Towards a framework for multisector and multilevel collaboration: case of HIV and AIDS governance in South Africa

References

• Salunke S, Lal DK. Multisectoral approach for promoting public health. Indian J Public Health. 2017;61:163.
   Google Scholar
• Jerling J, Pelletier D, Franzo J, et al. Supporting multisectoral action: capacity and nutrition leadership challenges facing Africa. In: Covic N, Hendriks SLE, editors. Achieving a nutrition revolution for Africa: the road to healthier diets and optimal nutrition. Washington D.C: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); 2016. p. 147–169
   Google Scholar
• Rasanathan K, Bennett S, Atkins V, et al. Governing multisectoral action for health in low-and middle-income countries. PLoS Med. 2017;14:e1002285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer E. The challenge of implementing multi-sectoral approach through aids councils in the Eastern Cape Province. Cape Town: Stellenbosch; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM. The design and implementation of cross‐sector collaborations: propositions from the literature. Public Admini Rev. 2006;66:44–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM. Designing and implementing cross‐sector collaborations: needed and challenging. Public Admin Rev. 2015;75:647–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey G, Crammond B, Keast R. Creating change in government to address the social determinants of health: how can efforts be improved? BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangcharoensathien V, Srisookwatana O, Pinprateep P, et al. Multisectoral actions for health: challenges and opportunities in complex policy environments. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6:359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanchanachitra C, Tangcharoensathien V, Patcharanarumol W, et al. Multisectoral governance for health: challenges in implementing a total ban on chrysotile asbestos in Thailand. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3:e000383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kickbusch I, Behrendt T. Implementing a health 2020 vision: governance for health in the 21st century. Making it happen. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Admin Res Theory. 2008;18:543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Secretariat. Guidelines for implementing a multi-sectoral approach to HIV and AIDS in Commonwealth countries. London, UK: Commonwealth Secretariat Health section, Division STP; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Leach WD. Collaborative public management and democracy: evidence from western watershed partnerships. Public Admin Rev. 2006;66:100–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham C. Theorizing collaboration practice. Public Manage Rev. 2003;5:401–423.
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann MA, Kuhn TR, Pfarrer MD. A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Acad Manage Rev. 2012;37:332–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangen S, Hayes JP, Cornforth C. Governing cross-sector, inter-organizational collaborations. Public Manage Rev. 2015;17:1237–1260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickramasinghe K Diverse perspectives on science and medicine [Internet]. EditorPLOS, editor. San Francisco, California: PLOS. 2017. [cited 2018]. Available from: http://blogs.plos.org/globalhealth/2017/07/multisectoral-action-for-noncommunicable-diseases-what-why-how/.
   Google Scholar
• Willis C, Greene J, Abramowicz A, et al. Strengthening the evidence and action on multi-sectoral partnerships in public health: an action research initiative. Health Promotion Chronic Dis Prev Canada. 2016;36:101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranoff R. Inside collaborative networks: ten lessons for public managers. Public Admin Rev. 2006;66:56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffardi AL, Cabello R, Garcia PJ. Toward greater inclusion: lessons from Peru in confronting challenges of multi-sector collaboration. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2012;32:245–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts JM. Governance for collaboratives: a guide to resolving power and conflict issues. Toronto (ON): Joan Roberts Consulting; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy JM. A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Admin Rev. 2012;72:409–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood DJ, Gray B. Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. J Appl Behav Sci. 1991;27:139–162.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. J Public Admin Res Theory. 2012;22:1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanleybrown F, Kania J, Kramer M. Channeling Change: making Collective impact Work. Stanford Social Innovation Rev. 2012;9(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson AM, Perry JL. Collaboration processes: inside the black box. Public Admin Rev. 2006;66:20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby BC, Bryson JM. A leadership framework for cross-sector collaboration. Public Manage Rev. 2005;7:177–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kar M. Governance of HIV/AIDS: implications for health sector response. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;2:39.
   Google Scholar
• Kickbusch I, Gleicher D. Governance for health in the 21st. century: WHO Regional Office for Europe Copenhagen; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• National AIDS Convention of South Africa. The national AIDS PLan for South Africa 1994-1995. Pretoria, South Africa: Government Printers; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of South Africa. HIV/AIDS and STD strategic plan for South Africa 2000-2005. Pretoria, South Africa Government printers; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of South Africa. HIV and AIDS & STI national strategic plan 2007-2011. Pretoria: Government printer; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of South Africa. National strategic plan on HIV, STI and TB 2012-2016. Pretoria: Government printers; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of South Africa. Let our actions count: South Africa’s National Strategic Plan for HIV, TB and STIs 2017-2022. Pretoria, South Africa: Government printers; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mahlangu P, Vearey J, Thomas L, et al. Implementing a multi-sectoral response to HIV: a case study of AIDS councils in the Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Glob Health Action. 2017;10:1387411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlangu P, Vearey J, Goudge J. Multisectoral (in)action: towards effective mainstreaming of HIV in public sector departments in South Africa. Afr J AIDS Res. forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torraco RJ. Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2005;4:356–367.
   Google Scholar
• Hopia H, Latvala E, Liimatainen L. Reviewing the methodology of an integrative review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016;30:662–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray B, Wood DJ. Collaborative alliances: moving from practice to theory. J Appl Behav Sci. 1991;27:3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kaats E, Opheij W. Creating conditions for promising collaboration. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 37–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sanni S, Wisdom JP, Ayo-Yusuf OA, et al. Multi-sectoral approach to noncommunicable disease prevention policy in Sub-Saharan Africa: a conceptual framework for analysis. Int J Health Serv. 2018;49(2). 0020731418774203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters E, Van Rensburg H, Meulemans H. The National Strategic Plan of South Africa: what are the prospects of success after the repeated failure of previous AIDS policy? Health Policy Plan. 2010;25:171–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy C, Lawrence T, Phillips N. Swimming with sharks: creating strategic change through multisector collaboration. Int J Strategic Change Manage. 2006;1:96–112.
   Google Scholar
• Straus D. How to make collaboration work: powerful ways to build consensus, solve problems, and make decisions. Oakland, USA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Putzel J. The politics of action on AIDS: a case study of Uganda. Public Admin Dev. 2004;24:19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodge T. The politics of HIV/AIDS in South Africa: government action and public response. Third World Q. 2015;36:1570–1591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider H, Fassin D. Denial and defiance: a socio-political analysis of AIDS in South Africa. Aids. 2002;16:S45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booher DE. Collaborative governance practices and democracy. Natl Civic Rev. 2004;93:32–46.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H. A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organ Sci. 2009;20:941–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thackaberry JA. “Discursive opening” and closing in organisational self-study: culture as trap and tool in wildland firefighting safety. Manage Commun Q. 2004;17:319–359.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham C, Hibbert P. Hit or myth? Stories of collaborative success. In: O’Flynn J, Wanna J, editors. Collaborative Governance: A new era of public policy in Australia? Australia: Australian National University E Press; 2008. p. 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham LB. Collaborative governance: emerging practices and the incomplete legal framework for public and stakeholder voice. J Disp Resol. 2009;2009(2):269.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlak AK, Heikkila T. Comparing collaborative mechanisms in large-scale ecosystem governance. Nat Resour J. 2006;46(3):657–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham C, Vangen S, Huxham C, et al. The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Manage Int J Res Theory. 2000;2:337–358.
   Google Scholar
• Innes JE, Booher DE. Planning with complexity: an introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. London: Routledge; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Parkhurst M, Preskill H. Learning in action: evaluating collective impact. In: Kania J, Hanleybrown F, Juster JS, editors. Collective insights on collective impact Stanford. California: Stanford Social Innovation Review; 2014:17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health Agency of Canada. Crossing sectors: experiences in intersectoral action, public policy and health. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens M. Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. Eur Law J. 2007;13:447–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavian S, Galaty D, Kombe G. Multisectoral HIV/AIDS Approaches in Africa: how are they evolving. In: Gillespie S, editor. AIDS, poverty, and hunger: challenges and responses. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2006:221–243.
   Google Scholar
• UNAIDS. 90-90-90: an ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic. Geneva, Switzerland: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• UNAIDS. Global AIDS Update: ending AIDS, progress towards the 90-90-90 targets. Geneva, Switzerland: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier D, Gervais S, Hafeez‐ur‐Rehman H, et al. Boundary‐spanning actors in complex adaptive governance systems: the case of multisectoral nutrition. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018;33:e293–e319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar