameworks and practices. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Larson E, George A, Morgan R, et al. 10 best resources on… intersectionality with an emphasis on low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31:964–969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen A, Jensen SQ. Doing intersectional analysis: methodological implications for qualitative research. Nordic J Feminist Gend Res. 2012;20:109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Doyal L. Challenges in researching life with HIV/AIDS: an intersectional analysis of black African migrants in London. Cult Health Sex. 2009;11:173–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell R. Gender, health and theory: conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1675–1683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankivsky O. Women’s health, men’s health and gender and health: implications of intersectionality. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1712–1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins PH. Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annu Rev Sociol. 2015;41:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Registrar General Census Commissioner, India. Census of India 2011, data on disability [Internet]. 2013 [ cited 2016 Aug 23]. Available from: http://www.disabilityaffairs.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/disabilityinindia2011data.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chander J. Disability rights and the emergence of disability studies. In: Addlakha R, editor. Disability studies in India, global discourses, local realities. New Delhi: Routledge; 2013. p. 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna R, Mehta B, Chopra N, et al. Consultative meet to design a perspective building workshop on gender and disability, report on the proceedings. Vadodara: Women’s Health Training Research and Advocacy Cell (WOHTRAC); 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Rohwerder B. Disability inclusion: topic guide. Birmingham (UK): Governance and Social Development Resource Centre (GSDRC), University of Birmingham; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Groce NE, Kett M, Lang R, et al. Disability and poverty: the need for a more nuanced understanding of implications for development policy and practice. Third World Q. 2011;32:1493–1513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghai A. Disabled women: an excluded agenda of Indian feminism. Hypatia. 2002;17:49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Al Ju’Beh K Disability inclusive development toolkit. 2015 [ cited 2016 Aug 16]. Available from: http://www.cbm.org/article/downloads/54741/CBM-DID-TOOLKIT-accessible.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oliver M. The social model in action. In: Barnes C, Mercer G, editors. Implementing the social model of disability: theory and research. Leeds: The Disability Press; 2004. p. 18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Miles M. Disability in an eastern religious context: historical perspectives. Disabil Soc. 1995;10:49–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra S. The capability approach and disability. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2006;16:236–247.
   Google Scholar
• Vaidya S. Women with disability and reproductive rights: deconstructing discourses. Soc Change. 2015;45:517–533.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Sharma V. Sexual knowledge and practices of college girls in rural Gujarat, India. J Fam Welfare. 1996;42:19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell JC, Caldwell P, Caldwell BK, et al. The construction of adolescence in a changing world: implications for sexuality, reproduction and marriage. Stud Fam Plann. 1998;29:137–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta B, Misra G. Advocacy for sexual and reproductive health: the challenge in India. Reprod Health Matters. 2000;8:24–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin A, Bentley ME. The influence of gender on rural women’s illness experiences and health seeking strategies for gynaecological symptoms. J Health Manag. 2002;4:230–249.
   Google Scholar
• Bhanderi MN, Kannan S. Untreated reproductive morbidities among ever married women of slums of Rajkot city, Gujarat: the role of class, distance, provider attitudes and perceived quality of care. J Urban Health. 2010;87:254–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peta C, McKenzie J, Kathard H, et al. We are not asexual beings: disabled women in Zimbabwe talk about their active sexuality. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2016; doi:10.1007/s13178-016-0266-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price J, Shildrick M. Bodies together: touch, ethics and disability. In: Corker M, Shakespeare T, editors. Disability/postmodernism: embodying disability theory. London: Continuum; 2001. p. 62–76.
   Google Scholar
• Rembis MA. Beyond the binary: rethinking the social model of disabled sexuality. Sex Disabil. 2009;28:51–60. ​
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addlakha R. How young people with disabilities conceptualise the body, sex and marriage in urban India: four case studies. Sex Disabil. 2007;25:111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scambler G. Health-related Stigma. Sociol Health Illn. 2009;31:441–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T. Researching disabled sexuality. In: Barnes C, Mercer G, editors. Doing disability research. Leeds: The Disability Press; 1997. p. 177–189.
   Google Scholar
• Baum F. Researching public health: behind the qualitative-quantitative methodological debate. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40:459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J. The application of qualitative methods to social research. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publication; 2003. p. 24–46.
   Google Scholar
• Pousada García TP, Madrid Martínez P, Pereira Loureiro J, et al. Influence of disability on maternal care. Sex Disabil. 2015;33:469–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demographic Health Survey. India National Family Health Survey 2005-06. 2007 [ cited 2016 Aug 23]. Available from: http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FRIND3/FRIND3-Vol1andVol2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Lewis J, Elam G. Designing and selecting samples. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publication; 2003. p. 77–108.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono T. Ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disability as participants in research. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2006;31:173–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron L, Murphy J. Obtaining consent to participate in research: the issues involved in including people with a range of learning and communication disabilities. Br J Learn Disabil. 2007;35:113–120.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer L, Ritchie J, O’Connor W. Analysis: practices and principles and processes. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publication; 2003. p. 199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena D, Vangani R, Mavalankar DV, et al. Inequity in maternal health care service utilization in Gujarat: analyses of district-level health survey data. Global Health Action. 2013;6:19652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestly M. Disability and the life course, global perspectives. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh J. Participation, inclusion and the law: moving beyond the rhetoric. In: Addlakha R, editor. Disability studies in India, global discourses, local realities. New Delhi: Routledge; 2013. p. 414–422.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank-Human Development Unit South Asia Region. People with disabilities in India: from commitments to outcome. 2007 [ cited 2016 Aug 23]. Available from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/577801468259486686/pdf/502090WP0Peopl1Box0342042B01PUBLIC1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Raturi R. Disabling, crippling, turning rights lame. Combat Law. 2008;7:6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hans A, Patel AM, Agnihotri SB. The need for a framework for combined disability and gender budgeting. Indian J Gend Stud. 2008;15:233–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlton JI. Nothing about us without us, disability, oppression, and empowerment. London: University of California Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty CT. Under western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary. 1984;12:333–358.
   Google Scholar
• Parekh PN. Gender disability and the postcolonial nexus. Wagadu. 2007;4:143–161.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. 1986. In: Szeman I, Kaposy T, editors. Cultural theory, an anthology. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. p. 81–93. ​
   Google Scholar
• Moser CON. Gender planning in the third world: meeting practical and strategic gender needs. World Dev. 1989;17:1799–1825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis N. What is ‘transversal politics’? Soundings. 1999;12:94–98.
   Google Scholar