Development, feasibility and acceptability of a gamified cognitive DEvelopmental assessment on an E-Platform (DEEP) in rural Indian pre-schoolers – a pilot study

References

• Black MM, Walker SP, Fernald LCH, et al. Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course. Lancet Lond Engl. 2017;389:77–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali SS. A brief review of risk-factors for growth and developmental delay among preschool children in developing countries. Adv Biomed Res. 2013;2:91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, et al. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet Lond Engl. 2007;369:60–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair NL, Hanson JL, Wolfe BL, et al. Association of child poverty, brain development, and academic achievement. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:822–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRATHAM. ASER 2014: annual status of education report. New Delhi (India): ASER Centre; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee SB, Aneja S, Krishnamurthy V, et al. Incorporating developmental screening and surveillance of young children in office practice. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:627–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linan-Thompson S. Screening of school readiness skills: a review of the literature. USA: USAID; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant and toddler development. 3rd ed. USA: Pearson Clinical; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Alpern GD. Developmental profile 3, DP-3: manual. USA: WPS; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence^TM. Fourth ed. (WPPSITM - IV). USA: Pearson Clinical; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A. Mental health services in rural India: challenges and prospects. Health (N.Y.). 2011;3:757.
   Google Scholar
• Dussault G, Franceschini MC. Not enough there, too many here: understanding geographical imbalances in the distribution of the health workforce. Hum Resour Health. 2006;4:12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richter LM, Daelmans B, Lombardi J, et al. Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: pathways to scale up for early childhood development. Lancet Lond Engl. 2017;389:103–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle PL, Black MM, Behrman JR, et al. Strategies to avoid the loss of developmental potential in more than 200 million children in the developing world. Lancet Lond Engl. 2007;369:229–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black MM, Fernandez-Rao S, Hurley KM, et al. Growth and development among infants and preschoolers in rural India: economic inequities and caregiver protective/promotive factors. Int J Behav Dev. 2016;40:526–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson LM, Shinn C, Fullilove MT, et al. The effectiveness of early childhood development programs. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24:32–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh AK, Kumar R, Mishra CK, et al. Moving from survival to healthy survival through child health screening and early intervention services under Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK). Indian J Pediatr. 2015;82:1012–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair MKC, Russell PS. Development and normative validation of developmental assessment tool for anganwadis for 3- to 4-year-old children (DATA-II). J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertem IO, Dogan DG, Gok CG, et al. A guide for monitoring child development in low- and middle-income countries. Pediatrics. 2008;121:e581–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertem IO, Krishnamurthy V, Mulaudzi MC, et al. Similarities and differences in child development from birth to age 3 years by sex and across four countries: a cross-sectional, observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e279–e291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infant and young child development [Internet]. Available from: https://ezcollab.who.int/iycd
   Google Scholar
• TRAI. The Indian telecom services performance indicators. New Delhi (India): Government of India; 2017 July 5.
   Google Scholar
• Herodotou C. Young children and tablets: A systematic review of effects on learning and development. J Comput Assist Learn. 2018;34:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz NAA, Batmaz F, Stone R, et al. Selection of touch gestures for children’s applications. Sci Inf Conf. 2013;721–726.
   Google Scholar
• Aziz NAA, Sin NSM, Batmaz F, et al. Selection of touch gestures for children’s applications: repeated experiment to increase reliability. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2014;5:97–102.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub S, Bauer PJ, Zelazo PD, et al. I. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): introduction and pediatric data. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2013;78:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge Cognition. CANTAB® [Cognitive assessment software] [Internet]. 2017. Available from: www.cantab.com
   Google Scholar
• Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG. Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS vital signs. Arch Clin Neuropsychol Off J Natl Acad Neuropsychol. 2006;21:623–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumsden J, Edwards EA, Lawrence NS, et al. Gamification of cognitive assessment and cognitive training: a systematic review of applications and efficacy. JMIR Serious Games. 2016;4:e11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzulewicz A, Sobota K, Delafield-Butt JT. Toward the autism motor signature: gesture patterns during smart tablet gameplay identify children with autism. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peijnenborgh JC, Hurks PP, Aldenkamp AP, et al. A study on the validity of a computer-based game to assess cognitive processes, reward mechanisms, and time perception in children aged 4–8 years. JMIR Serious Games. 2016;4:e15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kołakowska A, Landowska A, Anzulewicz A, et al. Automatic recognition of therapy progress among children with autism. Sci Rep. 2017;7:13863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra J, Merzenich MM, Sagar R. Accessible online neuroplasticity-targeted training for children with ADHD. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Ment Health. 2013;7:38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bul KCM, Franken IHA, Van der Oord S, et al. Development and user satisfaction of “plan-it commander,” a serious game for children with ADHD. Games Health J. 2015;4:502–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovis S, Van der Oord S, Wiers RW, et al. Improving executive functioning in children with ADHD: training multiple executive functions within the context of a computer game. a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. PloS One. 2015;10:e0121651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor HAM, Shahbodin F, Pee NC. Serious game for autism children: review of literature. Int J Psychol Behav Sci. 2012;6(4):554–559.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka JW, Wolf JM, Klaiman C, et al. Using computerized games to teach face recognition skills to children with autism spectrum disorder: the let’s face it! Program. J Child Psychol Psychiatr. 2010;51:944–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubber PJ, Outhwaite LA, Chigeda A, et al. Should touch screen tablets be used to improve educational outcomes in primary school children in developing countries? Front Psychol. 2016;7:839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitchford NJ, Papini C, Outhwaite LA, et al. Fine motor skills predict maths ability better than they predict reading ability in the early primary school years. Front Psychol. 2016;7:783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitchford NJ. Development of early mathematical skills with a tablet intervention: a randomized control trial in Malawi. Front Psychol. 2015;6:485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Outhwaite LA, Gulliford A, Pitchford NJ. Closing the gap: efficacy of a tablet intervention to support the development of early mathematical skills in UK primary school children. Comput Educ. 2017;108:43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmelmann K, Nordt M, Sommer K, et al. U can touch this: how tablets can be used to study cognitive development. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitchford NJ, Outhwaite LA. Can touch screen tablets be used to assess cognitive and motor skills in early years primary school children? A cross-cultural study. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Józsa K, Barrett KC, Morgan GA. Game-like tablet assessment of approaches to learning: assessing mastery motivation and executive functions. Electron J Res Educ Psychol. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 May 3];15. Available from: http://ojs.ual.es/ojs/index.php/EJREP/article/view/1734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai F, Brooks-Gunn J, Waldfogel J. Head start and urban children’s school readiness: a birth cohort study in 18 cities. Dev Psychol. 2011;47:134–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National family health survey 4 (2014–15) [Internet]. [cited 2018 Sep 17]. Available from: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/FCTS/HR/HR_FactSheet_85_Rewari.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Simple toddler pop dots. Byteflakes; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Puzzle for children: the educational game for toddlers and kids to learn letters, numbers, shapes and colors. POTRYAS - educational games for toddlers and kids; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kids preschool learning games. Greysprings Software Solutions Private Limited; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Team RC. R development core team. R Internals R Dev Core Team. 2015;1:63.
   Google Scholar
• Ward DJ, Furber C, Tierney S, et al. Using Framework Analysis in nursing research: a worked example. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69:2423–2431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan GJ, Dowsett CJ, Claessens A, et al. School readiness and later achievement. Dev Psychol. 2007;43:1428–1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purpura DJ, Schmitt SA, Ganley CM. Foundations of mathematics and literacy: the role of executive functioning components. J Exp Child Psychol. 2017;153:15–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdine BN, Lucca KR, Golinkoff RM, et al. The shape of things: the origin of young children’s knowledge of the names and properties of geometric forms. J Cogn Dev Off J Cogn Dev Soc. 2016;17:142–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair C. School readiness. Integrating cognition and emotion in a neurobiological conceptualization of children’s functioning at school entry. Am Psychol. 2002;57:111–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis EE, Pitchford NJ, Limback E. The interrelation between cognitive and motor development in typically developing children aged 4–11 years is underpinned by visual processing and fine manual control. Br J Psychol Lond Engl 1953. 2011;102:569–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu AS. Narrative in exergames: thoughts on procedure, mechanism, and others. Games Health J. 2015;4:19–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar