References
- Wiseman V, Mitton C, Doyle-Waters MM, et al. Using economic evidence to set healthcare priorities in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review of methodological frameworks: priority setting: systematic review. Health Econ. 2016;25:140–13.
- Bollyky TJ, Templin T, Cohen M, et al. Lower-income countries that face the most rapid shift in noncommunicable disease burden are also the least prepared. Health Aff. 2017;36:1866–1875.
- Glassman A, Chalkidou K, Giedion U, et al. Priority-setting institutions in health. Glob Heart. 2012;7:13–34.
- Chalkidou K, Glassman A, Marten R, et al. Priority-setting for achieving universal health coverage. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94:462–467.
- Pitt C, Vassall A, Teerawattananon Y, et al. Foreword: health economic evaluations in low- and middle-income countries: methodological issues and challenges for priority setting: foreword: economic evaluations in LMICs. Health Econ. 2016;25:1–5.
- World Health Organization (WHO). Using Health Technology Assessment for Universal Health Coverage and Reimbursement Systems [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (WHO); 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/health-technology-assessment/HTA_November_meeting_report_Final.pdf.
- Chalkidou K, Li R, Culyer AJ, et al. Health technology assessment: global advocacy and local realities comment on “priority setting for universal health coverage: we need evidence-informed deliberative processes, not just more evidence on cost-effectiveness.”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;6:233–236.
- World Health Organization (WHO). 2015 Global Survey on Health Technology Assessment by National Authorities Main findings [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (WHO); Available from: http://www.who.int/health-technology-assessment/MD_HTA_oct2015_final_web2.pdf.
- Marten R, McIntyre D, Travassos C, et al. An assessment of progress towards universal health coverage in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). The Lancet. 2014;384:2164–2171.
- Chootipongchaivat S, Tritasavit N, Luz A, et al. Condusive Factors to the Development of Health Technology Assessment in Asia. [Internet]. Muang, Thailand: Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP); 2016. Available from: https://f1000research.com/documents/6-486.
- Gray K, Gills BK. South–south cooperation and the rise of the Global South. Third World Q. 2016;37:557–574.
- World Health Organization (WHO). BRICS seek value for money as health-care costs rise. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92:392–393.
- International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI) [Internet]. 2017 [ cited 2017 Nov 20]. Available from: http://www.idsihealth.org.
- International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI). iDSI South south knowledge sharing workshops johannesburg South Africa 2017. [Internet]. 2017 [ cited 2017 Aug 24]. Available from: http://www.idsihealth.org/.
- Li R, Hernandez-Villafuerte K, Towse A, et al. Mapping priority setting in health in 17 countries across Asia, Latin America, and sub-Saharan Africa. Health Systems & Reform. 2016;2:71–83.
- Chen Y, Banta D, Tang Z. Health technology assessment development in China. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:202–209.
- The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics [Internet]. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1SP UK: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009 [ cited 2018 Sep 4]. Available from: http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/hdbk_compolitics.
- Della Porta D, Keating M, editors. Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
- Lor PJ. International and comparative librarianship A thematic approach. München: De Gruyter Saur; 2012.
- Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, et al. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology [Internet]. 2012 [ cited 2018 Sep 4]. 12. Available from: http://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2288-12-181.
- CASP UK. Critical appraisal skills programme (CASP Qualitative Checklist) [Internet]. 2017 [ cited 2018 Feb 20]. Available from: http://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/dded87_25658615020e427da194a325e7773d42.pdf.
- Liu W, Shi L, Pong RW, et al. Differences in evaluating health technology assessment knowledge translation by researchers and policy makers in china. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30:612–620.
- Koh L, Glaetzer C, Li S C, et al. Health technology assessment, international reference pricing, and budget control tools from china’s perspective: what are the current developments and future considerations? Value in Health Reg Issues. 2016;9:15–21.
- Liu W, Shi L, Pong RW, et al. Determinants of knowledge translation from health technology assessment to policy-making in China: from the perspective of researchers. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0190732. van Wouwe JP, editor.
- Zhen X, Sun X, Dong H. Health technology assessment and its use in drug policies in China. Value in Health Reg Issues. 2018;15:138–148.
- Gross A Reimbursement in China [Internet]. 2010 [ cited 2017 Aug 24]. Available from: www.raps.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=3268.
- Mossialos E, Ge Y, Hu J, et al. Pharmaceutical Policy in China: Challenges and Opportunities for Reform. [Internet]. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/320465/Pharmaceutical-policy-China-challenges-opportunities-reform.pdf.
- Mukherjee A Fiscal devolution and health financing reform: lessons for India from Brazil, China and Mexico. (CGD Policy Paper 97). Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
- Barber S, Yao L Health Insurance Systems in China: a Briefing Note. [Internet]. (Background Paper 37). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthsystems/topics/financing/healthreport/37ChinaB_YFINAL.pdf.
- Yu H. Universal health insurance coverage for 1.3 billion people: what accounts for China’s success? Health Policy. 2015;119:1145–1152.
- Yang W, Wu X. Providing comprehensive health insurance coverage in rural China: a critical appraisal of the new cooperative medical scheme and ways forward. Global Policy. 2017;8:110–116.
- Yuan B, Jian W, He L, et al. The role of health system governance in strengthening the rural health insurance system in China. International journal for equity in health [Internet]. 2017 [ cited 2018 Sep 4]. 16. Available from: http://equityhealthj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12939-017-0542-x.
- Barber SL, Huang B, Santoso B, et al. The reform of the essential medicines system in China: a comprehensive approach to universal coverage Internet. J Glob Health. 2013;3. [ cited 2018 Sep 4]. Available from: http://www.jogh.org/documents/issue201301/V3_Barber.pdf
- Kennedy-Martin T, Mitchell BD, Boye KS, et al. The health technology assessment environment in mainland China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan—implications for the evaluation of diabetes mellitus therapies. Value in Health Reg Issues. 2014;3:108–116.
- Hu J, Mossialos E. Pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement in China: when the whole is less than the sum of its parts. Health Policy. 2016;120:519–534.
- Blumenthal D, Hsiao W. Lessons from the East China’s rapidly evolving health care system. New England J Med. 2015;372:1281–1285.
- Qing X. Towards the “International examination room” China health technology assessment submitted a high score [Internet]. 2017 [ cited 2018 Feb 10]. Available from: http://www.cn-healthcare.com/article/20171110/content-497125.html.
- Chalkidou K Launch of China Health Policy and Technology Assessment Network under the auspices of NHFPC [Internet]. 2017 [ cited 2017 Oct 21]. Available from: http://www.idsihealth.org/blog/launch-of-china-health-policy-and-technology-assessment-network-under-auspices-of-national-health-and-family-planning-committee/.
- Li M. China HTA Hub [Internet]. Johannesburg, South Africa; 2016. Available from: http://www.idsihealth.org/blog/idsi-south-south-knowledge-sharing-workshops-johannesburg-south-africa/.
- Zhao K. China HTA Development [Internet]. Johannesburg; 2016. Available from: http://www.idsihealth.org/blog/idsi-south-south-knowledge-sharing-workshops-johannesburg-south-africa/.
- Health Technology Assessment and Its Applications in China [Internet]. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR); 2017 [ cited 2018 Oct 2]. Available from: http://press.ispor.org/asia/index.php/2017/10/19/health-technology-assessment-and-its-applications-in-china/.
- Zhao K, Xue L, Guo W, et al. Coming rapidly of age: health technology assessment in China [Internet]. Available from: https://globalforum.diaglobal.org/issue/may-2018/coming-rapidly-of-age-health-technology-assessment-in-china/.
- Ruiz F, Krajenbrink E Launch of new Chinese health ministry should help develop UK-China partnership in Health Technology Assessment [Internet]. Available from: https://www.idsihealth.org/blog/launch-of-new-chinese-health-ministry-should-help-develop-uk-china-partnership-in-health-technology-assessment.
- Downey LE, Mehndiratta A, Grover A, et al. Institutionalising health technology assessment: establishing the medical technology assessment board in India. BMJ Global Health. 2017;2:e000259.
- Jain N, Kumar A, Nandrai S, et al. NSSO 71st Round: same data, multiple interpretations. Econ Polit Wkly. 2015;50:84–87.
- Kumar M, Ebrahim S, Taylor FC, et al. Health technology assessment in India: the potential for improved healthcare decision-making. Natl Med J India. 2014;27:159–163.
- Sivalal S. Health technology assessment in the Asia Pacific region. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:196–201.
- World Health Organization. Global Health Expenditure Database [Internet]. [ cited 2017 Aug 31]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/nha/database/Select/Indicators/en.
- La Forgio G, Nagpal S. Government-sponsored health insurance in India are you covered? Washington: World Bank; 2012.
- MoHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). National Health Insurance Schemes 2016. [Internet]. 2016 [ cited 2017 Aug 31]. Health Insurance Scheme (UHIS). Available from: https://www.nhp.gov.in/national-health-insurance-schemes_pg#Universal.
- Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS). About CGHS [Internet]. 2017 [ cited 2017 Aug 31]. Available from: http://msotransparent.nic.in/cghsnew/index.asp.
- Prinja S, Chauhan AS, Karan A, et al. Impact of publicly financed health insurance schemes on healthcare utilization and financial risk protection in india: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0170996. Xia C-Y, editor.
- Kumar K, Singh A, Kumar S, et al. Socio-economic differentials in impoverishment effects of out-of-pocket health expenditure in China and India: evidence from WHO SAGE. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0135051. Nugent RA, editor.
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. National Health Policy 2017 [Internet]. 2017 [ cited 2017 Oct 13]. Available from https://www.nhp.gov.in//NHPfiles/national_health_policy_2017.pdf.
- Sakharkar P. Draft national health policy of India and determining cost-effectiveness threshold. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2017;8:1.
- Government of India, Planning Commission. Twelfth Five Year Plan (2012-2017) Social Sectors (Volume III) [Internet]. Government of India; 2013. Available from: http://planningcommission.gov.in/plans/planrel/12thplan/pdf/12fyp_vol2.pdf.
- Aayog NITI. Three year action agenda, 2017-18 to 2019-20 [Internet]. 2017 [ cited 2017 Nov 15]. Available from: http://niti.gov.in/content/three-year-action-agenda-2017-18-2019-20.
- Prinja S, Kaur G, Malhotra P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of autologous stem cell treatment as compared to conventional chemotherapy for treatment of multiple myeloma in India. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2017;33:31–40.
- World Health Organization. National List of Essential Medicines 2015 India [Internet]. [ cited 2017 Sep 22]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s23088en/s23088en.pdf.
- Report of the Core-Committee for Revision of National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM) [Internet]. World Health Organization; [ cited 2017 Sep 22]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s23087en/s23087en.pdf.
- Prinja S, Downey LE, Gauba VK, et al. Health technology assessment for policy making in India: current scenario and way forward. PharmacoEcon Open. 2018;2:1–3.
- National health Systems Resource Centre. National health Accounts – Guidelines for India [Internet]. 2016 [ cited 2017 Sep 22]. Available from: http://nhsrcindia.org/NATIONAL%20HEALTH%20ACCOUNTS-%20GUIDELINES%20FOR%20INDIA-2016.pdf.
- Cluzeau F Towards national standard treatment guidelines (STGs) for India [Internet]. 2015 [ cited 2017 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.idsihealth.org/blog/india-standard-treatment-guidelines/.
- Downey LE MTAB and HTA in India [Internet]. Johannesburg; 2016. Available from: http://www.idsihealth.org/blog/idsi-south-south-knowledge-sharing-workshops-johannesburg-south-africa/.
- Lahariya C. Taking the road less traveled: economic analyses for advancing universal health coverage. J Postgrad Med. 2018;64:134.
- HTAin. Health Technology Assessment in India - HTAIn [Internet]. 2018 [ cited 2018 Aug 29]. Available from: https://dhr.gov.in/sites/default/files/eNewsletter/img/HTAIn/HTAIn10-01-2017.pdf.
- HTAIn. About Health Technology Assessment in India (HTAIn) [Internet]. 2018 [ cited 2018 Aug 29]. Available from: https://dhr.gov.in/about-mtab.
- iDSI health. First capacity building for HTA in India workshop kicks off in Delhi [Internet]. Available from: https://www.idsihealth.org/blog/first-capacity-building-for-hta-in-india-workshop-kicks-off-in-delhi/.
- Section27. Health and Democracy [Internet]. Johannesburg; 2017 [ cited 2017 Dec 13]. Available from: http://section27.org.za/2007/06/health-and-democracy/.
- Erasmus D, Ranchod S, Abraham M Challenges and opportunities for health finance in South Africa: a supply and regulatory perspective [Internet]. Johannesburg: FinMark Trust; 2016 [ cited 2017 Oct 20]. Available from: http://www.finmark.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/south-africa-health-finanince-overview.pdf.
- Burger R, Ranchod S, Roussouw L, et al. Strengthening the measurement of quality of care. In: Padarath A, King J, Mackie E, et al., editors. South African health review. Durban: Health Systems Trust; 2016. p. 192.
- Health Market Inquiry: Provisional Findings and Recommendations Report [Internet]. Competition Commission South Africa; 2018 [ cited 2018 Aug 22]. Available from: http://www.compcom.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Health-Market-Inquiry-1.pdf.
- National Department of Health. National Health Insurance for South Africa: towards Universal Health Coverage White Paper 2017 [Internet]. 2017 [ cited 2017 Oct 10]. Available from: http://www.health.gov.za/index.php/component/phocadownload/category/383.
- National Department of Health. National Health Insurance Bill 2018 [Internet]. 2018 [ cited 2018 Aug 24]. Available from: file:///C:/Users/kemac/Downloads/national%20health%20insurance%20bill%202018.pdf.
- Hofman KJ, McGee S, Chalkidou K, et al. National health insurance in South Africa: relevance of a national priority-setting agency. South Afr Med J. 2015;105:739.
- Siegfried N, Wilkinson T, Hofman K. Where from and Where to for health technology assessment in South Africa? A legal and policy landscape analysis. In: Padarath A, Barron P, editors. South African health review. Durban: Health Systems Trust; 2017. p. 44.
- Perumal-Pillay VA, Suleman F Quantitative evaluation of essential medicines lists: the South African case study. BMC Health Services Research [Internet]. 2016 [ cited 2018 Sep 4]. 16. Available from: http://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-016-1937-x.
- Perumal-Pillay VA, Suleman F Selection of essential medicines for South Africa - An analysis of in-depth interviews with national essential medicines list committee members. BMC Health Services Research [Internet]. 2017;17. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85008441772&doi=10.1186%2fs12913-016-1946-9&partnerID=40&md5=c5274346f816f54947da4937203f2de0.
- National Health Laboratory Services. Health Technology Assessment Unit [Internet]. 2017 [ cited 2017 Nov 10]. Available from: http://www.nhls.ac.za/?page=hta_unit&id=87.
- Govender M, Letshokgohla M, Basu D Health technology assessment - a new initiative in South Africa. South African Medical Journal [Internet]. 100. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742010000600004.
- Miot J, Thiede M Adapting pharmacoeconomics to shape efficient health systems en route to UHC - Lessons from two continents. Frontiers in Pharmacology [Internet]. 2017;8. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85031123616&doi=10.3389%2ffphar.2017.00715&partnerID=40&md5=99d5f082c6768e3b0f8bd41cad8fb753.
- National Treasury of South Africa. 2018 Budget estimates of expenditure: Vite 16 Health [Internet]. [ cited 2018 Aug 24]. Available from: http://www.treasury.gov.za/documents/national%20budget/2018/enebooklets/Vote%2016%20Health.pdf.
- Li R, Ruiz F, Culyer AJ, et al. Evidence-informed capacity building for setting health priorities in low- and middle-income countries: a framework and recommendations for further research. F1000Res. 2017;6:231.
- Mújica OJ, Vázquez E, Duarte EC, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities and mortality trends in BRICS, 1990–2010. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92:405–412.
- Glassman A, Giedion U, Smith P, editors. What’s what’s out. Washington DC: Centre for Global Development; 2017.
- Cookson R, Mirelman AJ, Griffin S, et al. Using cost-effectiveness analysis to address health equity concerns. Value in Health. 2017;20:206–212.
- Miranda JJ, Kinra S, Casas JP, et al. Non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: context, determinants and health policy. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:1225–1234.
- United Nations Office for South-South Collaboration. What is South-South Cooperation? [Internet]. 2017 [ cited 2017 May 31]. Available from: http://ssc.undp.org/content/ssc/about/what_is_ssc.html.
- World Health Organization. South-South and Triangular Cooperation [Internet]. 2017 [ cited 2017 May 31]. Available from: http://www.who.int/country-cooperation/what-who-does/south-south/en/.
- Rosseel P, De Corte E, Blommaert J, et al. Approaches to North-South, South-South and North-South-South Collaboration: A policy document. [Internet]. 2009. Available from: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/229636/1/POLICY_PAPER _VLIR_UWC__NSS.pdf.
- McGee S, Truter I, Brand M, et al. The South African guidelines for pharmacoeconomic submissions: a review in context of existing legislation and challenges to implementation. Value in Health. 2015;18:A573.