New impulses from international development for more comprehensive and balanced public engagement evaluation

References

• Wellcome Trust. Grant funding data 2019; [2019 June 6]. Available from: https://wellcome.ac.uk/funding/people-and-projects/grant-funding-data
   Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council. Public engagement funding 2019; [2019 Jun 9]. Available from: https://mrc.ukri.org/research/public-engagement/public-engagement-funding/
   Google Scholar
• Leshner AI. Public engagement with science. Science. 2003;299:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retzbach A, Maier M. Communicating scientific uncertainty. Commun Res. 2014;42:429–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tindana PO, Singh JA, Tracy CS, et al. Grand challenges in global health: community engagement in research in developing countries. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlyn B, Shanahan M, Lewis H, et al. Factors affecting public engagement by researchers: a study on behalf of a consortium of UK public research funders. London: TNS; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325–350. PubMed PMID: 18173388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boivin A, L’Espérance A, Gauvin F-P, et al. Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making: a systematic review of evaluation tools. Health Expectations. 2018;21:1075–1084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2017;3:13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lafrenière D, Cox SM. ‘If you can call it a poem’: toward a framework for the assessment of arts-based works. Qual Res. 2013;13:318–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilroy A, Garner C, Parkinson C, et al. Towards transformation: exploring the impact of culture, creativity and the arts on health and wellbeing. Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Enria L. Co-producing knowledge through participatory theatre: reflections on ethnography, empathy and power. Qual Res. 2016;16:319–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhead J, Leach M, Small M. Public engagement with science? Local understandings of a vaccine trial in the Gambia. J Biosoc Sci. 2005;38:103–116. Epub 11/03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh S, Rickard LN, McComas KA, et al. Public understanding of one health messages: the role of temporal framing. Public Understanding Sci. 2018;27:185–196. PubMed PMID: 29353551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyirenda D, Makawa TC, Chapita G, et al. Public engagement in Malawi through a health-talk radio programme ‘Umoyo nkukambirana’: a mixed-methods evaluation. Public Understanding Sci. 2018;27:229–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim R, Peto TJ, Tripura R, et al. Village drama against malaria. Lancet. 2016;388:2990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis M, Whittaker A, Lindgren M, et al. Understanding media publics and the antimicrobial resistance crisis. Glob Public Health. 2017;13:1158–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyirenda D, Makawa TC, Chapita G, et al. Public engagement in Malawi through a health-talk radio programme ‘Umoyo nkukambirana’: a mixed-methods evaluation. Public Understanding Sci. 2016;27:229–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austen K. The art of health: exploring creative engagement with research [workshop report]. Mumbai: Wellcome Trust; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Allison PD, Higginson P, Martin S. Antibiotic resistance awareness: a public engagement approach for all pharmacists. Int J Pharm Pract. 2017;25:93–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen ER, Masum H, Berndtson K, et al. Public engagement on global health challenges. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abimbola S. Beyond positive a priori bias: reframing community engagement in LMICs (epub ahead of print). Health Promot Int. 2019. DOI:10.1093/heapro/daz023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzo E, Doyle C, Matthews R, et al. Patient and public involvement: how much do we spend and what are the benefits? Health Expectations. 2015;18:1918–1926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho H, Salmon CT. Unintended effects of health communication campaigns. J Commun. 2007;57:293–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fynbo L, Jensen CS. Antimicrobial stigmatization: public health concerns about conventional pig farming and pig farmers’ experiences with stigmatization. Soc Sci Med. 2018;201:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IVAR. Reflections from the review of the wellcome trust’s public engagement fund. London: Institute for Voluntary Action Research; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Haenssgen MJ, Charoenboon N, Zanello G, et al. Antibiotics and activity spaces: protocol of an exploratory study of behaviour, marginalisation, and knowledge diffusion. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3:e000621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD Development Assistance Committee. Evaluating development co-operation: summary of key norms and standards. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Forss K. An evaluation framework for information, consultation and public participation. In: OECD, editor. Evaluating public participation in policy making. Paris: Organisation for Economics Co-Operation and Development; 2005. p. 41–84.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer LJ, Rowe G. Evaluating public participation exercises: strategic and practical issues. In: OECD, editor. Evaluating public participation in policy making. Paris: Organisation for Economics Co-Operation and Development; 2005. p. 58–108.
   Google Scholar
• The Global Health Network. Mesh - community engagement network 2019; [2019 Jun 9]. Available from: https://mesh.tghn.org/
   Google Scholar
• Friedman AJ, editor. Framework for evaluating impacts of informal science education projects: report from a National Science Foundation workshop. Alexandria, VA: The National Science Foundation; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Ten threats to global health in 2019 2019; [2019 September 18]. Available from: World Health Organization Web page: https://www.who.int/emergencies/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
   Google Scholar
• Minkler M. Community-based research partnerships: challenges and opportunities. J Urban Health. 2005;82:ii3–ii12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdridge D, Gabb J, Lawson J. Art as a pathway to impact: understanding the affective experience of public engagement with film. Sociological Rev. 2019;67:585–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway S. Theory-based evaluation and the social impact of the arts. Cult Trends. 2009;18:125–148.
   Google Scholar
• Etherton M, Prentki T. Drama for change? Prove it! Impact assessment in applied theatre. Res Drama Educ. 2006;11:139–155.
   Google Scholar
• Ledgard A. Blood makes noise: evaluation. 2013 [cited 2019 Oct 29]. Available from: http://annaledgard.com/wp-content/uploads/BMNReport1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ledgard A. Under the microscope: evaluation report. 2016 [cited 2019 Oct 29]. Available from: http://annaledgard.com/wp-content/uploads/UtMEvalReport-FINAL3.5.16small-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holkup PA, Tripp-Reimer T, Salois EM, et al. Community-based participatory research: an approach to intervention research with a Native American community. Adv Nurs Sci. 2004;27:162–175. PubMed PMID: 15455579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell S, Aggleton P, editors. Monitoring and evaluation in health and social development. London: Routledge; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe G, Horlick-Jones T, Walls J, et al. Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops. Public Understanding Sci. 2005;14:331–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher G. Addressing gender in impact evaluation. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Charoenboon N, Haenssgen MJ, Warapikuptanun P, et al. Translating antimicrobial resistance: a case study of context and consequences of antibiotic-related communication in three northern Thai villages. Palgrave Commun. 2019;5:23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenssgen MJ, Xayavong T, Charoenboon N, et al. The consequences of AMR education and awareness raising: outputs, outcomes, and behavioural impacts of an antibiotic-related educational activity in Lao PDR. Antibiotics. 2018;7:95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenssgen MJ, Charoenboon N, Do NTT, et al. How context can impact clinical trials: a multi-country qualitative case study comparison of diagnostic biomarker test interventions. Trials. 2019;20:111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis GB. The practice of cross-cultural cognitive interviewing. Public Opin Q. 2015;79:359–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenssgen MJ, Charoenboon N, Thavethanutthanawin P, et al. Tales of Treatment: how local voices and public engagement activities can shape global health research and policy. Development Studies Association 2019 annual conference; 2019 Jun 19–21; Milton Keynes; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. World antibiotic awareness week: 2016 campaign toolkit. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health England. UK case of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with high-level resistance to azithromycin and resistance to ceftriaxone acquired abroad. Health Prot Report Adv Access Rep. 2018;12:11.
   Google Scholar
• Lim C, Takahashi E, Hongsuwan M, et al. Epidemiology and burden of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection in a developing country. eLife. 2016;5:e18082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumpradit N, Wongkongkathep S, Poonpolsup S, et al. New chapter in tackling antimicrobial resistance in Thailand. BMJ. 2017;358. DOI:10.1136/bmj.j2423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health. Health sector reform: strategy and framework till 2025. Vientiane: The Lao People’s Democratic Republic; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• WHOWPRO. Meeting on multisectoral action on antimicrobial resistance in Cambodia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Viet Nam, 18–20 January 2017, Hanoi, Viet Nam. Manila: World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar