The odd couple: using biomedical and intersectional approaches to address health inequities

References

• Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC). CDC health disparities and inequalities report. Atlanta: CDC, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Report on health inequalities in the European Union. Commission staff working document. Brussels: European Commission; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Touraine M. Health inequalities and France’s national health strategy. The Lancet. 2014;383:70–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Rio political declaration on social determinants of health. Rio de Janeiro: WHO; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Environmental health inequalities in Europe. Assessment report. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Handbook on health inequality monitoring with a special focus on low and middle-income countries. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Health 2020: a European policy framework supporting action across government and society for health and well-being. Copenhagen: WHO; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN). Narrowing the gaps to meet the goals. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF); 2015.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Horizon 2020: the EU framework programme for research and innovation. European Commission; 2015 [ cited 2016 Aug 26]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/area/health
   Google Scholar
• Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, et al., The Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. The Lancet. 2008;372:1661–1669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Health in South America: health situation, policies and systems overview. 2nd ed. Washington (DC): PAHO; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Caiola C, Docherty SL, Relf M, et al. Using an intersectional approach to study the impact of social determinants of health for African American mothers living with HIV. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2014;37:287–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein G, Shildrick M. The postconventional body: re-theorizing women’s health. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:293–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankivsky O. Women’s health, men’s health, and gender and health: implications of intersectionality. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1712–1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankivsky O, De Leeuw S, Lee JA, et al. Introduction: purpose, overview, and contribution. In: Hankivsky O, editor. Health inequities in Canada: intersectional frameworks and practices. Vancouver: UBC Press; 2011. p. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly U. Integrating intersectionality and biomedicine in health disparities research. Adv Nurs Sci. 2009;32:E42–E56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson JL, Repta R, Kalyan S. Implications for sex and gender in health research. In: Oliffe J, Greaves L, editors. Designing and conducting gender, sex, and health research. San Francisco: Sage; 2012. p. 39–64.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein G. Situated neuroscience: exploring biologies of diversity. In: Bluhm R, Maibom H, Jacobson AJ, editors. Neurofeminism: issues at the intersection of feminist theory and cognitive science. London: Palgrave McMillan; 2012. p. 145–174.
   Google Scholar
• Hankivsky O, editor. Health inequities in Canada: intersectional frameworks and practices. Vancouver: UBC Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hinze SW, Lin J, Andersson TE. Can we capture the intersections? Older Black women, education, and health. Women’s Health Issues. 2012;22:e91–e98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren KG, Olofsson A. Intersectional approaches in health-risk research: a critical review. Sociol Compass. 2014;8:1112–1126.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick M, Steinberg DL. Estranged bodies: shifting paradigms and the biomedical body. Body Soc. 2015;2:3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Weber L. Reconstructing the landscape of health disparities research: promoting dialogue and collaboration between the feminist intersectional and positivist biomedical traditions. In: Schulz A, Mullings L, editors. Race, class, gender and health: intersectional approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003. p. 21–59.
   Google Scholar
• Krieger N. Embodying inequality: a review of concepts, measures, and methods for studying health consequences of discrimination. Int J Health Serv. 1999;29:295–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger N. Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: an ecosocial perspective. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:668–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger N. Does racism harm health? Did child abuse exist before 1962? On explicit questions, critical science, and current controversies: an ecosocial perspective. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:194–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger N. Genders, sexes, and health: what are the connections—and why does it matter? Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:652–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger N. Methods for the scientific study of discrimination and health: an ecosocial approach. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:936–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topol EJ. Individualized medicine from prewomb to tomb. Cell. 2014;157:241–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germov J. Imagining health problems as social issues. In: Germov J, Hornosty J, editors. Second opinion: an introduction to health sociology. Don Mills: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Russell L. Sociology for health professionals. London: SAGE Publications; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Courtenay W. Counseling men about their health. In: Englar-Carlson M, Evans MP, Duffy T, editors. A counselor’s guide to working with men. Virginia: American Counseling Association; 2014. p. 87–110.
   Google Scholar
• Krieger N. Got theory? On the 21st c. CE rise of explicit use of epidemiologic theories of disease distribution: A review and ecosocial analysis. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2014;1:45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke AE, Shim J. Medicalization and biomedicalization revisited: technoscience and transformations of health, illness and American medicine. In: Pescosolido B, Martin JK, McLeod JD, et al., editors. Handbook of the sociology of health, illness, and healing. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 173–199.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein S. Bodily differences and collective identities: the politics of gender and race in biomedical research in the United States. Body Soc. 2004;10:183–203.
   Google Scholar
• Shim JK. Understanding the routinised inclusion of race, socioeconomic status and sex in epidemiology: the utility of concepts from technoscience studies. Sociol Health Illn. 2002;24:129–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael D. Tackling health inequalities: lessons from international experiences. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Closing the gap: policy into practice on social determinants of health. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hofrichter R, Bhatia R. Tackling health inequities through public health practice: theory to action. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fausto-Sterling A. Sexing the body: gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Fausto-Sterling A. The bare bones of sex: part 1—sex and gender. Signs. 2005;30:1491–1527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausto-Sterling A. The dynamic development of gender variability. J Homosex. 2012;59:398–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekker MHJ. Investigating gender within health research is more than sex disaggregation of data: a multi-facet gender and health model. Psychol Health Med. 2003;8:32–243.
   Google Scholar
• Bird CE, Rieker PP. Gender and health: the effects of constrained choices and social policies. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Annandale E. Women’s health and social change. New York: Routledge; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein G. Measuring biological sex. In: Oliffe J, Greaves L, editors. Designing and conducting gender, sex, and health research. San Francisco: Sage; 2012. p. 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Springer KW, Stellman JM, Jordan-Young RM. Beyond a catalogue of differences: A theoretical frame and good practice guidelines for researching sex/gender in human health. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1817–1824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz SA, Antle DM, Côté J, et al. First steps for integrating sex and gender considerations into basic experimental biomedical research. Faseb J. 2014;28:4–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach JD, Figert AE. Women’s health research: public policy and sociology. J Health Soc Behav. 1995;35:115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich B, English D. Witches, midwives, and nurses: A history of women healers. CUNY, New York (NY): Feminist Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mastroianni AC, Faden R, Federman D. Women and health research: ethical and legal issues of including women in clinical studies. Vol. 1. Washington: National Academies Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Doyal L. Sex, gender and health: the need for a new approach. BMJ. 2001;323:1061–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greaves L. Why put gender and sex into health research? In: Oliffe J, Greaves L, editors. Designing and conducting gender, sex & health research. San Francisco: SAGE; 2012. p. 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers WA. Feminism and public health ethics. J Med Ethics. 2006;32:351–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers J, Kelly UA. Feminist intersectionality: bringing social justice to health disparities research. Nurs Ethics. 2011;18:397–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwin S. No longer patient: feminist ethics and health care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker I, Beery AK. Males still dominate animal studies. Nature. 2010;465:690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton JA, Collins FS. Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies. Nature. 2014;509:282–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyal L. Gender equity in health: debates and dilemmas. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:931–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahagan J, Gray K, Whynacht A. Sex and gender matter in health research: addressing health inequities in health research reporting. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14:1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JL, Greaves L, Repta R. Better science with sex and gender: A primer for health research. Vancouver: Women’s Health Research Network; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hankivsky O, Springer KW, Bates LM. Response to Johnson and Beaudet’s commentary: moving beyond sex and gender reporting in health research. Can J Public Health. 2015;106:e165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agénor M, Krieger N, Austin SB, et al. At the intersection of sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, and cervical cancer screening: assessing Pap test use disparities by sex of sexual partners among black, Latina, and white US women. Soc Sci Med. 2014;116:110–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw KW. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ Chicago Leg Forum. 1989;138:67.
   Google Scholar
• Bunjun B. Feminist organizations and intersectionality: contesting hegemonic feminism. Atlantis. 2010;34:115–126.
   Google Scholar
• Collins PH. Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Valdes F. Foreword: poised at the cusp: LatCrit theory outsider jurisprudence and Latina/o self-empowerment. Harv Latino L Rev. 1997;2:1.
   Google Scholar
• Van Herk KA, Smith D, Andrew C. Identity matters: aboriginal mothers’ experiences of accessing health care. Contemp Nurse. 2011;37:57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer GR. Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: challenges and the potential to advance health equity. Soc Sci Med. 2014;110:10–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowleg L. The problem with the phrase women and minorities: intersectionality—an important theoretical framework for public health. Am J Pub Hlth. 2012;102:1267–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankivsky O, Grace D, Hunting G, et al. Intersectionality-based policy analysis. In: Hankivsky O, editor. An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework. Vancouver (BC): Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy, Simon Fraser University; 2012. p. 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Doyal L. Challenges in researching life with HIV/AIDS: an intersectional analysis of black African migrants in London. Cult Health Sex. 2009;11:173–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates LM, Hankivsky O, Springer KW. Gender and health inequities: a comment on the final report of the WHO commission on the social determinants of health. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1002–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankivsky O, Cormier R, De Merich D. Intersectionality: moving women’s health research and policy forward. Vancouver: Women’s Health Research Network; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz AJ, Mullings L. Gender, race, class, and health: intersectional approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Sen G, Iyer A, Mukherjee C. A methodology to analyse the intersections of social inequalities in health. J Hum Dev Capabilities. 2009;10:397–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber L, Parra-Medina D. Intersectionality and women’s health: charting a path to eliminating health disparities. In: Demos V, Segal MT, editors. Advances in gender research: gender perspectives on health and medicine. Oxford: Elsevier Science, Ltd; 2003. p. 183–226.
   Google Scholar
• Hankivsky O. Intersectionality 101. Vancouver: Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy, Simon Fraser University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Shim JK. Heart-sick: the politics of risk, inequality, and heart disease. New York: NYU Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Van Mens-Verhulst J, Radtke HL Intersectionality and health care: support for the diversity turn in research and practice. Unpublished paper; 2006 [ cited 2016 Aug 27]. Available from: http://www.vanmens.info/verhulst/en/wp-content/Intersectionality%20and%20Health%20Care-%20january%202006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong P. Stigma, discrimination and living with HIV/AIDS: a cross cultural perspective. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Grulich A, Zablotska I. Commentary: probability of HIV transmission through anal intercourse. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:1064–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyal L, Doyal L. Living with HIV and dying with AIDS: inequality, diversity and human rights in the global pandemic. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• UNAIDS. Global AIDS update 2016. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ramjee G, Daniels B. Women and HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Res Ther. 2013;10:30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNAIDS. Empower young women and adolescent girls: fast-track the end of the AIDS epidemic in Africa. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins J, Hoffman S, Dworkin SL. Rethinking gender, heterosexual men, and women’s vulnerability to HIV/AIDS. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:435–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhurst J. Understanding the correlations between wealth, poverty and human immunodeficiency virus infection in African countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:519–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly U, Pich K. Community-based PTSD treatment for Latinas who experienced intimate partner violence. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2014;35:906–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green BL, Kimmerling R. Trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder, and health status. In: Schnurr PP, Green BL, editors. Trauma and health: physical health consequences of exposure to extreme stress. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2004. p. 13–42.
   Google Scholar
• Purdie-Vaughns V, Eibach RP. Intersectional invisibility: the distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles. 2008;59:377–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowleg L. When black + lesbian + woman ≠ black lesbian woman: the methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles. 2008;59:312–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Community-based participatory research for health. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein G. From body to brain: considering the neurobiological effects of female genital cutting. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51:84–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Einstein G. Cardiovascular disease in Somali women in the diaspora. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2012;6:229–237.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz EA. Volatile bodies: toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Berg RC, Underland V. The obstetric consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon H, Comerasamy H, Morris NH. Female genital mutilation: experience in a West London clinic. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27:416–419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson-Agbakwu CE, Helm T, Killawi A, et al. Perceptions of obstetrical interventions and female genital cutting: insights of men in a Somali refugee community. Ethn Health. 2014;19:440–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim JK. Constructing ‘race’ across the science-lay divide racial formation in the epidemiology and experience of cardiovascular disease. Soc Stud Sci. 2005;35:405–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhamoon RK, Hankivsky O. Why the theory and practice of intersectionality matter to health research and policy. In: Hankivsky O, editor. Health inequities in Canada: intersectional frameworks and practices. Vancouver: UBC Press; 2011. p. 16–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sen A. Quoted in Dhamoon RK, Hankivsky O. Why the theory and practice of intersectionality matter to health research and policy. In: Hankivsky O, editor. Health inequities in Canada: intersectional frameworks and practices. Vol. 2011. Vancouver: UBC Press; 2008. p. 16–50.
   Google Scholar