2,368
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Physical partner violence, women’s economic status and help-seeking behaviour in Dar es Salaam and Mbeya, Tanzania

&
Article: 1290426 | Received 27 Jun 2016, Accepted 30 Jan 2017, Published online: 09 May 2017

References

  • Heise LL, Garcia-Moreno C. Violence by intimate partners. In: Krug E, Dahlberg L, Mercy J, et al., editors. World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
  • Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HAFM, Ellsberg MC, et al. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet. 2006;368:1260–10.
  • Campbell J. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet. 2002;359:1331–1336.
  • Ellsberg M, Jansen H, Heise L, et al. Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: an observational study. Lancet. 2008;371:1165–1172.
  • Heise LL, Pitanguy J, Germain A. Violence against women: the hidden health burden. Washington (DC): World Bank; 1994.
  • Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HAFM, Ellsberg MC, et al. WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
  • Graham DLR, Rawlings E, Rimini N. Survivors of terror: battered women, hostages and the Stockholm syndrome. In: Yllo K, Bograd M, editors. Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Newbury Park, (CA): Sage; 1990. p. 217–233.
  • Rusbult CE, Martz JM. Remaining in an abusive relationship: an investment model analysis of non-voluntary dependence. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1999;21:558–571.
  • Strube MJ, Barbour LS. The decision to leave an abusive relationship: economic dependence and psychological commitment. J Marriage Fam. 1983;45:785–793.
  • Djikanovic B, Wong SLF, Jansen HAFM, et al. Help-seeking behaviour of women who experienced intimate partner violence: a cross-sectional study conducted in Belgrade, Serbia. Fam Pract. 2012;29:189–195.
  • Ellsberg MC, Winkvist A, Pena R, et al. Women’s strategic responses to violence in Nicaragua. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55:547–555.
  • Ergöçmen BA, Yüksel-Kaptanoğlu İ, Jansen HA. Intimate partner violence and the relation between help-seeking behavior and the severity and frequency of physical violence among women in Turkey. Violence against Women. 2013;19:1151–1174.
  • Gelles RJ. Abused wife: why do they stay? J Marriage Fam. 1976;38:659–668.
  • Naved RT, Azim S, Bhuiya A, et al. Physical violence by husbands: magnitude, disclosure and help-seeking behavior of women in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2917–2929.
  • Brandwein RA. Battered women, children, and welfare reform: the ties that bind. Thousand Oaks, (CA): Sage; 1999.
  • Davis M. The economics of abuse: how violence perpetuates women’s poverty. In: Brandwein RA, editor. Battered women, children, and welfare reform: the ties that bind. Thousand Oaks, (CA): Sage; 1999. p. 17–30.
  • Kalmuss DS, Straus MA. Wife’s marital dependency and wife abuse. J Marriage Fam. 1982;44:277–286.
  • Nussbaum MC. Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
  • Sen A. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
  • Sen AK. Gender and cooperative conflicts. In: Tinker I, editor. Persistent inequalities: women and world development. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990.
  • Kantor KG, Straus MA. Response of victims and the police to assaults on wives. In: Straus MA, Gelles RJ, editors. Physical violence in American families: risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick (N.J): Transaction; 1990.
  • Agarwal B. “Bargaining” and gender relations: within and beyond the household. Fem Econ. 1997;3:1–51.
  • Kabeer N. Women, wages and intra-household power relations in urban Bangladesh. Dev Change. 1997;28:261–302.
  • Katz E. The intra-household economics of voice and exit. Fem Econ. 1997;3:25–46.
  • Sen P. Enhancing women’s choices in responding to domestic violence in Calcutta: a comparison of employment and education. Eur J Dev Res. 1999;11:65–86.
  • Standing H. Dependence and autonomy: women’s employment and the family in Calcutta. London: Routledge; 1991.
  • Dutton MA. Battered women’s strategic response to violence: the role of context. In: Edelson JL, Eisikovis ZC, editors. Future interventions with battered women and their families. London: Sage; 1996.
  • Kirkwood C. Leaving abusive partners: from the scars of survival to the wisdom of change. 1st ed. London: Sage; 1993.
  • Farmer A, Tiefenthaler J. Domestic violence: the value of sevices as signals. Am Econ Rev. 1996;86:274–279.
  • Fawole OI, Aderonmu AL, Fawole AO. Intimate partner abuse: wife beating among civil servants in Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2005;9:54–64.
  • Hayati EN, Eriksson M, Hakimi M, et al. ‘Elastic band strategy’: women’s lived experiences of coping with domestic violence in Indonesia. Global Health Action. 2013;6:18894. doi:10.3402/gha.v6i0.18894.
  • McCleary-Sills J, Namy S, Nyoni J, et al. Stigma, shame and women’s limited agency in help-seeking for intimate partner violence. Glob Public Health. 2016;11:224–235.
  • United Nations Development Report (UNDP). Tanzania human development report 2014. Economic Transformation for Human Development; 2015. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/thdr2014-main.pdfILFS 2006
  • National Bureau of Statistics Tanzania. Analytical report for Integrated Labor Force Survey (ILFS) 2006. Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Planning, Economy and Empowerment; 2007.
  • National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) [Tanzania] and ICF Macro. Tanzania demographic and health survey 2010. Dar es Salaam (Tanzania): NBS and ICF Macro; 2011.
  • McCloskey LA, Williams C, Larsen U. Gender inequality and intimate partner violence among women in Moshi, Tanzania. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2005;31:124–130.
  • Vyas S, Jansen H, Heise L, et al. Exploring the association between women’s access to economic resources and intimate partner violence in Tanzania. Soc Sci Med. 2015b;146:307–315.
  • Vyas S, Heise L. How do area level socioeconomic status and gender norms affect partner violence against women? Evidence from Tanzania. Int J Public Health. 2016;61:971–980. DOI:10.1007/s00038-016-0876-y
  • Laisser RM, Lugina HI, Lindmark G, et al. Striving to make a difference: health care worker experiences with intimate partner violence clients in Tanzania. Health Care Women Int. 2009;30:64–78.
  • Laisser RM, Nystrom L, Lugina HI, et al. Community perceptions of intimate partner violence - a qualitative study from urban Tanzania. BMC Women’s Health. 2011;11:13. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-11-13.
  • Vyas S, Mbwambo J, Heise L. Women’s paid work and intimate partner violence: insights from Tanzania. Fem Econ. 2015a;21:35–58.
  • Panda P, Agarwal B. Marital violence, human development and women’s property status in India. World Dev. 2005;33:823–850.
  • Bhatla N, Chakraborty S, Duvvury N. Property ownership and inheritance rights of women as social protection from domestic violence: cross site analysis. Washington, (DC): International Centre for Research on Women; 2006.
  • ICRW, UNFPA. Intimate partner violence: high costs to households and communities. Washington, (DC): International Center for Research on Women (ICRW) and United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA); 2009.